Skip to main content
Log in

On the fracture resistance of adhesively jointing structures

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interface toughness of adhesively bonded structural members is one of the critical parameters for adhesive joint design. It is often assumed that the joint toughness is a material constant so that its value can be obtained from fracture tests of simple geometries such as DCB for Mode-I, ENF for Mode-II, using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). However, the LEFM assumption of point-wise crack-tip fracture process is overly simplistic and may cause significant error in interpreting fracture test data. In this paper, the accuracy and applicability of various traditional beam-bending-theory based methods for fracture toughness evaluation, such as simple beam theory (SBT), corrected beam theory (CBT) and experimental compliance method (ECM), were assessed using the cohesive zone modelling (CZM) approach. It was demonstrated that the fracture process zone (FPZ) size has profound influence on toughness calculation and unfortunately, all the classic beam-bending theories based methods fail to include this important element and are erroneous especially when the ratio of crack length to FPZ size is relatively small (<5.0). It has also been demonstrated that after the FPZ size is incorporated into simple beam formulations, they provide much improved evaluation for fracture toughness. Formulation of first order estimate of FPZ size is also given in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackman, B.R.K., Kinloch, A.J., Paraschi, M., Teo, W.S., 2003. Measuring the Mode I adhesive fracture energy, G IC, of structural adhesive joints: the results of an international round-robin. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 23(4):293–305. [doi:10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00047-2]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, B.R.K., Kinloch, A.J., Paraschi, M., 2005. The determination of the Mode II adhesive fracture resistance, G IIC, of structural adhesive joints: an effective crack length approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 72(6):877–897. [doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.08.007]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J.W., Suo, Z., 1992. Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 29:63–191.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen, M.F., 1973. An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest. International Journal of Fracture, 9(1):83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinloch, A.J., Lau, C.C., Williams, G.J., 1994. The peeling of flexible laminates. International Journal of Fracture, 94:79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, A., 1987. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 54:525–531.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, A., 1997. Numerical modeling of crack growth under dynamic loading conditions. Computation Mechanics, 19(6):463–469. [doi:10.1007/s004660050194]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tvergaard, V., Hutchinson, J.W., 1992. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 40(6):1377–1397. [doi:10.1016/00225096(92)90020-3]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tvergaard, V., Hutchinson, J.W., 1993. The influence of plasticity on the mixed mode interface toughness. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 41(6):1119–1135. [doi:10.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G., 1989. End corrections for orthotropic DCB specimens. Composite Science and Technology, 35(4):367–376. [doi:10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q.D., Thouless, M.D., 2001. Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. International Journal of Fracture, 110(2):175–187. [doi:10.1023/A:1010869706996]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q.D., Cox, B.N., 2005. Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites. International Journal of Fracture, 133(2):107–137. [doi:10.1007/s10704-005-4729-6]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q.D., Thouless, M.D., Ward, S.M., 1999. Numerical simulation of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 47(6):1337–1353. [doi:10.1016/S00225096(98)00101-X]

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q.D., Thouless, M.D., Ward, S.M., 2000. Analysis of the 90°-peel test with extensive plastic deformation. Journal of Adehesion, 72:115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q.D., Cox, B.N., Nalla, R.K., Ritchie, R.O., 2006. Fracture length scales in human cortical bone: the necessity of nonlinear fracture models. Biomaterials, 27(9):2095–2113. [doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.040]

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Wei-qiu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10272088), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, Zq., Yang, Qd. & Chen, Wq. On the fracture resistance of adhesively jointing structures. J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. A 7, 1289–1295 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A1289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A1289

Key words

CLC number

Navigation