Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gasless laparoscopy for benign gynecological diseases using an abdominal wall-lifting system

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The use of gasless laparoscopy with an abdominal wall-lifting device for benign gynecological diseases was compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

Methods

From February 2007 to July 2007, 76 women with uterine and/or adnexal benign diseases and candidates for laparoscopic surgery were recruited in this study. Thirty-two women underwent gasless laparoscopic surgery and 44 women underwent pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery.

Results

Diverse pathologies, including adnexal cyst, uterine myoma and ectopic pregnancy, were treated successfully with gasless laparoscopic surgery. Compared with the patients in the pneumoperitoneum group, the similar hospital stay (P=0.353) and intraoperative blood loss (P=0.157) were observed. However, the mean operative time in the gasless group was significantly longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.003). No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were found in either group, except for one case of laparotomic conversion in the pneumoperitoneum group due to dense pelvic adhesions. The total hospital charges were significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.001). In 38 cases of ovarian cyst resection, the mean operative time in the gasless group remained longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.017). The total hospital charges were also significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our preliminary results demonstrated that the laparoscopic procedure using the gasless technique was a safe, effective method to treat benign gynecological diseases. Moreover, it was easy to master. As a minimally invasive treatment, gasless laparoscopic surgery provides a good choice to patients in the undeveloped regions in China without increasing the patients’ and the government’s burden significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alijani, A., Cuschieri, A., 2001. Abdominal wall lift systems in laparoscopic surgery: gasless and low-pressure systems. Semin. Laparosc. Surg., 8(1):53–62. [doi:10.1053/slas.2001.23180]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bojahr, B., Lober, R., Straube, W., Kohler, G., 1996. Gasless laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 3(4):S4–S5. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80141-1]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, A.K., Moll, F.H., McColl, M.B., Reich, H., 1993. Mechanical peritoneal retraction as a replacement for carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1(1):62–66. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80762-5]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, A., Melgrati, L., Marziali, M., Sesti, F., 2003. Gasless laparoscopic myomectomy. Indications, surgical technique and advantages of a new procedure for removing uterine leiomyomas. J. Reprod. Med., 48(10): 792–798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, A., Melgrati, L., Franzoni, G., Stepanyan, M., Bonifacio, S., Sesti, F., 2006. Isobaric gasless laparoscopic myomectomy for removal of large uterine leiomyomas. Surg. Endosc., 20(9):1406–1409. [doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9078-4]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, G.W., Stanford, E., Korn, A., 2004. Prospective trial of gasless laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using conventional surgical instruments. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 11(2):197–203. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60199-5]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J.M., Maurer, W.G., 1997. A randomized comparison of gasless laparoscopy and CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Obstet. Gynecol., 90(3):416–420. [doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00279-2]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guido, R.S., Brooks, K., McKenzie, R., Gruss, J., Krohn, M.A., 1998. A randomized, prospective comparison of pain after gasless laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 5(2):149–153. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(98)80081-9]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D.J., Maher, P.J., Wood, E.C., 1994. Gasless laparoscopy-useless or useful? J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1(3):265–268. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)81021-7]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J.K., Chen, W.S., Yang, S.H., Lin, T.C., Lin, J.K., 2001. Gasless laparoscopy-assisted colorectal surgery. Surg. Endosc., 15(10):1093–1097. [doi:10.1007/s004640080148]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P.L., Sibert, K.S., 1997. Laparoscopy. Gasless vs. CO2 pneumoperitoneum. J. Reprod. Med., 42(5):255–259.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruschinski, D., Homburg, S., 2005. Lift-(gasless) laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia. Surg. Technol. Int., 14(5):193–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruschinski, D., Homburg, S., Wockel, A., Kapur, A., Reich, H., 2004. Lift-laparoscopic total hysterectomy as a routine procedure. Surg. Technol. Int., 13:147–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J.F., Ejstrud, P., Kristensen, J.U., Svendsen, F., Redke, F., Pedersen, V., 2001. Randomized comparison of conventional and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative technique, postoperative course, and recovery. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 5(3):330–335. [doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80056-1]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Hao, J., Gao, X., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Chen, Y., Wu, J., 2001. Gynecological procedures under gasless laparoscopy. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 114(5):514–516.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lukban, J.C., Jaeger, J., Hammond, K.C., LoBraico, D.A., Gordon, A.M., Graebe, R.A., 2000. Gasless versus conventional laparoscopy. N. J. Med., 97(5):29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H., Kobori, Y., Goseki, N., Inoue, H., Takeshita, K., Endo, M., Nakamura, T., 1996. Fishing-rod-type abdominal wall lifter for gasless laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc., 10(9):944–946. [doi:10.1007/BF00188492]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara, Y., Isshiki, A., Kindscher, J.D., Goto, H., 1999. Abdominal wall lift versus carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic resection of ovarian tumors. J. Clin. Anesth., 11(5):406–412. [doi:10.1016/S0952-8180(99)00068-9]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oguri, H., Taniguchi, K., Fukaya, T., 2005. Gasless laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts during pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 91(3):258–259. [doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.014]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semm, K., 1978. Tissue-puncher and loop-ligation-new aids for surgical-therapeutic pelviscopy (laparoscopy)= endoscopic intraabdominal surgery. Endoscopy, 10(2): 119–124. [doi:10.1055/s-0028-1098278]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semm, K., 1979. New methods of pelviscopy (gynecologic laparoscopy) for myomectomy, ovariectomy, tubectomy and adnectomy. Endoscopy, 11(2):85–93. [doi:10.1055/s-0028-1098329]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sesti, F., Melgrati, L., Damiani, A., Piccione, E., 2006. Isobaric (gasless) laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. An overview. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 129(1): 9–14. [doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.027]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sesti, F., Capobianco, F., Capozzolo, T., Pietropolli, A., Piccione, E., 2008. Isobaric gasless laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in uterine myomectomy: a randomized trial. Surg. Endosc., 22(4):917–923. [doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9516-1]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.S., Fry, W.R., Tsoi, E.K., Henderson, V.J., Hirvela, E.R., Koehler, R.H., Brams, D.M., Morabito, D.J., Peskin, G.W., 1993. Gasless laparoscopy and conventional instruments. The next phase of minimally invasive surgery. Arch. Surg., 128(10):1102–1107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, A., Sakai, K., Mitsui, T., Nakamura, H., 2007. Management of large cystic adnexal tumor by gasless laparoscopic-assisted surgery with wound retractor. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 14(5):644–650. [doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.003]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tintara, H., Choobun, T., 2004. Laparoscopic adnexectomy for benign tubo-ovarian disease using abdominal wall lift: a comparison to laparotomy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 84(2):147–155. [doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00261-3]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tintara, H., Leetanaporn, R., Getpook, C., Suntharasaj, T., 1998. Simplified abdominal wall-lifting device for gasless laparoscopy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 61(2):165–170. [doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00023-X]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Topel, H.C., 1994. Gasless laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy with epidural anesthesia. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1(4 Part 2):S36. [doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80986-7]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Cui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Cui, H., Zhao, Y. et al. Gasless laparoscopy for benign gynecological diseases using an abdominal wall-lifting system. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 10, 805–812 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820122

Key words

CLC number

Navigation