Abstract
Water conveyance tunnels usually experience high internal water pressures and complex soil conditions. Therefore, shield tunnels with double-lining structure have been adopted because of their high bearing capacity. The effect of the interface between the segmental and inner linings on the bearing capacity has been widely investigated; however, the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity has not been emphasized enough. Therefore, in this study, model tests and an analytical solution are presented to elucidate the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity. First, model tests are conducted on double-lining models under sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstone conditions. The internal force and earth pressure under these different soil conditions are then compared to reveal the contribution of soil to the internal water pressure bearing capacity. Following this, an analytical solution, considering the soil—double-lining interaction, is proposed to further investigate the contribution of the soil. The analytical solution is verified with model tests. The analytical solution is in good agreement with the model test results and can be used to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the double-lining and soil contribution. The effect of soil on the bearing capacity is found to be related with the elastic modulus of the soil and the deformation state of the double-lining. Before the double-lining cracks, the sandy soil contributes 3.7% of the internal water pressure but the contribution of the soil rises to 10.4% when it is the highly weathered argillaceous siltstone. After the double-lining cracks, the soil plays an important role in bearing internal water pressure. The soil contributions of sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstones are 10.5% and 27.8%, respectively. The effect of soil should be considered in tunnel design with the internal water pressure.
摘要
目的
盾构隧道双层衬砌广泛应用于输水隧道,然而围岩的承载作用一直被忽略。本文通过模型试验揭示围岩-双层衬砌的共同承载特性,为高内水压输水隧道的围岩-双层衬砌共同承载设计方法提供支撑。
创新点
1. 揭示围岩条件对围岩-双层衬砌联合承载能力的影响规律;2. 建立围岩-双层衬砌联合承载理论解析方法。
方法
1. 通过模型实验,分析不同围岩条件下(砂性土、强风化泥质粉砂岩)双层衬砌内水压受力变形特性,并确定围岩和双层衬砌内水压承载比例以及围岩对双层衬砌承载能力的影响(图1和2);2. 通过解析方法,揭示围岩承载比例随围岩弹性模量的变化规律(图22和23),并提出承载比例的内衬厚度优化设计方法。
结论
1. 内水压作用下,围岩承载能力与围岩弹性模量和衬砌变形状态有关;双层衬砌未开裂时,砂性土围岩承担3.7%的内水压,而围岩为强风化岩石时,其贡献上升至10.4%;双层衬砌开裂后,围岩在承受内水压方面起着更重要作用,即砂性土和强风化岩石的分担比分别为10.5%和27.8%。2. 隧道设计中应考虑围岩承载内水压能力的影响。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CEB (Comité Euro-International du Beton), 1985. CEB Design Manual on Cracking and Deformation. Bulletin d’information No. 158, Paris, France.
Chen QJ, Wang JC, Huang WM, et al., 2020. Analytical solution for a jointed shield tunnel lining reinforced by secondary linings. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 185:105813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105813
Guo CX, Han KH, Shi LL, et al., 2019. Superiority analysis of composite structure of initial lining segment and secondary lining molded concrete. Journal of Coastal Research, 83(S1):300–304. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI83-049.1
Guo R, Zhang MY, Xie HM, et al., 2019. Model test study of the mechanical characteristics of the lining structure for an urban deep drainage shield tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 91:103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103014
Huang X, Liu W, Zhang ZX, et al., 2019. Exploring the three-dimensional response of a water storage and sewage tunnel based on full-scale loading tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 88:156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.003
Huang X, Liu W, Zhang ZX, et al., 2020. Structural behavior of segmental tunnel linings for a large stormwater storage tunnel: insight from full-scale loading tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 99:103376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103376
Huang ZK, Zhang DM, Pitilakis K, et al., 2022a. Resilience assessment of tunnels: framework and application for tunnels in alluvial deposits exposed to seismic hazard. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 162:107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107456
Huang ZK, Argyroudis S, Zhang DM, et al., 2022b. Time-dependent fragility functions for circular tunnels in soft soils. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 8(3): 04022030. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001251
Li SH, Zhang MJ, Li PF, 2021. Analytical solutions to ground settlement induced by ground loss and construction loadings during curved shield tunneling. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 22(4):296–313. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000120
Liu DJ, Wang F, Zhang DM, et al., 2019. Interfacial stresses of shield tunnel strengthened by a thin plate at inner surface. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 91: 103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103021
Schleiss AJ, 1997. Design of reinforced concrete lining for pressure tunnels and shafts. International Journal on Hydropower and Dams, 4(3):88–94.
