Abstract
Unstart is an unwanted flow phenomenon in a hypersonic inlet. When an unstart occurs, the captured airflow flowing through the engine significantly decreases with strong unsteady characteristics, which may lead to thrust loss or even combustor flameout. In this study, various bump configurations were designed to be integrated with a hypersonic inlet to improve its starting ability. A bump was defined as an integrated 3D compression surface installed upstream of the inlet entrance. The starting processes of these bump inlets were numerically simulated to investigate the effect laws and flow mechanisms of the bump parameters. Tests on bump height revealed that the starting performance could be significantly improved by increasing bump height, with the starting Mach number decreasing by 0.55 for the inlet with the highest bump. The high bump facilitates the side movement of the subsonic flow in the separation zone, which leads to a small separation bubble, thus accelerating the starting process. Further, the starting ability can be improved by designing a relatively wide bump, which results in a decline in the starting Mach number by 0.44. When the bump has the same or greater width compared with the airflow capture range, a growing spillage along the transverse direction can be formed so that the airflow in the separation bubble can be easily excluded, improving the starting ability.
概要
目 的
在高超声速进气道中加入鼓包构型可有效提高起动性能, 然而目前对于鼓包构型对起动的影响规律及其流动机理的认识还不充分. 本文旨在研究鼓包构型参数对起动性能的影响, 明晰鼓包对起动过程的作用机理, 进而为高超声速鼓包进气道的设计提供参考依据.
创新点
1. 获得了鼓包高度和宽度对起动性能的影响规律; 2. 明晰了鼓包对不起动进气道大尺度分离区的重构作用, 并阐释了鼓包参数影响起动性能的内在机理.
方 法
1. 利用基于横向压力梯度的鼓包进气道设计方法生成具有不同鼓包高度和宽度的进气道构型; 2. 采用数值方法计算不同的鼓包进气道在设计条件下的流场和起动过程, 分析鼓包对进气道性能影响规律; 3. 通过分析不起动流场结构, 研究鼓包对大尺度分离区的重构作用.
结 论
1. 鼓包可对边界层气流产生排移作用, 使得进气道流量稍有下降, 但总压恢复性能明显提升; 2. 增加鼓包高度可加速分离区内气流的横向溢流, 进而提高进气道起动性能; 3. 为提高起动性能, 应使鼓包略宽于进气道入口.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brito Lopes AV, 2021. Advanced Modelling of Turbulent Spray Flames in Aero Gas-Turbines with Liquid Bio-Fuels. PhD Thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Brito Lopes AV, Emekwuru N, Bonello B, et al., 2020. On the highly swirling flow through a confined bluff-body. Physics of Fluids, 32(5):055105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141531
Chang JT, Li N, Xu KJ, et al., 2017. Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 89:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.001
Colliss SP, Babinsky H, Nübler K, et al., 2014. Joint experimental and numerical approach to three-dimensional shock control bump research. AIAA Journal, 52(2):436–446. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052582
Curran ET, 2001. Scramjet engines: the first forty years. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17(6):1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5875
Devara MKK, Jutur P, Rao SMV, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation of unstart dynamics driven by subsonic spillage in a hypersonic scramjet intake at Mach 6. Physics of Fluids, 32(2):026103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135096
Erdem E, Kontis K, 2010. Numerical and experimental investigation of transverse injection flows. Shock Waves, 20(2): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-010-0247-1
Hamstra JW, Sylvester TG, 1998. System and Method for Diverting Boundary Layer Air. US Patent 5779189.
Im S, Baccarella D, McGann B, et al., 2016. Unstart phenomena induced by mass addition and heat release in a model scramjet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 797:604–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.282
Kantrowitz A, Donaldson CD, 1945. Preliminary Investigation of Supersonic Diffusers. NACA Wartime Report No. L5D20, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, USA.
Kim SD, 2009. Aerodynamic design of a supersonic inlet with a parametric bump. Journal of Aircraft, 46(1):198–202. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37416
Kim SD, Song DJ, 2007. A numerical analysis on three-dimensional flow field in a supersonic bump-type inlet. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21(2): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916293
Li LQ, Huang W, Yan L, et al., 2018. Mixing improvement induced by the combination of a micro-ramp with an air porthole in the transverse gaseous injection flow field. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 124: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.061
Liu J, Yuan HC, Wang YF, et al., 2017. Unsteady supercritical/critical dual flowpath inlet flow and its control methods. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 30(6):1877–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.10.007
Liu JB, Fan XQ, Tao Y, et al., 2019. Experimental and numerical study on the local unstart mechanism of hypersonic inlet. Acta Astronautica, 160:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.041
Mahoney JJ, 1990. Inlets for Supersonic Missiles. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, USA.
