Skip to main content
Log in

A coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) model for methane hydrate bearing sediments using COMSOL Multiphysics

基于COMSOL Multiphysics 天然气水合物沉积物热-水-力-化多场耦合模型研究

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methane gas extraction by a deep well installed in methane hydrate bearing sediments (MHBS) found in deep subsea and permafrost regions is a coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) process. The key processes include heat convection between layers, local deformation due to compaction, and stress relaxation caused by damage of the bonded structure. As improper production may induce formation compaction, sand production, and wellbore failures, a numerical code is needed to simulate the THMC processes during methane gas production so that geomechanics and production risks can be quantified. In this study, a nonlinear THMC model was implemented in the partial differential equations (PDE) and structural mechanics module of the COMSOL Multiphysics® finite element code. This paper describes the non-linear coupled governing equations of the mechanical behavior during hydrate dissociation. In particular, it introduces a new thermodynamics-based constitutive model to simulate the mechanical behavior of hydrate bearing sediments. The performance of the newly developed code was examined by comparing the computed results with test data and other simulation results. The differences between fully coupled and semi-coupled models were analyzed. For example, heterogeneous turbidite layers observed in the Nankai Trough were modeled, and behaviors such as heat convection between different layers, shear stress and strain concentration were examined.

摘要

目的

水合物沉积物开采过程是一个热-水-力-化多场耦合过程,该过程包含了不同土层间的热对流、压缩引起的局部变形以及胶结结构破坏引起的应力松弛。不适当的开采会引起出砂、塌孔等破坏问题。本文旨在建立天然气水合物沉积物多场耦 合计算模型,以量化由开采引起的地质灾害风 险。

创新点

1. 通过COMSOL Multiphysics 实现水合物开采过程多场耦合有限元控制方程的计算;2. 建立的模型考虑变形-渗流双向全耦合过程。

方法

1. 通过理论推导,给出开采天然气水合物过程模拟的控制方程;采用偏微分方程模块实现除力学之外其他物理场的耦合计算;采用结构力学模块实现变形计算。2. 通过与试验数据进行比较验证模型的可靠性。3. 通过对比全耦合模型与半耦合 模型,分析双向耦合对水合物开采过程中沉积物 物理力学行为的影响。

结论

1. 所建立模型能够精确模拟水合物开采过程中沉积物的物理力学行为。2. 当考虑压缩对渗流的影响时,由于孔隙率的降低,计算得到的水合物分解速度要小于不考虑该影响时的速度。3. 由于存在层间对流效应,非均质模型计算得到的水合物 分解速度要快于均质模型。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi G, Ji C, Smith DH, 2004. Numerical solution for natural gas production from methane hydrate dissociation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 41(4):269–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.09.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AW, 1959. The principle of effective stress. Teknik Ukeblad, 39:859–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski WS, Paul CK, 1997. The gas hydrate detection problem: recognition of shallow-subbottom gas hazards in deep-water areas. Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/8297-MS

    Google Scholar 

  • COMSOL, 2017. Reference Manual Version 5.3. COMSOL Corporation, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Gens A, 1996. Constitutive modelling: application to compacted soils. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, p.1179–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannegan D, Todd RJ, Pritchard DM, et al., 2004. MPD-uniquely applicable to methane hydrate drilling. SPE/IADC Underbalanced Technology Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/91560-MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Kajiyama S, Yoshimoto N, et al., 2013a. Triaxial behaviour of methane hydrate bearing sand. Proceedings of the 10th ISOPE Ocean Mining and Gas Hydrates Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Li YH, Yoneda J, et al., 2013b. Mechanical behavior of gas-saturated methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(10):5185–5194. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Li YH, Yoneda J, et al., 2014. Effects of dissociation on the shear strength and deformation behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 51:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.11.015

    Google Scholar 

  • Jommi C, di Prisco C, 1994. Un semplice approccio teorico per la modellazione del comportamento meccanico dei terreni granulari parzialmente saturi. Conference Il Ruolo dei Fluidi nei Problemi di Ingegneria Geotecnica, p.167–188 (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakumoto M, Tenma N, Sakamoto Y, et al., 2011a. Development of the geo-mechanical simulation code COTHMA. Proceedings of the 9th ISOPE Ocean Mining Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakumoto M, Yoneda J, Miyazaki K, et al., 2011b. Preliminary study on well integrity during gas production from methane hydrate sediments. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath VA, 1998. A perspective on gas production from hydrates. JNOC’s Methane Hydrate International Symposium, p.20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayen RE, Lee HJ, 1993. Slope stability in regions of sea-floor gas hydrate: Beaufort Sea continental slope. US Geological Survey Bulletin, USA, p.97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalili N, Khabbaz MH, 1998. A unique relationship for x for the determination of the shear strength of unsaturated soils. Geotechnique, 48(5):681–687. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.5.681

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HC, Bishnoi PR, Heidemann RA, et al., 1987. Kinetics of methane hydrate decomposition. Chemical Engineering Science, 42(7):1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(87)80169-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Moridis G, Yang D, et al., 2012. Numerical studies on two-way coupled fluid flow and geomechanics in hydrate deposits. SPE Journal, 17(2):485–501. https://doi.org/10.2118/141304-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimoto S, Oka F, Fushita T, et al., 2007. A chemo-thermomechanically coupled numerical simulation of the subsurface ground deformations due to methane hydrate dissociation. Computers and Geotechnics, 34(4):216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.02.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Klar A, Soga K, Ng MYA, 2010. Coupled deformation–flow analysis for methane hydrate extraction. Geotechnique, 60(10):765–776. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.079-3799

