, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 59–67 | Cite as

Wood and bark anatomy of Muntingiaceae: A phylogenetic comparison within Malvales s. l.

  • Sherwin Carlquist
Structural Botany


Quantitative and qualitative data on wood and bark anatomy are given for Muntingia calabura L. and Dicraspidia donnell-smithii Standley. These data are compared with phylogenetic schemes, based on DNA analysis, in which Muntingiaceae belong to the “dipterocarp clade” within Malvales. The data are consistent with this hypothesis, although Muntingiaceae lack pit vestures in vessels, which are seen in the other malvalean families (Cistaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Neuradaceae, Sarcolaenaceae, Thymeleaceae), and this may represent a loss of pit vestures. All families of the dipterocarp clade agree with both genera of Muntingiaceae in having tracheids as the imperforate tracheary element type (at least ancestrally), although fiber-tracheids also occur in some Dipterocarpaceae and Thymeleaceae. The large size of some malvalean families (with attendant greater diversity in character states) and a paucity of wood studies in those families make for difficulty in comparison of features such as axial parenchyma and ray types with those of Muntingiaceae; character states of these features are consistent with placement of Muntingiaceae in the dipterocarp clade of Malvales. Banded phloem fibers in bark of Muntingiaceae are much like those of other Malvales. Wood of Muntingiaceae is highly mesomorphic according to quantitative vessel features.

Key Words

bark anatomy Cistaceae Dipterocarpaceae Elaeocarpaceae Malvales Thymeleaceae tracheids vessel grouping vestured pits 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alverson, W. S., K. G. Karol, D. A. Baum, M. W. Chase, S. M. Swensen, R. McCourt & K. J. Sytsma. 1998. Circumscription of the Malvales and relationships to other Rosidae: evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 876–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APGII (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II). 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 141: 300–436.Google Scholar
  3. Baas, P. & E. Werker. 1981. A new record of vestured pits in Cistaceae. IAWA Bull. n. s. 2: 41–42.Google Scholar
  4. Bayer, C., M. W. Chase & M. F. Fay. 1998. Muntingiaceae, a new family of dicotyledons with malvalean affinities. Taxon 47: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlquist, S. 1975. Wood anatomy of Onagraceae, with notes on alternative modes of photosynthate movement in dicotyledon woods. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 386–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. — 1982. The use of ethylenediamine in softening hard plant structures for paraffin sectioning. Stain Technol. 57: 311–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1984. Vessel grouping in dicotyledon woods: significance and relationship to imperforate tracheary elements. Aliso 10: 505–525.Google Scholar
  8. — 1988. Tracheid dimorphism: a new pathway in evolution of imperforate tracheary elements. Aliso 12: 102–118.Google Scholar
  9. — 2001. Comparative wood anatomy. 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Den Outer R. W. & P. R. Schütz. 1981. Wood anatomy of some Sarcolaenaceae and Rhopalocarpaceae and their systematic position. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen 81(8): 1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Gasson, P. 1996. Wood anatomy of the Elaeocarpaceae. Pages 47–71. In: L. Donaldson, A. P. Singh, B. G. Butterfield, L. J. Whitehouse, editors, Recent advances in wood anatomy. Rotorua.Google Scholar
  12. Gottwald H. & N. Parameswaran. 1966. Das sekundäre Xylem de Familie Dipterocarpaceae, anatomische Untersuchungen zur Taxonomie und Phylogenie. Bot. Jahrb. 85: 410–508.Google Scholar
  13. Gregory, M. 1994. Bibliography of systematic wood anatomy of dicotyledons. IAWA J., suppl. 1: 1–265.Google Scholar
  14. IAWA Committee on Nomenclature. 1964. Multilingual glossary of terms used in wood anatomy. Verlagsbuchanstalt Buchdruckerei Konkordia. Winterthur.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2000. Vestured pits in Malvales s. l.: a character with taxonomic significance hidden in the secondary xylem. Taxon 49: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2001. Vestured pits: their occurrence and systematic importance in eudicots. Taxon 50: 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 1998. Vestures in woody plants: a review. IAWA J. 19: 347–382.Google Scholar
  18. Metcalfe, C. R. & L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prince, W. J. Kress, K. C. Nixon & J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 133: 381–461.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden Press 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherwin Carlquist
    • 1
  1. 1.Santa Barbara Botanic GardenSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations