Advertisement

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 56–68 | Cite as

Complete fuzzy scheduling and fuzzy earned value management in construction projects

  • José Luís Ponz-Tienda
  • Eugenio Pellicer
  • Víctor YepesEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper aims to present a comprehensive proposal for project scheduling and control by applying fuzzy earned value. It goes a step further than the existing literature: in the formulation of the fuzzy earned value we consider not only its duration, but also cost and production, and alternatives in the scheduling between the earliest and latest times. The mathematical model is implemented in a prototypical construction project with all the estimated values taken as fuzzy numbers. Our findings suggest that different possible schedules and the fuzzy arithmetic provide more objective results in uncertain environments than the traditional methodology. The proposed model allows for controlling the vagueness of the environment through the adjustment of the α-cut, adapting it to the specific circumstances of the project.

Key words

Construction Earned value method (EVM) Fuzzy logic Fuzzy set Project management Scheduling 

CLC

TU71 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anbari, F.T., 2003. Earned value project management: Methods and extensions. Project Management Journal, 34(4): 12–23.Google Scholar
  2. Bonnai, P., Gourc, D., Lacoste, G., 2004. Where do we stand with fuzzy project scheduling? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1):114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley, J.J., Eslami, E., Feuring, T., 2002. Fuzzy mathematics in Economics and Engineering: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chanas, S., Kambourowski, J., 1981. The use of fuzzy variables in PERT. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5(1):11–19. [doi:10.1016/0165-0114(81)90030-0]CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C.T., Huang, S.F., 2007. Applying fuzzy method for measuring criticality in project network. Information Sciences, 177:2448–2458. [doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.035]CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleming, Q.W., Koppelman, J.M., 1998. Earned value project management. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 16(1):19–23.Google Scholar
  7. Kuchta, D., 2005. Fuzzyfication of the earned value method. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 4(12):2222–2237.Google Scholar
  8. Laviolette, M., Seaman, J.W., Barrett, J.D., Woodall, W.H., 1995. A probabilistic and statistical view of fuzzy methods. Technometrics, 37(3):249–261.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawry, J., 2001. An alternative approach to computing with words. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 9:3–16. [doi:10.1142/S0218488501000958]CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipke, W., 2003. Schedule is Different. The Measurable News, March & Summer, p.31–34. Available from http://www.earnedschedule.com/Docs/Schedule%20is%20Different.pdf [Accessed on May 20, 2011].
  11. Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., Anbari, F.T., 2009. Prediction of project outcome: The application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4):400–407. [doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.009]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, Y.C., Yang, S.M., Lin, Y.T., 2010. Fuzzy finish time modeling for project scheduling. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 12(11):946–952. [doi:10.1631/jzus.A10001115]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moslemi, N.L., Salehipour, A., 2011. Evaluating fuzzy earned value indices and estimates by applying alpha cuts. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7):8193–8198. [doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.165]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moslemi, N.L., Shadrokh, S., Salehipour, A., 2011. A fuzzy approach for the earned value management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6):764–772. [doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.012]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Noori, S., Bagherpour, M., Zareei, A., 2008. Applying fuzzy control charts in earned value analysis: A new application. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(4):684–690.Google Scholar
  16. Pellicer, E., Pellicer, T.M., Catalá, J., 2009. An integrated control system for SMEs in the construction industry. Revista de la Construcción, 8(2):4–17.Google Scholar
  17. Ponz-Tienda, J.L., 2010. Robust GRCPSP based on Production Processes for Construction Projects. PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  18. Prade, H., 1979. Using fuzzy set theory in a scheduling problem: A case study. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2(2):153–165. [doi:10.1016/0165-0114(79)90022-8]CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Shipley, M., Korvin, A., Omer, K., 1996. A fuzzy logic approach for determining expected values: A project management application. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(4):562–569.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, J., Hao, J., 2007. Fuzzy linguistic PERT. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(2):133–144. [doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879975]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yao, J.S., Wu, K.M., 2000. Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116(2):275–288. [doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00122-5]CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3):338–353. [doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X]CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Zadeh, L.A., 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part I. Information Sciences, 8(3):199–249. [doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5]CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Zadeh, L.A., 1995. Discussion: Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics, 37(3):271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luís Ponz-Tienda
    • 1
  • Eugenio Pellicer
    • 2
  • Víctor Yepes
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Building EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Construction Engineering, ICITECHUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations