Abstract
A sink vortex is a common physical phenomenon in continuous casting, chemical extraction, water conservancy, and other industrial processes, and often causes damage and loss in production. Therefore, the real-time monitoring of the sink vortex state is important for improving industrial production efficiency. However, its suction-extraction phenomenon and shock vibration characteristics in the course of its formation are complex mechanical dynamic factors for flow field state monitoring. To address this issue, we set up a multi-physics model using the level set method (LSM) for a free sink vortex to study the two-phase interaction mechanism. Then, a fluid–solid coupling dynamic model was deduced to investigate the shock vibration characteristics and reveal the transition mechanism of the critical flow state. The numerical results show that the coupling energy shock induces a pressure oscillation phenomenon, which appears to be a transient enhancement of vibration at the vortex penetration state. The central part of the transient enhancement signal is a high-frequency signal. Based on the dynamic coupling model, an experimental observation platform was established to verify the accuracy of the numerical results. The water-model experiment results were accordant with the numerical results. The above results provide a reference for fluid state recognition and active vortex control for industrial monitoring systems, such as those in aerospace pipe transport, hydropower generation, and microfluidic devices.
摘要
目 的
汇流旋涡的实时监测可有效促进冶金精炼、 燃料系统、 水力发电等工业场景的提质增效. 本文旨在建立两相旋涡流固耦合模型, 获取壁面冲击振动信号和提取旋涡贯穿特征, 以期为工业防涡和抑涡提供理论参考与技术支持.
创新点
1. 建立了涡流力学模型, 得到了临界贯入状态的规律; 2. 建立了流固耦合模型, 得到了涡激振动信号; 3. 提出了一种基于四方程的振动响应求解方法.
方 法
1. 采用水平集方法, 建立自由汇流旋涡模型来研究气液两相作用机理; 2. 建立流固耦合动力学模型, 研究冲击振动特性, 并揭示临界流动状态的转变机理; 3. 搭建实验观测平台, 验证数值计算结果的准确性.
结 论
1. 涡流耦合能量引起的压力振荡是流固冲击振动产生的根本原因; 2. 旋涡达到临界穿透状态时, 两相耦合引起的压力振荡导致各频率信号显著增强, 且高频波段尤为明显; 3. 根据流体动力学相似理论搭建的实验平台可基于冲击振动特性实现对汇流旋涡的实时监测.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen A, Bohr T, Stenum B, et al., 2003. Anatomy of a bathtub vortex. Physical Review Letters, 91(10):104502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.104502
Andersen A, Bohr T, Stenum B, et al., 2006. The bathtub vortex in a rotating container. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 556: 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006009463
Balcázar N, Lehmkuhl O, Jofre L, et al., 2015. Level-set simulations of buoyancy-driven motion of single and multiple bubbles. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 56:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.07.004
Cao LX, Liu J, Lu C, et al., 2022. Efficient inverse method for structural identification considering modeling and response uncertainties. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00756-7
Chen JL, Xu F, Tan DP, et al., 2015. A control method for agricultural greenhouses heating based on computational fluid dynamics and energy prediction model. Applied Energy, 141:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.026
Cristofano L, Nobili M, Romano GP, et al., 2016. Investigation on bathtub vortex flow field by particle image velocimetry. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 74:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.005
Fan XH, Tan DP, Li L, et al., 2021. Modeling and solution method of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow mixing. Acta Physica Sinica, 70(12):124501 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.70.20202126
Ge JQ, Ji SM, Tan DP, 2018. A gas-liquid-solid three-phase abrasive flow processing method based on bubble collapsing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1–4):1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1250-9
Jeong JT, 2012. Free-surface deformation due to spiral flow owing to a source/sink and a vortex in Stokes flow. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 26(1):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-011-0226-x
Ji SM, Weng XX, Tan DP, 2012. Analytical method of softness abrasive two-phase flow field based on 2D model of LSM. Acta Physica Sinica, 61(1):010205 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.61.010205
Kaiser JWJ, Adami S, Akhatov IS, et al., 2020. A semi-implicit conservative sharp-interface method for liquid-solid phase transition. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 155:119800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119800
Kinzel MP, Lindau JW, Kunz RF, 2018. A multiphase level-set approach for all-Mach numbers. Computers & Fluids, 167: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.02.026
Koria SC, Kanth U, 1994. Model studies of slag carry-over during drainage of metallurgical vessels. Steel Research, 65(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.199400919
Li HX, Wang Q, Jiang JW, et al., 2016. Analysis of factors affecting free surface vortex formation during steel teeming. ISIJ International, 56(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2015-096
Li L, Qi H, Yin ZC, et al., 2020. Investigation on the multiphase sink vortex Ekman pumping effects by CFD-DEM coupling method. Powder Technology, 360:462–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.06.036
Li L, Tan DP, Yin ZC, et al., 2021. Investigation on the multiphase vortex and its fluid-solid vibration characters for sustainability production. Renewable Energy, 175:887–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.027
Li L, Tan YF, Xu WX, et al., 2023a. Fluid-induced transport dynamics and vibration patterns of multiphase vortex in the critical transition states. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 252:108376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108376
Li L, Xu WX, Tan YF, et al., 2023b. Fluid-induced vibration evolution mechanism of multiphase free sink vortex and the multi-source vibration sensing method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 189:110058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110058
Li L, Lu B, Xu WX, et al., 2023c. Mechanism of multiphase coupling transport evolution of free sink vortex. Acta Physica Sinica, 72(3):034702 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.72.20221991
Li L, Gu ZH, Xu WX, et al., 2023d. Mixing mass transfer mechanism and dynamic control of gas-liquid-solid multiphase flow based on VOF-DEM coupling. Energy, 272: 127015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127015
Lin QL, Liu L, Zhu WQ, 2022. Formation mechanism of precursor films at high temperatures: a review. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00686-4
