Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of tunneling effects on existing buildings. The direct solution, using the condensation method, is presented. This method allows the structural and geotechnical engineers to treat the problem separately and then assemble a relatively small matrix that can be solved directly, even within a spreadsheet. There are certain concerns that the resultant matrix may be ill-conditioned when the structure is very stiff. This paper suggests an alternative method that essentially relaxes the system from an infinitely rigid structure solution. As such, it does not encounter the problems associated with stiff systems. The two methods are evaluated for an example problem of tunneling below a framed structure. It is found that while the direct method may fail to predict reasonable values when the structure is extremely rigid, the alternative method is stable. The relaxation method can therefore be used in cases where there are concerns about the reliability of a direct solution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attewell, P.B., Yeates, J., Selby, A.R., 1986. Soil Movements Induced by Tunnelling and Their Effects on Pipelines and Structures. Blackie and Son Ltd., London.
Davis, R.O., Selvadurai, A.P.S., 1996. Elasticity and Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Franzius, J.N., Potts, D.M., Burland, J.B., 2006. The response of surface structures to tunnel construction. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 159(1):3–17.
Itasca, 2005. FLAC Ver. 5-User Manual. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis.
Klar, A., Vorster, T.E.B., Soga, K., Mair, R.J., 2005. Soil-pipe interaction due to tunneling: comparison between winkler and elastic continuum solutions. Geotechnique, 55(6): 461–466. [doi:10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.461]
Klar, A., Vorster, T.E.B., Soga, K., Mair, R.J., 2007. Elastoplastic solution for soil-pipe-tunnel interaction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(7): 782–792. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7 (782)]
Klar, A., Marshall, A.M., Soga, K., Mair, R.J., 2008. Tunnelling effects on jointed pipeline. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(1):131–139. [doi:10.1139/T07-068]
LUSAS, 2007. LUSAS Ver. 14-User Manual. LUSAS, London.
Mair, R.J., Taylor, R.N., Bracegirdle, A., 1993. Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays. Geotechnique, 43(2):315–320. [doi:10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315]
Oasys, 2007. Oasys-GSA Ver 8.2-User Manual. Oasys Limited, London.
Plaxis, 2006. Plaxis ver 8.0-User Manual. Plaxis, Delft.
Potts, D.M., Addenbrooke, T.I., 1997. A structure’s influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 125(2):109–125.
Poulos, H.G., Davis, E.H., 1974. Elastic Solutions for Soil and Rock Mechanics. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Weaver, W., Johnston, P.R., 1987. Structural Dynamics by Finite Elements. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the Israel Ministry of Housing and Construction, through the National Building Research Institute at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klar, A., Elkayam, I. Direct and relaxation methods for soil-structure interaction due to tunneling. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 11, 9–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900069
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900069