Abstract
Neurosurgery is a highly specialized field: it often involves surgical manipulation of noble structures and cerebral retraction is frequently necessary to reach deep-seated brain lesions. There are still no reliable methods preventing possible retraction complications. The objective of this study was to design work chambers well suited for transcranial endoscopic surgery while providing safe retraction of the surrounding brain tissue. The chamber is designed to be inserted close to the intracranial point of interest; once it is best placed it can be opened. This should guarantee an appreciable workspace similar to that of current neurosurgical procedures. The experimental aspect of this study involved the use of a force sensor to evaluate the pressures exerted on the brain tissue during the retraction phase. Following pterional craniotomy, pressure measurements were made during retraction with the use of a conventional metal spatula with different inclinations. Note that, although the force values necessary for retraction and exerted on the spatula by the neurosurgeon are the same, the local pressure exerted on the parenchyma at the edge of the spatula at different inclinations varied greatly. A new method of cerebral retraction using a chamber retractor (CR) has been designed to avoid any type of complication due to spatula edge overpressures and to maintain acceptable pressure values exerted on the parenchyma.
概要
神经外科作为高度专业化领域,常涉及对精细结构的手术操作,其中大脑牵拉术常用于触及大脑深层病灶,但目前尚无可靠的方法预防系列牵拉并发症的发生。本研究拟设计一种适用于经颅内镜手术的新技术,以保证周围脑组织的安全牵拉。新技术设计将可扩展腔插入颅内病灶点附近,置于最佳位置后即可被打开,保证了神经外科手术中可观的操作空间。本研究涉及使用力传感器评估牵拉阶段施加在脑组织上的压力值试验。翼点开颅术后,在牵拉过程中使用不同倾角的传统金属抹刀测量压力,尽管牵拉和施加在抹刀上的力相同,但抹刀边缘以不同倾角施加在实质脑组织上的局部压力变化却很大。综上,本研究通过设计一种腔式牵开器,用于大脑牵拉,避免由于边缘超压引起牵拉并发症,以保持施加在实质脑组织上的压力值适宜。
References
Aggravi M, de Momi E, DiMeco F, et al., 2016. Hand-tool-tissue interaction forces in neurosurgery for haptic rendering. Med Biol Eng Comput, 54(8): 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1439-8
Andrews RJ, Bringas JR, 1993. A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery, 33(6):1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199312000-00014
Assina R, Rubino S, Sarris CE, et al., 2014. The history of brain retractors throughout the development of neurological surgery. Neurosurg Focus, 36(4):E8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13564
Bander ED, Jones SH, Kovanlikaya I, et al., 2016. Utility of tubular retractors to minimize surgical brain injury in the removal of deep intraparenchymal lesions: a quantitative analysis of FLAIR hyperintensity and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. J Neurosurg, 124(4):1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015AJNS142576
Bekeny JR, Swaney PJ, Webster III RJ, et al., 2013. Forces applied at the skull base during transnasal endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary tumor excision. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 74(6):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1345108
Bertelsen A, Melo J, Sánchez E, et al., 2013. A review of surgical robots for spinal interventions. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg, 9(4):407–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1469
Blanco RGF, Boahene K, 2013. Robotic-assisted skull base surgery: preclinical study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 23(9):776–782. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0573
Budday S, Nay R, de Rooij R, et al., 2015. Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 46:318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024
Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, de Lara D, et al., 2013. Combined transoral robotic surgery and endoscopic endonasal approach for the resection of extensive malignancies of the skull base. Head Neck, 35(11):E351–E358. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23238
Chen XS, 2017. Numerical Models of Blunt Dissection and Brain Retraction for Neurosurgery Simulations. PhD Dissemination, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. https://doi.org/10.14943/doctoral.k12650
de Rooij R, Kuhl E, 2016. Constitutive modeling of brain tissue: current perspectives. Appl Mech Rev, 68(1):010801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032436
Devaiah AK, Andreoli MT, 2009. Treatment of esthesioneuroblastoma: a 16-year meta-analysis of 361 patients. Laryngoscope, 119(7): 1412–1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20280
Eichberg DG, Di L, Shah AH, et al., 2020. Use of tubular retractors for minimally invasive resection of deep-seated cavernomas. Oper Neurosurg, 18(6):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz184
Eloy JA, Vivero RJ, Hoang K, et al., 2009. Comparison of transnasal endoscopic and open craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope, 119(5):834–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20186
Fu TS, Monteiro E, Muhanna N, et al., 2016. Comparison of outcomes for open versus endoscopic approaches for olfactory neuroblastoma: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Head Neck, 38(S1): E2306–E2316. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24233
Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B, et al., 2005. Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: report of an international collaborative study. Head Neck, 27(6):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20166
Garg A, Dwivedi RC, Sayed S, et al., 2010. Robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: a review. Oral Oncol, 46(8):571–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.04.005
Golahmadi AK, Khan DZ, Mylonas GP, et al., 2021. Tool-tissue forces in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg, 65: 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102268
