Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 130–142 | Cite as

Wild gathered food plants in the European mediterranean: A comparative analysis

  • M. Leonti
  • S. Nebel
  • D. Rivera
  • M. Heinrich

Abstract

The Mediterranean basin has a long and multifaceted cultural history and harbors a high biodiversity. Epidemiological studies have drawn attention to certain traditional Mediterranean diets. However, wild gathered food species, which are an important, but fast disappearing element of these diets, so far have been largely neglected in scientific studies. In this study we compare ethnobotanical data obtained from field studies conducted in Southern Italy, Southern Spain, mainland Greece, and Crete resulting in the identification of a core group of 18 culinary used wild gathered plant species. This group comprises species likePapaver rhoeas L.,Sonchus asper L.,S. oleraceus L., andSilene vulgaris L. We argue that the culinary use of wild gathered weedy greens evolved together with the neolithization process, since this offered the necessary ecological niches for them to thrive, thereby enriching and securing the diets of European agriculturalists. Especially wild gathered Asteraceae species seem to form a sort of proto-nutraceutical, which accounts for a significant input of biologically active compounds in the diet.

Key words

Mediterranean basin wild (local) food comparative analysis (comparative) ethnobotany Neolithicum weeds Mediterranean diet(s) history of plant use 

Plantas silvestres comestibles recolectadas en el mediterrÁneo Europeo: Un analisis comparativo

Resumen

II bacino Mediterraneo ha vissuto una lunga e multisfaccettata storia culturale e gode di una ricca biodiversita. Studi epidemiologici hanno attirato attenzione su certe diete] mediterranee. Attualmente I’ uso culinario di piante selvagge e commestibili, elemento importante di queste diete, si sta perdendo e ha ricevuto poca attenzione dai punto di vista scientifico. In questo lavoro mettiamo a paragone una serie di dati etnobotanici ottenuti da ricerche di campo nel sud dell’Italia, nel sud della Spagna, nella Grecia e a Creta risultanti nell’identificazione di un gruppo principale di 18 specie selvatiche ad uso culinario. Questo gruppo comprende specie come ilPapaver rhoeas L., ilSonchus asper L., ilS. oleraceus L. e ilSilene vulgaris L. Mettiamo in evidenza che l’evoluzione dell’uso culinario delle verdure selvatiche è avvenuto durante il processo di neolitizazzione poiché questo ha fornito le nicchie ecologiche necessarie. Attraverso il loro uso gli agricoltori europei hanno arricchito e assicurato la loro dieta. In modo particolare le specie raccolte selvatiche appartenenti alle Astaraceae sembrano formare un protointegratore rappresentando una fonte significativa di composti biologicamente attivi nella dieta.

Piante commestibili raccolte in ambiente selvatico nell’Europa mediterranea: Analisi comparativa