Lu JF, Wang T, Li L, et al., 2020. Dynamic characteristics and wall effects of bubble bursting in gas-liquid-solid three-phase particle flow. Processes, 8(7):760. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8070760
Lundgren TS, 1985. The vortical flow above the drain-hole in a rotating vessel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 155:381–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085001860
Luo K, Shao CX, Yang Y, et al., 2015. A mass conserving level set method for detailed numerical simulation of liquid atomization. Journal of Computational Physics, 298:495–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.009
Lyu HP, Zhang LB, Tan DP, et al., 2023. A collaborative assembly for low-voltage electrical apparatuses. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 24(6):890–905. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2100423
Mikota G, Mikota J, 2020. Energy related model correlation criteria for modal analysis of fluid-structure interaction systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 483:115480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115480
Morales RD, Dávila-Maldonado O, Calderón I, et al., 2013. Physical and mathematical models of vortex flows during the last stages of steel draining operations from a ladle. ISIJ International, 53(5):782–791. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.53.782
Pan Y, Ji SM, Tan DP, et al., 2020. Cavitation-based soft abrasive flow processing method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109(9–12):2587–2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05836-3
Sam P, Antonin C, Richartz M, et al., 2018. Black hole quasi-bound states from a draining bathtub vortex flow. Physical Review Letters, 121(6):061101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.061101
Sangalli LA, Braun AL, 2020. A fluid-structure interaction model for numerical simulation of bridge flutter using sectional models with active control devices. Preliminary results. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 477:115338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115338
Sleiti AK, 2020. Isobaric expansion engines powered by low-grade heat—working fluid performance and selection database for power and thermomechanical refrigeration. Energy Technology, 8(11):2000613. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202000613
Tan DP, Li PY, Ji YX, et al., 2013. SA-ANN-based slag carryover detection method and the embedded WME platform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(10):4702–4713. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2012.2213559
Tan DP, Yang T, Zhao J, et al., 2016. Free sink vortex Ekman suction-extraction evolution mechanism. Acta Physica Sinica, 65(5):054701 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.65.054701
Tan DP, Ni YS, Zhang LB, 2017. Two-phase sink vortex suction mechanism and penetration dynamic characteristics in ladle teeming process. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 24(7):669–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30101-2
Tan DP, Li L, Zhu YL, et al., 2018. An embedded cloud database service method for distributed industry monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(7):2881–2893. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2773644
Tan DP, Li L, Zhu YL, et al., 2019. Critical penetration condition and Ekman suction-extraction mechanism of a sink vortex. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 20(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1800260
Tan DP, Li L, Yin ZC, et al., 2020. Ekman boundary layer mass transfer mechanism of free sink vortex. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 150:119250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119250
Turkyilmazoglu M, 2011. Wall stretching in magnetohydrodynamics rotating flows in inertial and rotating frames. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 25(4):606–613. https://doi.org/10.2514/LT3750
Turkyilmazoglu M, 2018. Flow and heat due to a surface formed by a vortical source. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 68:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.11.010
Wang T, Wang CY, Yin YX, et al., 2023. Analytical approach for nonlinear vibration response of the thin cylindrical shell with a straight crack. Nonlinear Dynamics, 111(12):10957–10980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08460-4
Wang YY, Zhang YL, Tan DP, et al., 2021. Key technologies and development trends in advanced intelligent sawing equipments. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 34(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-021-00547-6
Yuan SY, Tang HW, Xiao Y, et al., 2016. Turbulent flow structure at a 90-degree open channel confluence: accounting for the distortion of the shear layer. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 12:130–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.05.006
Zheng SH, Yu YK, Qiu MZ, et al., 2021. A modal analysis of vibration response of a cracked fluid-filled cylindrical shell. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 91:934–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.040
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52175124 and 52305139), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LZ21E050003), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Zhejiang Provincial Universities (No. RF-C2020004), and the Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems (No. GZKF-202125), China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dapeng TAN conceived and designed the research. Zichao YIN and Lin LI performed the simulations. Tong WANG analyzed the data. Jiafeng WU and Yesha NI contributed analysis tools and provided the research platform. All authors have read the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Zichao YIN, Yesha NI, Lin LI, Tong WANG, Jiafeng WU, Zhe LI, and Dapeng TAN declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Electronic supplementary materials
Sections S1 and S2
Electronic Supplementary Materials
11582_2024_529_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Numerical modelling and experimental investigation of a two-phase sink vortex and its fluid-solid vibration characteristics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, Z., Ni, Y., Li, L. et al. Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of a two-phase sink vortex and its fluid-solid vibration characteristics. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 25, 47–62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200014
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200014
Key words
- Free sink vortex
- Fluid–solid coupling
- Level set method (LSM)
- Multi-physics model
- Vibration characteristics