Hannaford B, Rosen J, Friedman DW, et al., 2013. Raven-II: an open platform for surgical robotics research. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 60(4):954–959. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2228858
Hoshide R, Calayag M, Meltzer H, et al., 2017. Robot-assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy: institutional experience in 9 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 20(2):125–133. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.PEDS16636
Iwata H, Sato K, Tatewaki K, et al., 2011. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: high local control with low toxicity. Neuro Oncol, 13(8):916–922. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor055
Kim Y, Parada GA, Liu SD, et al., 2019. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Sci Robot, 4(33):eaax7329. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIROBOTICS.AAX7329
Marenco-Hillembrand L, Prevatt C, Suarez-Meade P, et al., 2020. Minimally invasive surgical outcomes for deep-seated brain lesions treated with different tubular retraction systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg, 143:537–545.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.115
Nelson JH, Brackett SL, Oluigbo CO, et al., 2020. Robotic stereotactic assistance (ROSA) for pediatric epilepsy: a single-center experience of 23 consecutive cases. Children, 7(8):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7080094
Nicolai P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, et al., 2008. Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol, 22(3):308–316. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3170
O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, 2007. Robotic anterior and mid-line skull base surgery: preclinical investigations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 69(2):S125–S128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.028
Ramorino G, Gobetti A, Cornacchia G, et al., 2022. Effect of static offsets on the nonlinear dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 130:105204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105204
Rashid B, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD, 2013. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in simple shear at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 28:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.017
Rawal RB, Farzal Z, Federspiel JJ, et al., 2016. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 155(3): 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816646968
RosenØrn J, Diemer NH, 1988. The influence of intermittent versus continuous brain retractor pressure on regional cerebral blood flow and neuropathology in the rat. Acta Neurochir, 93:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01409896
Shapiro SZ, Sabacinski KA, Mansour SA, et al., 2020. Use of Vycor tubular retractors in the management of deep brain lesions: a review of current studies. World Neurosurg, 133:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.217
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al., 2021. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654
Smith JA, Jivraj J, Wong R, et al., 2016. 30 years of neurosurgical robots: review and trends for manipulators and associated navigational systems. Ann Biomed Eng, 44(4): 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1475-4
Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, et al., 2015. European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc, 29(2):253–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9.
Zagzoog N, Reddy K, 2020. Modern brain retractors and surgical brain injury: a review. World Neurosurg, 142:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.153
Zhong J, Dujovny M, Perlin AR, et al., 2003. Brain retraction injury. Neurol Res, 25(8):831–838. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164103771953925
Acknowledgments
The Authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge and thus can improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude. The authors acknowledge the Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology of the Medical University of Vienna for the provision of the anatomical specimen. The Authors will always be thankful to Prof. Luigi Fabrizio RODELLA, who was full professor of anatomy at the University of Medicine of Brescia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author contributions
Designed the study: Elena ROCA and Giorgio RAMORINO; Analysed and interpreted the data: Elena ROCA, Giorgio RAMORINO, Anna GOBETTI, and Giovanna CORNACCHIA; Designed the figures: Elena ROCA, Giorgio RAMORINO, and Anna GOBETTI; Wrote and edited manuscript: Elena ROCA, Giorgio RAMORINO, Anna GOBETTI, Giovanna CORNACCHIA, Oscar VIVALDI, and Barbara BUFFOLI. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript, and therefore, have full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity and security of the data.
Compliance with ethics guidelines
Elena ROCA, Anna GOBETTI, Giovanna CORNACCHIA, Oscar VIVALDI, Barbara BUFFOLI, and Giorgio RAMORINO declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The donor provided written informed consent before death for the body to use in medical education and research. The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roca, E., Gobetti, A., Cornacchia, G. et al. An expandable chamber for safe brain retraction: new technologies in the field of transcranial endoscopic surgery. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 24, 326–335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2200557
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2200557
Key words
- Brain retraction
- Spatula
- Brain retractor design
- Brain retraction injury
- Retraction complication
- Transcranial endoscopic surgery