Simanjuntak TDYF, Marence M, Mynett AE, et al., 2014. Pressure tunnels in non-uniform in situ stress conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 42:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.03.006
Song F, Wang HN, Jiang MJ, 2018. Analytical solutions for lined circular tunnels in viscoelastic rock considering various interface conditions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 55:109–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.031
Stramandinoli RSB, La Rovere HL, 2008. An efficient tension-stiffening model for nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete members. Engineering Structures, 30(7):2069–2080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.022
Su J, Bloodworth A, 2016. Interface parameters of composite sprayed concrete linings in soft ground with spray-applied waterproofing. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 59:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.006
Takamatsu N, Murakami H, Koizumi A, 1992. A study on the bending behaviour in the longitudinal direction of shield tunnels with secondary linings. Proceedings of the International Congress Towards New Worlds in Tunnelling, p.277–285.
Wang SM, Jian YQ, Lu XX, et al., 2019a. Study on load distribution characteristics of secondary lining of shield under different construction time. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 89:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.010
Wang SM, Ruan L, Shen XZ, et al., 2019b. Investigation of the mechanical properties of double lining structure of shield tunnel with different joint surface. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 90:404–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.04.011
Working Group No. 2, International Tunnelling Association, 2000. Guidelines for the design of shield tunnel lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 15(3): 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00058-4
Yan QX, Yao CF, Yang WB, et al., 2015. An improved numerical model of shield tunnel with double lining and its applications. Advance in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015:430879. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/430879
Yang F, Cao SR, Qin G, 2018. Mechanical behavior of two kinds of prestressed composite linings: a case study of the Yellow River crossing tunnel in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 79:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.036
Zhai WZ, Chapman D, Zhang DM, et al., 2020. Experimental study on the effectiveness of strengthening over-deformed segmental tunnel lining by steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 104:103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103530
Zhang HM, Guo C, Lv GL, 2001a. Mechanical model for shield pressure tunnel with secondary linings. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 32(4):28–33 (in Chinese).
Zhang HM, Che FX, Xia MY, 2001b. Study on loads test of shied tunnel segment reinforced by double linings. Journal of Tongji University, 29(7):779–783 (in Chinese).
Zhang JZ, Huang HW, Zhang DM, et al., 2021. Effect of ground surface surcharge on deformational performance of tunnel in spatially variable soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 136:104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104229
Zhang XD, Wang JC, Chen QJ, et al., 2021. Analytical method for segmental tunnel linings reinforced by secondary lining considering interfacial slippage and detachment. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(6):04021084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002025
Zhou YF, Su K, Wu HG, 2015. Hydro-mechanical interaction analysis of high pressure hydraulic tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 47:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.12.004
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No. 2019-01-0700-07-456 E00051), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51978517, 52090082, and 52108381), and the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Program (Nos. 21DZ1200601 and 20DZ1201404).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dong-mei ZHANG designed the research. Xiang-hong BU, Jian PANG, and Wen-ding ZHOU conducted the model test for double-lining and processed the corresponding data. Jian PANG and Xiang-hong BU wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Yan JIANG, Kai JIA, and Guang-hua YANG helped to organize the manuscript. Dong-mei ZHANG and Xiang-hong BU revised and edited the final version.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of interest
Dong-mei ZHANG, Xiang-hong BU, Jian PANG, Wending ZHOU, Yan JIANG, Kai JIA, and Guang-hua YANG declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Dm., Bu, Xh., Pang, J. et al. Soil effect on the bearing capacity of a double-lining structure under internal water pressure. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 23, 863–881 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200215
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200215