Brittonia

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 345–353 | Cite as

Ecology of two geographically restricted Astragalus species (Fabaceae), A. bibullatus and A. tennesseensis, of the eastern United States

Abstract

Astragalus bibullatus is endemic to limestone glades in the Central Basin of Tennessee, and except for one population in Illinois,A. tennesseensis is endemic to limestone glades in the Central Basin and in the Moulton Valley of Alabama. However,A. tennesseensis has been extirpated from four counties in Illinois, from its only known site in Indiana, from one county in Tennessee, and from one county in Alabama.Astragalus bibullatus is closely related to the geographically wide-spread Great Plains taxonA. crassicarpus var.crassicarpus (sectionSarcocarpi), whereasA tennesseensis is the only taxon in sectionTennesseensis. Both species are shallow-rooted, hemicryptophyte perennials without vegetative reproduction, have no effective means of seed dispersal, form long-lived seed banks, have similar life cycle phenologies, are intolerant of heavy shade, and have moderate amounts of genetic diversity. Much. additional information is available on the autecology ofA. tennesseensis. Its primary habitat is the transition zone between open glades and glade woods, where physical environmental factors are intermediate between those of the adjacent zones. Seedling-juvenile survival is low. Plants flower first in their second to fifth year and only a few times before dying, are self-incompatible, respond to drought by shedding leaves and by accumulating large amounts of proline, and compete poorly. Populations exhibit high fluctuations in number of individuals and have high turnover rates. A greenhouse study ofA bibullatus andA crassicarpus var.crassicarpus did not identify any difference in responses of these species to light or soil moisture that could account for the great differences in geographic ranges. Thus, historical factors were also considered to explain the narrow endemism ofA. bibullatus. Finally, we present previously unpublished data on the effect of light level and of competition with the cedar glade dominantSporobolus vaginiflorus in several watering regimes on growth ofA. tennesseensis. The role of these factors in restriction of this species to its transition zone microhabitat is discussed.

Key words

Astragalus bibullatus A tennesseensis autecology cedar glade endemics plant response to competition drought and shading 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barneby, R. C.. 1964. Atlas of North AmericanAstragalus. Memoris of The New York Botanical Garden 13: 1–1188.Google Scholar
  2. — &E. L. Bridges. 1987. A new species ofAstragalus (Fabaceae) from. Tennessee’s Central Basin. Brittonia 39: 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskauf, C. J.. 2001. Examining rarity through comparisons with widespread congeners: a genetic and ecophysiological example from limestone glade entemics. Castanea 66: 126–133.Google Scholar
  4. — &S. Snapp. 1998. Population genetics of the cedar-glade endemic.Astragalus bibullatus (Fabaceae) using isozymes. Annals of the Missouri. Botanical Garden 85: 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin, C. C. &J. M. Baskin. 1974. Responses ofAstragalus tennesseensis to drought: changes in tree amino acids and amides during water stress and possible ecological significance. Oecologia 17: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —— &E. Quarterman. 1972. Observations on the ecology ofAstragalus tennesseensis. American Midland Naturalist 88: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —— & —. 1981. Effect of drought stress on transpiration rates and leaf areas ofAstragalus tennesseensis, a near-endemic to cedar glades. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 56: 27–31.Google Scholar
  8. — &E. Quarterman. 1969. Germination requirements ofAstragalus tennesseensis. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 91: 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baskin, J. M. &C. C. Baskin. 1981. A contribution to the ecological life cycle ofAstragalus tennesseensis. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 56: 4–6.Google Scholar
  10. — & —. 1989. Cedar glade endemics, and a review of their autecology. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 64: 63–74.Google Scholar
  11. — & —. 1999. Cedar glades of the southeastern United States. Pages 206–219.In: R. C. Anderson, J. S. Fralish, and J. M. Baskin, editors. Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. — & —. 2003. The vascular flora of cedar glades of the southeastern United States and its phytogeographical relationships. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 130: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —. 1997. The comparative autecology of endemic globally-rare and geographically-widespread common plant species: three case studies. Southwestern Naturalist 42: 384–399.Google Scholar
  14. Bowles, M. L., K. R. Bachtell, M. M. DeMauro, L. G. Sykora &C. R. Bautista. 1988. Propagation techniques used in establishing a greenhouse population ofAstragalus tennesseensis Gray. Natural Areas Journal 8: 121–122.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1993. Propagation of rare plants from historic seed collections: implications for species restoration and herbarium management. Restoration Ecology 1: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caudle, C. F.. 1968. Studies on the life history and hydro-economy ofAstragalus tennesseensis (Leguminosae). Ph.D. thesis. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  17. Delcourt, P. A. &H. R. Delcourt. 1981. Vegetation maps for eastern North America: 40,000 yr BP to the present. Pages 123–165.In: R. C. Romans, editor. Geobotany II. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. DeSelm, H. R.. 1959. A new map of the central Basin of Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 34: 66–72, 96.Google Scholar
  19. Edwards, A. L., B. Wiltshire &D. L. Nickrent. 2004. Genetic diversity inAstragalus tennesseensis and the federal endangeredDalea foliosa (Fabaceae). Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 131: 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Homoya, M. A., D. B. Abrell, J. R. Aldrich &T. W. Post. 1984. The natural regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94: 245–268+ colored map of the natural regions of Indiana by M. A. Homoya.Google Scholar
  21. Isely, D.. 1998. Native and naturalized Leguminosae (Fabaceae) of the United States. (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii). Monte L. Bean Life Sciences Museum. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
  22. McClain, W. E. &J. E. Ebinger. 2003. The genusAstragalus in Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 97: 11–18.Google Scholar
  23. McCue, K., E. Belt &M. Yarlina. 2001. Propagation protocol forAstragalus bibullatus. Native Plants Journal 2: 131–132.Google Scholar
  24. —. 2002. Battlefield harbors a rare Tennessee plant. Endangered Species Bull. (July/August) 27(3): 18–19.Google Scholar
  25. McFall, D. W.. 1984. Vascular plants of the Manito gravel prairie. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 77: 9–14.Google Scholar
  26. McGregor, R. L.. 1968. The taxonomy of the genusEchinacea, Kansas University Science Bulletin 40: 113–142.Google Scholar
  27. Morris, A. B., R. S. Baucom &M. B. Cruzan. 2002. Stratified analysis of the soil seed bank in the cedar glade endemicAstragalus bibullatus: evidence for historical changes in genetic structure. American Journal of Botany 89: 29–36.Google Scholar
  28. Post, T. W., J. A. Bacone &J. R. Aldrich. 1985. Gravel hill prairies of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94: 457–463.Google Scholar
  29. Quarterman, E.. 1950. Major plant communities of Tennessee cedar glades. Ecology. 31: 334–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwegman, J. E.. 1973. Comprehensive plan for the Illinois nature preserve system. Part 2. The natural divisions of Illinois. Illinois Nature Preserves Commission. Rockford, Illinois. 32 pp + colored map of the natural divisions of Illinois.Google Scholar
  31. —. 1998. Some aspects of the life history and population dynamics ofAstragalus tennesseensis A. Gray in Illinois. Castanea 63: 63–67.Google Scholar
  32. Stuart, W.. 1901. Some additions to the flora of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1901: 282–283.Google Scholar
  33. Webb, D. H., J. M. Baskin &C. C. Baskin. 1992. Distribution and status ofAstragalus tennesseensis (Fabaceae) in Alabama. Sida 15: 97–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations