Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to find optimum locations and capacity of flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices in a power system using a multi-objective optimization function. Thyristor controlled series compensators (TCSCs) and static var compensators (SVCs) are the utilized FACTS devices. Our objectives are active power loss reduction, newly introduced FACTS devices cost reduction, voltage deviation reduction, and increase on the robustness of the security margin against voltage collapse. The operational and controlling constraints, as well as load constraints, were considered in the optimum allocation. A goal attainment method based on the genetic algorithm (GA) was used to approach the global optimum. The estimated annual load profile was utilized in a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) optimization sub-problem to the optimum siting and sizing of FACTS devices. Fars Regional Electric Network was selected as a practical system to validate the performance and effectiveness of the proposed method. The entire investment of the FACTS devices was paid off and an additional 2.4% savings was made. The cost reduction of peak point power generation implies that power plant expansion can be postponed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari, A., Hosseini, H., Yousefi, G.H., Seifi, H., 2005. Comprehensive Studies of FREC Transmission and Subtransmission Network in Years of 2010–2013. Technical Report TR-01 (483041-2468). Iranian Power System Research (IPSERC), Tehran, Iran.
Ambriz-Perez, H., Acha, E., Fuerte-Esquivel, C.R., 2000. Advanced SVC model for Newton-Raphson load flow and Newton optimal power flow studies. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 15(1):129–136. [doi:10.1109/59.852111]
Cai, L.J., Erlich, I., Stamtsis, G., 2004. Optimal Choice and Allocation of FACTS Devices in Deregulated Electricity Market Using Genetic Algorithms. IEEE-PES Power Systems Conf. and Exposition, 1:201–207.
Chang, C.S., Huang, J.S., 1998. Optimal multi-objective SVC planning for voltage stability enhancement. IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib., 145(2):203–209. [doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:19981697]
Chen, Y.L., Liu, C.C., 1994. Multi-objective VAR planning using the goal-attainment method. IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib., 141(3):227–232. [doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:19949941]
Gembicki, F.W., Haimes, Y.Y., 1975. Approach to performance and sensitivity multi-objective optimization: the goalattainment method. IEEE. Trans. Automatic Control, 20(6):769–771. [doi:10.1109/TAC.1975.1101105]
Gerbex, S., Cherkaoui, R., Germond, A.J., 2001. Optimal location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 16(3):537–544. [doi:10.1109/59.932292]
Gill, P.E., Murray, W., Wright, M., 1981. Practical Optimization. Academic Press, USA.
Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, USA.
Jurado, F., Rodriguez, J.A., 1999. Optimal Location of SVC Based on Systems Loadability and Contingency Analysis. Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, p.1193–1199.
Lu, Y., Abur, A., 2002. Static security enhancement via optimal utilization of thyristor controlled series capacitors. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 17(2):324–329. [doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007899]
Obadina, O.O., Berg, G.J., 1988. Determination of voltage stability limit in multi-machine power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 3(4):1545–1554. [doi:10.1109/59.192964]
Okamoto, H., Kurita, A., Sekine, Y., 1995. A method for identification of effective locations of variable impedance apparatus on enhancement of steady-state stability in large-scale power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 10(3):1401–1407. [doi:10.1109/59.466512]
Ongsakul, W., Bhasaputra, P., 2002. Optimal power flow with FACTS devices by hybrid TS/SA approach. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 24(10):851–857. [doi:10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00006-6]
Padhy, N.P., Abdel Moamen, M.A., 2005. Power flow control and solutions with multiple and multi-type FACTS devices. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 74(3):341–351. [doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2004.10.010]
Radu, D., Bésanger, Y., 2006. A Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm Approach to Optimal Allocation of Multi-type FACTS Devices for Power Systems Security. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, p.18–22.
Sharma, N.K., Ghosh, A., Varma, R.K., 2003. A novel placement strategy for FACTS controllers. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 18(3):982–987. [doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2003.813874]
Singh, S.N., David, A.K., 2000. Congestion Management by Optimising FACTS Device Location. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, p.23–28. [doi:10.1109/DRPT.2000.855633]
Song, S.H., 2004. Installation and operation of FACTS devices for enhancing steady-state security. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 70(1):7–15. [doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2003.11.009]
Yorino, N., El-Araby, E.E., Sasaki, H., Harada, S., 2003. A new formulation for FACTS allocation for security enhancement against voltage collapse. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 18(1):3–10. [doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2002.804921]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gitizadeh, M., Kalantar, M. Optimum allocation of FACTS devices in Fars Regional Electric Network using genetic algorithm based goal attainment. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 10, 478–487 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0820130
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0820130
Key words
- Flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices allocation
- Multi-objective optimization
- Genetic algorithm (GA)
- Goal attainment