Molder S, Timofeev EV, Tahir RB, 2004. Flow starting in high compression hypersonic air inlets by mass spillage. Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-4130
Reardon JP, Schetz JA, Lowe KT, 2021. Computational analysis of unstart in variable-geometry inlet. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 37(4):564–576. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B38214
Rodriguez CG, 2003. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the central institute of aviation motors/NASA scram-jet. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 19(4):547–555. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6165
Simon PC, Brown DW, Huff RG, 1957. Performance of External-Compression Bump Inlet at Mach Number of 1.5 to 2.0. NACA RM E56L19, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, USA.
Su WY, Chen Y, Zhang FR, et al., 2018. Control of pseudo-shock oscillation in scramjet inlet-isolator using periodical excitation. Acta Astronautica, 143:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.10.040
Svensson M, 2008. A CFD Investigation of a Generic Bump and Its Application to a Diverterless Supersonic Inlet. MS Thesis, Swedish Defense Research Agency, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sziroczak D, Smith H, 2016. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 84:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.04.001
Teng J, Yuan HC, 2015. Variable geometry cowl sidewall for improving rectangular hypersonic inlet performance. Aerospace Science and Technology, 42:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.011
Tillotson BJ, Loth E, Dutton JC, et al., 2009. Experimental study of a Mach 3 bump-compression flowfield. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 25(3):545–554. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.35306
Voland RT, Auslender AH, Smart MK, et al., 1999. CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 scramjet flight and ground test. Proceedings of the 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-4848
Walker S, Rodgers F, Esposita A, 2005. The hypersonic collaborative Australia/United States experiment (HyCAUSE). Proceedings of the AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-3254
Walker S, Rodgers F, Paull A, et al., 2008. HyCAUSE flight test program. Proceedings of the 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-2580
Wang Y, Liang JH, Fan XQ, et al., 2009. Investigation on the unstarted flowfield of a three-dimensional sidewall compression hypersonic inlet. Proceedings of the 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-7404
Xie WZ, Guo RW, 2008. A ventral diverterless high offset S-shaped inlet at transonic speeds. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 21(3):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60027-8
Xu SC, Wang Y, Wang ZG, et al., 2017. The design and analysis of bump in high speed supersonic flow. Proceedings of the 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-2269
Xu SC, Wang Y, Wang ZG, et al., 2019. Design and analysis of a hypersonic inlet with an integrated bump/forebody. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 32(10):2267–2274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.010
Xu SC, Wang Y, Wang ZG, et al., 2022. Design method for hypersonic bump inlet based on transverse pressure gradient. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23(6):479–494. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2100532
Yu ZH, Huang GP, Xia C, 2018. Inverse design and Mach 6 experimental investigation of a pressure controllable bump. Aerospace Science and Technology, 81:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.006
Yu ZH, Huang GP, Xia C, 2020. 3D inverse method of characteristics for hypersonic bump-inlet integration. Acta Astronautica, 166:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.015
Yuan YC, Liu FZ, Wang X, et al., 2021. Design and analysis of a supersonic axisymmetric inlet based on controllable bleed slots. Aerospace Science and Technology, 118:107008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107008
Zhang BH, Zhao XY, Liu J, 2020. Effects of bleed hole size on supersonic boundary layer bleed mass flow rate. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(8):652–662. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900507
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12102470) and the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate (No. CX20200082), China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shang-cheng XU, Yi WANG, and Zhen-guo WANG designed the research. Shang-cheng XU and Bing XIONG processed the corresponding data. Shang-cheng XU wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Xiao-qiang FAN and Bing XIONG helped to organize the manuscript. Yi WANG revised and edited the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Shang-cheng XU, Yi WANG, Zhen-guo WANG, Xiao-qiang FAN, and Bing XIONG declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Sc., Wang, Y., Wang, Zg. et al. Effects of bump parameters on hypersonic inlet starting performance. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 23, 807–819 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200155
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200155