Abstract
With the increasing demand of higher travelling speed, a new streamlined high-speed maglev train has been designed to reach a speed of 600 km/h. To better capture the flow field structures around the maglev train, an improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is adopted to model the turbulence. Results show that the new maglev train has good aerodynamic load performance such as small drag coefficient contributing to energy conservation. The main frequencies of aerodynamic forces for each car have a scattered distribution. There are two pairs of counter-rotating large vortices in the non-streamlined part of the train that make the boundary layer thicker. Many high-intensity vortices are distributed in the narrow space between skirt plates or train floor and track. In the gap between the train floor and track (except near the tail car nose), the main frequency of vortex shedding remains constant and its strength increases exponentially in the streamwise direction. In the wake, the counter-rotating vortices gradually expand and reproduce some small vortices that move downward. The vortex has quite random and complex frequencydomain distribution characteristics in the wake. The maximum time-averaged velocity of the slipstream occurs near the nose of the head car, based on which, the track-side safety domain is divided.
目的
通过对新型高速磁浮车的绕流进行数值模拟,研 究气动荷载、涡流及滑流的分布规律,为常导高 速磁浮车的研发和应用奠定一定的气动基础。
创新点:1. 将可压缩流动理论及延时分离涡(IDDES)方 法应用于高速磁浮车气动问题;2. 通过数值模 拟,首次揭示高速磁浮车诱发的涡流特性。
方法:1. 基于430 km/h 的磁浮车气动试验数据,验证本 文数值方法的可靠性,并建立三编组新型高速磁 浮车的计算模型;2. 采用IDDES 方法对关键问题 即湍流求解进行建模,以捕捉较为精细的流场结 构;3. 采用时均化和快速傅里叶变换等方法对流 场数据进行后处理,以研究流场的时均和频率等 特性。
结论:1. 新型高速磁浮车具有良好的气动性能,比如较 小的阻力系数、合理的升力系数和分散性较好的 气动力主频分布。2. 在非流线型车身附近,两对 反向旋转的大涡使得边界层明显增厚。3. 高强度 的涡流主要分布在裙板与轨道以及轨道与车底 之间的狭小空间;在轨道与车底之间(除了靠近 尾车鼻尖附近的区域),涡脱频域几乎不变,且 涡强沿流向指数式增大。4. 伴随着涡流的分裂及 衍生,尾流具有复杂的、随机的频域分布特性。
5. 高速磁浮车产生的时均滑流具有5 个典型的变 化过程。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson JD, 2017. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USA, p.530–550.
ANSYS Inc., 2015. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide. ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, USA.
Bi HQ, Lei B, Zhang WH, 2004. Research on numerical calculation for aerodynamic characteristics of the TR maglev train. Journal of the China Railway Society, 26(4):51–54 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2004.04.011
Bi HQ, Lei B, Zhang WH, 2005. Numerical calculation for turbulent flow around TR maglev train. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 40(1):5–8 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2005.01.002
Chen JX, 2018. Study on Crossing Air Pressure Pulse and Aerodynamic Performance of High-speed Maglev Trains Meeting in the Open Air. MS Thesis, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China (in Chinese).
Deng ZG, Zhang Y, Wang B, et al., 2019. Present situation and prospect of evacuated tube transportation system. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5):1063–1072 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180204
Duhamel P, Vetterli M, 1990. Fast Fourier transforms: a tutorial review and a state of the art. Signal Processing, 19(4):259–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1684(90)90158-U
Hemida H, Baker C, Gao GJ, 2014. The calculation of train slipstreams using large-eddy simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409712460982
Huang S, Li ZW, Yang MZ, 2019. Aerodynamics of highspeed maglev trains passing each other in open air. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 188:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.02.025
Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P, 1988. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceeding of the Summer Program in Center for Turbulence Research, p.193–208.
Jia YX, Mei YG, 2018. Numerical simulation of pressure waves induced by high-speed maglev trains passing through tunnels. International Journal of Heat and Technology, 36(2):687–696. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360234
Lee HW, Kim KC, Lee J, 2006. Review of maglev train technologies. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42(7): 1917–1925. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.875842
Lee J, Jo J, Han Y, et al., 2014. The development and application of guideway monitoring vehicle for super speed maglev. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, p.427–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2014.6988036
Li MS, Lei B, Lin GB, et al., 2006. Field measurement of passing pressure and train induced airflow speed on high speed maglev vehicles. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 24(2): 209–212 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2006.02.013
Li RX, Liu YQ, Zhai WM, 2004. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic force in longitudinal and vertical direction for high-speed maglev train. China Railway Science, 25(1): 8–12 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2004.01.002
Li XB, Chen G, Wang Z, et al., 2019. Dynamic analysis of the flow fields around single- and double-unit trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 188: 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.02.015
Liu TH, Tian HQ, Wang CY, 2006. Aerodynamic performance comparison of several kind of nose shapes of maglev train. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 28(3):94–98 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2006.03.020
Menter FR, 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
Miao BR, Zhang WH, Chi MR, et al., 2019. Analysis and prospects of key technical features of next generation high speed trains. Journal of the China Railway Society, 41(3):58–70 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2019.03.008
Ono M, Koga S, Ohtsuki H, 2002. Japan’s superconducting maglev train. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 5(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/5289.988732
Östh J, Krajnović S, 2012. The flow around a simplified tractor-trailer model studied by large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 102:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.12.007
Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MK, et al., 2008. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wallmodelled LES capabilities. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 29(6):1638–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001
Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, et al., 2006. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 20(3):181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0
Tian HQ, 2007. Train Aerodynamics. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Wang JB, Minelli G, Dong TY, et al., 2019. The effect of bogie fairings on the slipstream and wake flow of a high-speed train. An IDDES study. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 191:183–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.010
Wang SB, Bell JR, Burton D, et al., 2017. The performance of different turbulence models (URANS, SAS and DES) for predicting high-speed train slipstream. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 165:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.001
Wang SB, Burton D, Herbst A, et al., 2018. The effect of bogies on high-speed train slipstream and wake. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 83:471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.03.013
Xia C, Wang HF, Shan XZ, et al., 2017. Effects of ground configurations on the slipstream and near wake of a high-speed train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 168:177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.005
Yan LG, 2007. The maglev development and commercial application in China. International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, p.541–548.
Zhang L, Zhang JY, Li T, et al., 2017. Multi-objective aerodynamic optimization design of high-speed train head shape. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(11):841–854. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1600764
Zhou P, Zhang J Y, Li T, 2020. Effects of blocking ratio and Mach number on aerodynamic characteristics of the evacuated tube train. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 8(1):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2019.1675191
Acknowledgements
CRRC Qiangdao Sifang, China is gratefully acknowledged for providing the geometric model of maglev train. Besides, the authors acknowledge the Supercomputing Center in National Laboratory of Rail Transportation (Building) of China for providing the computational resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Tian LI guided the turbulence modeling approach. Chun-fa ZHAO and Ji-ye ZHANG provided the critical computing resources and guided the research process. Peng ZHOU designed the research method, completed the numerical simulation, carried out the relevant data analysis, and wrote and modified the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of interest
Peng ZHOU, Tian LI, Chun-fa ZHAO, and Ji-ye ZHANG declare that they have no conflict of interest
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51605397), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFB1200602-15), and the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2019YJ0227), China
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, P., Li, T., Zhao, Cf. et al. Numerical study on the flow field characteristics of the new high-speed maglev train in open air. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 21, 366–381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900412
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900412
Key words
- Maglev train
- High-speed
- Improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES)
- Aerodynamic load
- Vortex
- Time-averaged slipstream