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalsky MB, Moridis GJ, 2007. Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models in simulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(6):1850–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YH, Liu WG, Song YC, et al., 2016a. Creep behaviors of methane hydrate coexisting with ice. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.042

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YH, Liu WG, Zhu YM, et al., 2016b. Mechanical behaviors of permafrost-associated methane hydrate-bearing sediments under different mining methods. Applied Energy, 162:1627–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.065

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda Y, Fujinaga Y, Naganawa S, et al., 1999. Modeling and experimental studies on dissociation of methane gas hydrates in Berea sandstone cores. Proceedings of the 3rd International Gas Hydrate Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui A, Haneda H, Ogata Y, et al., 2006. Triaxial compression test on submarine sediment containing methane hydrate in deep sea off the coast off Japan. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference, Japanese Geotechnical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui A, Haneda H, Ogata Y, et al., 2007. Compaction behavior of Toyoura sand during methane hydrate dissociation. Proceedings of the 7th ISOPE Ocean Mining Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver RD, 1982. Role of naturally occurring gas hydrates in sediment transport. AAPG Bulletin, 66(6):789–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minagawa H, Nishikawa Y, Ikeda I, et al., 2008. Characterization of sand sediment by pore size distribution and permeability using proton nuclear magnetic resonance measurement. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113(B7):B07210. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005403

    Google Scholar 

  • Moridis GJ, Collett TS, Dallimore SR, et al., 2004. Numerical studies of gas production from several CH4 hydrate zones at the Mallik site, Mackenzie Delta, Canada. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 43(3-4):219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.02.015

    Google Scholar 

  • Paull CK, Ussler W, Dallimore SR, et al., 2007. Origin of pingo-like features on the Beaufort Sea shelf and their possible relationship to decomposing methane gas hydrates. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(1):L01603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027977

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel C, 2011. Methane Hydrates and the Future of Natural Gas. MITEI Natural Gas Report, Supplementary Paper on Methane Hydrates, p.25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto Y, Komai T, Miyazaki K, et al., 2010. Laboratoryscale experiments of the methane hydrate dissociation process in a porous media and numerical study for the estimation of permeability in methane hydrate reservoir. Journal of Thermodynamics, 2010:452326. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/452326

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrefler BA, 1984. The Finite Element Method in Soil Consolidation. MS Thesis, University College of Swansea, Swansea, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song YC, Yu F, Li YH, et al., 2010. Mechanical property of artificial methane hydrate under triaxial compression. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 19(3):246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60073-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Song YC, Wang XJ, Yang MJ, et al., 2013. Study of selected factors affecting hydrate-based carbon dioxide separation from simulated fuel gas in porous media. Energy & Fuels, 27(6):3341–3348. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400257a

    Google Scholar 

  • Song YC, Cheng CX, Zhao JF, et al., 2015. Evaluation of gas production from methane hydrates using depressurization, thermal stimulation and combined methods. Applied Energy, 145:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.040

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Guo XX, Shao LT, et al., 2015. A thermodynamicsbased critical state constitutive model for methane hydrate bearing sediment. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27:1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.048

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DW, 1948. Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida S, 2013. Numerical Investigation of Geomechanical Behaviour of Hydrate-bearing Sediments. MS Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida S, Soga K, Yamamoto K, 2012. Critical state soil constitutive model for methane hydrate soil. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B3):B03209. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008661

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida S, Xie XG, Leung YF, 2016a. Role of critical state framework in understanding geomechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8):5580–5595. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012967

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida S, Deusner C, Klar A, et al., 2016b. Thermohydro-chemo-mechanical formulation for CH4-CO2 hydrate conversion based on hydrate formation and dissociation in hydrate-bearing sediments. Geo-Chicago 2016, p.235–244. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480137.024

    Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT, 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(5):892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder JW, Moridis GJ, Wilson SJ, et al., 2008. An international effort to compare gas hydrate reservoir simulators. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang MJ, Song YC, Jiang LL, et al., 2014. Hydrate-based technology for CO2 capture from fossil fuel power plants. Applied Energy, 116:26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.031

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JF, Yao L, Song YC, et al., 2011. In situ observations by magnetic resonance imaging for formation and dissociation of tetrahydrofuran hydrate in porous media. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29(2):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2010.08.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JF, Yu T, Song YC, et al., 2013. Numerical simulation of gas production from hydrate deposits using a single vertical well by depressurization in the Qilian Mountain permafrost, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Energy, 52:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.066

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JF, Liu D, Yang MJ, et al., 2014. Analysis of heat transfer effects on gas production from methane hydrate by depressurization. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 77:529–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.05.034

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JF, Zhu ZH, Song YC, et al., 2015. Analyzing the process of gas production for natural gas hydrate using depressurization. Applied Energy, 142:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.071

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Luo or Kenichi Soga.

Additional information

Project supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51436003), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFC0307305, 2016YFC0304001, and 2017YFC0307705), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51676024 and 51509032)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Luo, H. & Soga, K. A coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) model for methane hydrate bearing sediments using COMSOL Multiphysics. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19, 600–623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700464

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700464

Key words

CLC number

关键词

Navigation