Résumé

La Cuenca Mediterránea tiene una historia cultural larga y polifacetica y alberga una biodiversidad extraordinaria. Diversos estudios epidemiologicos han atraido atencion sobre algunas dietas mediterraneas tradicionales. Sin embargo, las especies silvestres comestibles recolectadas, un elemento importante de estas dietas que va desapareciendo rápidamente, han sido hasta ahora casie olvidadas en los estudios científicos. En este artículo comparamos datos etnobotánicos obtenidos de estudios de campo realizados en el sur de Italia, de España y de la Grecia continental y en Creta, que conducen a la identificatión de un grupo central de 18 especies de plantas recolectadas, silvestres, usadas en alimentatión. Este grupo comprende especies comoPapaver rhoeas L.,Sonchus asper L., 5.oleraceus L. ySilene vulgaris L. Sostenemos que el uso culinario de verduras silvestres y de hierbas de los campos de cultivo evolucionó asociado al proceso del neolitización, que ofreció los nichos ecológicos necesarios para el desarrollo de estas especies, enriqueciendo y afianzando las dietas de los primeros agricultores europeos. Especialmente las especies silvestres recolectadas de [la familia] Asteraceae, parecen constituir un tipo de proto-nutracéutico que aporta significativamente compuestos biológicamente activos a la dieta.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Apicius, M.G. 1991. Das Römische Kochbuch des Apicius. Apicii Libri Decem Qui Dicuntur De Re Coquinaria Et Excerpta A Vinidario. P. Reclam jun. GmbH & Co., Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold Apostolides, N. 1985. Contribution a la con-naissance ethnobotanique et medicinale de la flore de Chipre. Université de Paris. Paris (PhD Thesis).Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, S.C.H. 1983. Crop Mimicry in Weeds. Economic Botany 37:255–282.Google Scholar
  4. Bayer, E., K.P. Buttler, X. Finkenzeller, and J. Grau. 1990. Plantas del Mediterráneo. Naturart, S. A. Es un libro BLUME, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  5. Biesalski, H. K. and P. Grimm. 2004. Taschenatlas der Ernährung (3. Aufl.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York. [English translation: 2005, Pocket Atlas of Nutrition].Google Scholar
  6. Bonet, M.A. and J. Vall’s. 2002. Use of non-crop food vascular plants in Montseny biosphere reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 53:225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, C. H. 1985. Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Current Anthropology 26:43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordain, L., S.B. Eaton, J. Brand-Miller, N. Mann, and K. Hill. 2002. The paradoxical nature of hunter-gatherer diets: Meat-based, yet not athero-genic. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 56 (S):42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordain, L., S.B. Eaton, A. Sebastian, N. Mann, S. Lindeberg, B.A. Watkins, J.H. O’Keefe, and J. Brand-Miller. 2005. Origins and evolution of the western diet: Health implications for the 21st century. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 81:341–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, M., C. Galli, F. Visioli, S. Renaud, A. P. Simopoulos, and A. A. Spector. 2000. Role of plant-derived omega-3 fatty acids in human nutrition. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 44:263–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Loreril M., S. Renaud, N. Mamelle, P. Salen, J. L. Martin, I. Monjaud, J. Guidollet, P. Touboul, and J. Delaye. 1994. Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet 11: 343(8911): 1454–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Loreril M., P. Salen, J. L. Martin, I. Monjaud, P. Boucher, and N. Mamelle. 1998. Mediterranean dietary pattern in a randomized trial. Prolonged survival and possible reduced cancer rate. Archives of Internal Medicine 158:1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Loreril M., P. Salen, J.L. Martin, I. Monjaud, J. Delaye, and N. Mamelle. 1999. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction. Final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation 99:779–785.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, J. 2002. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418:700–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eaton, S.B. 2000. Paleolithic vs. modern diets-Selected pathophysiological implications. European Journal of Nutrition 39:67–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eberle, G. 1975. Pflanzen am Mittelmeer. Mediterrane Pflanzengemeinschaften Italiens und Griechen-lands mit Ausblick auf das ganze Mittelmeergebiet. Verlag von Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  17. Etkin, N. and P. Ross. 1983. Malaria, medicine and meals: Plant use among the Hausa and its impact on disease. Pages 231–259 in L. Romanucci-Ross, D. Moerman, and L. Tancredi, eds., The anthropology of medicine: From culture to method. Bergin and Garvey, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Etkin, N. 1996. Medicinal cuisines: Diet and ethnopharmacology. International Journal of Pharmacognosy 34:313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenton, A. 2000. Wild plants and hungry times. Pages 182–194 in P. Lysaght, ed., Food from nature, attitudes, strategies and culinary practices, Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Commission for Ethnological Food Research, Umea and Frostviken, Sweden, 8–14 June, 1998. Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi LXXI, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  20. Forbes, M.H.C. 1976. Gathering in the Argolid: A subsistence subsystem in a Greek agricultural community. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 268:251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franke, W. 1997. Nutzpflanzenkunde. Nutzbare Gewachse der gemässigten Breiten, Subtropen und Tropen. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Frohne, D. and U. Jensen. 1998. Systematik des Pflanzenreichs. Unter Besonderer Berücksichti-gung Chemischer Merkmale und Pflanzlicher Drogen. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  23. Galt, A.H. and J.W. Galt. 1978. Peasant use of some wild plant on the island of Pantelleria, Sicily. Economic Botany 32:20–26.Google Scholar
  24. Gümez, D., J. Azorín, J. Bastida, F. Viladomat, and C. Codina. 2003. Seasonal and spatial variations of alkaloids inMerendera montana in relation to chemical defense and phenology. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:1117–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guarrera, P. M. 2003. Food medicine and minor nourishment in the folk traditions of Central Italy (Marche, Abruzzo and Latium). Fitoterapia 74:515–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harlan, J.R. 1992. Crops & Man. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  27. Heinrich, M., M. Leonti, S. Nebel, and W. Peschel. 2005. “Local food nutraceuticals”: An example of a multidisciplinary research project on local knowledge. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56 (S):5–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heldreich, T. 1862. Die Nutzpflanzen Griechenlands: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der neugriechischen und pelasgischen Vulgarnamen. Karl Wilberg, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  29. Heywood, V. 1999. Use and potential of wild plants in farm households. FAO Farm Systems Management Series 15.Google Scholar
  30. Holm, L. 1978. Some characteristics of weed problems in two worlds. Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Sciences 31:3–12. Pages 42–43 in R.L. Zimdahl, ed., 1999. Fundamentals of Weed Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Husek, A., N. Sütülpinar, H. Potesilová, S. Dvoracková, V. Hanus, P. Sedemera, P. Malon, and V. Simanek. 1989. Alkaloids and phenolics of threeMerendera species. Phytochemistry 28:3217–3219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huss-Ashmore, R. and S.L. Johnston. 1994. Wild plants as cultural adaptations to food stress. Pages 62–82 in Nina L. gnEtkin, ed., Eating on the wild side. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  33. Jacomet, S., C. Brombacher, and M. Dick. 1989. Archäobotanik am Zürichsee. Ackerbau Sammelwirtschaft und Umwelt von Neolithischen und Bronzezeitlichen Seeufersiedlungen im Raum Zürich. Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich.Google Scholar
  34. Johns, T. 1990. With bitter herbs they shall eat it: Chemical ecology and the origins of human diet and medicine. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  35. Keys, A. 1970. Coronary heart disease in 7 countries. Circulation 41 (S):1–211.Google Scholar
  36. Keys, A. 1980. Seven countries: A multivariate analysis of death and coronary heart disease. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  37. King, F. B. 1994. Interpreting wild plant foods in archaeological record. Pages 185–209 in Nina L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  38. Leonti, M., F. Ramirez-R., O. Sticher, and M. Heinrich. 2003. Medicinal flora of the Popoluca, México: A Botanico-Systematical perspective. Economic Botany 57:218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lionis, C., A. Faresjö, M. Skoula, M. Kapsokefalou, and T. Fanenjö. 1998. Antioxidant effects of herbs in Crete. The Lancet 352:1987–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loboda, A., J. Cisowski, A. Zarebski, A. Jazwa, D. Rivera Nuñez, Z. Kypriotakis, M. Heinrich, M. Dulak and J. Dulak. 2005. Effect of plant extracts on angiogenetic activities of endothelial cells and ker-atinocytes. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56 (S):125–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Logan, M. H. and A. R. Dixon. 1994. Agriculture and the acquisition of medicinal plant knowledge. Pages 25–45 in Nina L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  42. Mann, N. J. 2004. Paleolithic nutrition: What can we learn from the past? Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 13(S):17.Google Scholar
  43. Maurizio, A. 1927. Die Geschichte unserer Nahrungspflanzen. Von den Urzeiten bis zur Gegenwart. Verlagsbuchhandlung Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  44. Moerman, D. E. 1994. North American food and drug plants. Pages 166–181 in Nina L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the Wild Side. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  45. Moerman, D.E., R.W. Pemberton, D. Kiefer, and B. Berlin. 1999. A comparative analysis of five medicinal floras. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:49–67.Google Scholar
