Economic Botany

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 374–385 | Cite as

Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge in a rural community of northwestern Patagonia, Argentina

  • Mariana Lozada
  • Ana Ladio
  • Mariana WeigandtEmail author


In the present study we analyzed medicinal and edible plant utilization in Cuyin Manzano, a small rural population located near the Andean forests of Argentina. We also studied where and when plant knowledge was learned, who the principal transmitters were, and how people were taught. The participants were interviewed individually and at random, by means of a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were carried out in 16 families in order to examine the present use of wild plants. The inhabitants of Cuyin Manzano cited 87 plants: 63 medicinal and 24 edible species. They mentioned on average 31 ± 10 species per person. Similar patterns of plant use were found in young and old people alike, irrespective of gender. Learning about useful plants took place at an early age as a result of family tradition. This local knowledge is acquired and taught “by doing,” and is mostly transmitted vertically through family dissemination. Wild plant learning implies the acquisition of plants' physical and functional features as well as their environmental characteristics.

Key Words

Learning of ethnobotanical information Mapuche indigenous tradition Patagonia Argentina traditional ecological knowledge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Atran, S., D. Medin, N. Ross, E. Lynch, J. Coley, C. Timura, and V. Vapnarsky. 1999. Folkecology and commons management in the Maya lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 96(13):7598–7603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begossi, A., N. Hanazaki, and J. Tamashiro. 2002. Medicinal plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): Knowledge, use, and conservation. Human Ecology 30(3)281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benz, B.F., F. Santana, R. Pineda, J. Cevallos, L. Robles, and D. de Niz. 1994. Characterization of mestizo plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan, Jalisco-Colima, México. Journal of Ethnobiology 14(1):23–41Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10(5):1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobotanical classification. Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  6. Boesch, C, and M. Tomasello. 1998. Chimpanzee and human cultures. Current Anthropology 39(5):591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boster, J. S. 1985. Requiem for the omniscient informant: There is a life in the old girl yet. Pages 177–197 in J.W.D. Dougherty, ed. Directions in cognitive anthropology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Brodt, S. 2001. A systems perspective on the conservation and erosion of indigenous agricultural knowledge in central India. Human Ecology 29(l):99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casas, A., J.L. Viveros, E. Katz, and J. Caballero. 1987. Las plantas en la Alimentatión Mixteca: Una aproximacóin etnobotánica. Amx00E9;rica Indígena XLVII(2):317–343.Google Scholar
  10. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., M.W. Feldman, K.H. Chen, and S.M. Dornbusch. 1982. Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science 218(4567): 19–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Citarella, L. 1995. Medicinas y culturas en La Araucanía. Trafkin. Programa de atención primaria en salud. Cooperatión Italiana. Editorial Sudamericana, Chile.Google Scholar
  12. Correa, M.N. 1969-1998. Flora Patagónica. Colección Cientiíica del I.N.T.A. Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, S., S. Nebel, and M. Heinrich. 2005. Questionnaire surveys: Methodological and epistemological problems for field-based ethnopharmacologists. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 100:30–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Estomba, D., A. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2006. Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103:109–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ezcurra, C, and C. Brion. 2005. Plantas del Nahuel Huapi. Catálogo de la Flora Vascular del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Red Latinoamericana de Botánica, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrari, M. A., F. Morazzani, and L. V. Pinotti. 2004. Patrón alimentario de una comunidad aborigen de la Patagonia Argentina. Revista Chilena de Nutrition 31(2):110–117.Google Scholar
  17. Figueiredo, G. M., H. F. Leitao-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1997. Ethnobotany of Atlantic forest coastal communities: II. Diversity of plant uses at Sepetiba Bay (Brazil). Human Ecology 25(2):353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garro, L. C. 1986. Intracultural variation in folk medical knowledge: A comparison between curers and noncurers. American Anthropologist 88:351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gispert, M., and A. Gómez Campos. 1986. Plantas medicinales silvestres: El proceso de adquisición, transmisión y colectivización del conocimiento vegetal. Biótica 11(2): 113–125.Google Scholar
  20. Gotelli, N.J., and G.L. Entsminger. 2000. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 5.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. m.Google Scholar
  21. Hewlett, B.S., and L.L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1986. Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. American Anthropologist 88(4):922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hóft, M., S.K. Bank, and A.M. Lykke. 1999. Quantitative ethnobotany. Applications of multivariate and statistical analyses in ethnobotany. People and Plant Working Paper.Google Scholar
  23. Ladio A. H. 2006. Wild plant foods with medicinal use in a Mapuche Community of NW Patagonia. In Andrea Pieroni and Lisa Price, eds. Eating and healing: Explorations of traditional food as medicines. Haworth Press, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  24. —, and M. Lozada. 2001. Non timber forest product use in two human populations from northwest Patagonia: A quantitative approach. Human Ecology 29(4):367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — 2003. Comparison of wild edible plant diversity and foraging strategies in two aboriginal communities of northwestern Patagonia. Biodivesity and Conservation 12:937–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 2004. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: A case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1153–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leonti, M., O. Sticher, and M. Heinrich. 2002. Medicinal plants of the Popoluca, Mexico: Organoleptic properties as indigenous selection criteria. Journal of Ethnopharmachology 81:307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mellado Campos, V, E. Medina Cñrdenas, and C. San Martín Saldias. 1996. Herbolaria Medica de Chile. Diagnóstico de su estado actual y perspectives futuras para la Medicina Oficial Chilena. Ministerio de Salud de Chile.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, J.R. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(8):430–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monteiro, J. M., U. P. Albuquerque, E. R. Freitas Lins-Neto, E. Lima de Araujo, and E. L. Cavalcanti de Amorimc. 2006. Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105:173–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nolan, J. 2001. Pursuing the fruits of knowledge: Cognitive ethnobotany in Missouri’s Little Dixie. Journal of Ethnobiology 21(2):29–51.Google Scholar
  32. Ohmagari, K., and F. Berkes. 1997. Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the Western James Bay Crée women of subarctic Canada. Human Ecology 25(2): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salik, J., N. Cellinese, and S. Knapp. 1997. Indigenous diversity of cassava: Generation, maintenance, use and loss among the Amuesha, Peruvian Upper Amazon. Economic Botany 51(1):6–19.Google Scholar
  34. Sternberg, R. J. 2004. Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist 19(5):325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomasello, M., A.C. Kruger, and H.H. Ratner. 1993. Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Villagrán, C. 1998. Botánica Indýgena de los bosques de Chile: Sistema de clasificación de un recurso de uso múltiple. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 71:245–268.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consejo National de Investigaciones Cientifico y Técnicas, Laboratorio Ecotono, Centro Regional Universitario BarilocheUniversidad National del ComahueArgentina

Personalised recommendations