  46. Nebel, S. 2005. Ta Chorta: Piante comestibili tradizionali di Gallicianò. The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  47. Nebel, S. and M. Heinrich. n.d. The use of wild edible greens in the Graecanic area in Calabria, Southern Italy-cultural survival of Magna Grae-cian traditions, (in preparation).Google Scholar
  48. Nebel, S., A. Pieroni, and M. Heinrich. (n.d.). Ta chorta: wild edible greens used in the Graecanic area in Calabria, Southern Italy, (in preparation).Google Scholar
  49. Pieroni, A., S. Nebel, C. Quave, H. Münz, and M. Heinrich. 2002. Ethnopharmacology ofLiakra: Traditional Weedy Vegetables of the Abërëshe of the Vulture Area in Southern Italy. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 81:165–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pieroni, A., S. Nebel, and M. Heinrich. 2005. Food for two seasons: Culinary uses of non-cultivated local vegetables and mushrooms in a south Italian village. International Journal for Food Science and Nutrition 56:245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rivera, D., C. Obon, C. Inocencio, M. Heinrich, A. Verde, J. Fajardo, and R. llorach. 2005. the ethnobotanical study of local mediterranean food Plants as Medicinal Resources in Southern Spain. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56 (S):97–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivera, D., A. Verde, J. Fajardo, C. Inocencio, C. Obon, and M. Heinrich. 2006. Guía Etnobotanica de los Alimentos Locales Recolectados en la Provincia de Albacete. Instituto de Estudios Al-bacetenses “Don Juan Manuel,” Albacete. Savvìdes, L. 2000. Edible wild plants of the Cyprus flora. Nicosia, private publication.Google Scholar
  53. Schaffer, S., S. Schmitt-Schilling, W.E. Müller, and G. P. Eckert. 2005. Antioxidant properties of Mediterranean food plant extracts: Geographical differences. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56 (S): 125–137.Google Scholar
  54. Shanin, T. 1979. Peasant and Peasant Societies. Harmondsworth. Penguin.Google Scholar
  55. Skadias, P. K. and J. G. Lascaratos. 2001. Dietetics in Ancient Greek philosophy: Plato’s concepts of healthy diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55:532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stepp, J.R. and D.E. Moerman. 2001. The Importance of Weeds in Ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75:19–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stepp, J.R. 2004. The role of weeds as sources of Pharmaceuticals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 92:163–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tardío, J., H. Pascual, and R. Morales. 2005. Wild food plants traditionally used in the province of Madrid, Central Spain. Economic Botany 59:122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tardío, J., M. Pardo de Santayana, and R. Morales. n.d. Ethnobotanical review of edible plants in Spain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (in press).Google Scholar
  60. The Local Food-Nutraceutical Consortium. 2005. Local Mediterranean diets: A joint ethnobotanical and phyto-pharmacological approach. Pharmacological Research 52:353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trichopoulou A., P. Lagiou, H. Kuper, and D. Trichopoulos. 2000. Cancer and Mediterranean diet traditions. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 9:869–873.Google Scholar
  62. Tukan, S.K., H.R. Takruri, and D.M. Al-Eisawi. 1998. The use of wild edible plants in the Jordanian diet. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 49:225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Verde, A., D. Rivera, and C. Obon. 1998. Etnobotanica en las Sierras de Segura y Alcaraz: Las plantas y el hombre. Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses, Albacete.Google Scholar
  64. Verde A., J. Fajardo, D. Rivera, and C. Obón. 2001. Etnobotánica en el entorno del Parque Nacional de Cabañeros. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.Google Scholar
  65. Verde, A., D. Rivera, M. Heinrich, J. Fajardo, C. Inocencio, R. Llorach, and C. Obón. 2003. Plantas Alimenticias Recolectadas Tradicionalmente en la Provincia de Albacete y Zonas Próximas, su Uso Tradicional en la Medicina Popular y su Potencial como Nutracéuticos. Sabuco. Revista de Estudios Albacetenses. Año III (4):37–72.Google Scholar
  66. Willerding, U. 1986. Zur Geschichte der Unkräuter Mitteleuropas. Göttinger Schriften zur Vor-und Frühgeschichte Band 22. Karl Wachholtz Verlag, Neumünster.Google Scholar
  67. Zeghichi, S., S. Kallithraka, A. P. Simopoulos, and Z. Kypriotakis. 2003. Nutritional composition of slected wild plants in the diet of Crete. Pages. 22–40 in A. P. Simopoulos and C. Gopalan, eds., Plants in human health and nutrition policy. World Review of Nutrition and Diet, Vol. 91. Karger, Basel, Switzerland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zohary, M. 1973. Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  69. Zohary, D. and M. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Leonti
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Nebel
    • 1
  • D. Rivera
    • 3
  • M. Heinrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, The School of PharmacyUniversity of LondonLondon
  2. 2.Dipartimento Farmaco Chimico TecnologicoUniversitá di CagliariItaly
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Facultad de BiologiaUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations