Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of light and temperature conditions on flowering in Mat Rush

  • Biotechnology & Life Science
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of photoperiod and light intensity on flowering in Mat Rush cv. Gangshan 3 were studied. The results showed that treatments with longer day length stimulated flowering significantly and increased stem flowering percentage (SFP). Plants treated with low light intensity at early stage had substantially reduced florets per cyme, SFP, tillers per plant and stem length. At middle and late stage, low light intensity significantly reduced SFP. The principal climatic factors affecting SFP were as follows: mean temperatures (MT) of the third ten-day period (TDP) in December and of the second TDP in February, actual sunlight hours (SH) of the third TDP in February and precipitation of the third TDP in March. A nonlinear simulation model for SFP was established with experimental results and corresponding climatic data (see Eq. (2)).

Simulation by the above equation yielded values the same as those observed from 1992 to 2000, indicating its accuracy in describing the relationship between flowering and light and temperature conditions. The interaction between vernalization and SH is also discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, M., Jarillo, J. A., Smirnova, O., Cashmore, A. R., 1998. The CRY1 blue light photoreceptor of Arabidopsis interacts with phytochrome A in vitro.Molecule Cell.,1:939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araki, T., 2001. Transition from vegetative to reproductive phase.Curr Opin Plant Biol.,4(1):63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battey, N. H., Lyndon, R. F., 1990. Reversion of flowering.Botany Review.,56(2):162–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battey, N. H., 2000. Aspects of seasonality.J Exp Bot.,51(352):1769–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, B. A. M., Vankeulen, H., 1996. The school of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: A pedigree and historical overview.Agriculture System,52(2–3):171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. N., Li, W. A., 1993. De novo flower differentiation in tissue culture of marigold, violet orychophragmus and tobacco.China Science Bulletin,38(3):235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankhauser, C., Chory, J., 1999. Light receptor kinases in plants.Current Biology,9:R123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. F., Meng, F. J., 1997. Floral determination of plants.Plant physiology Communications,33(2):81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinet, J. M., 1977. Effect of light condition on the development of the inflorescence in tomato.Scientia Horticulturae,6:15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A., 1965. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Ruhland, W. Berlin (ed.), Springer, p. 1489–1536.

  • Levy, Y. Y., Dean, C., 1998. The transition to flowering.Plant Cell, (10):1973–1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Chengtao, 2000. Photoreceptors and regulation of flowering time.Plant physiology,123:39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, R. F., 1998. Reversion of flowering.In: R. F. Lyndon ed., The Shoot Apical Meristem: Its Crowth and Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C. N., Singer, S. R., and Smith, S. M. E., 1992. Developmental states associated with the floral transition.Dev. Biol.,153:59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, G. S., Wilheim, W. W., Morgan, J. A., 1992. Simulating winter wheat shoot apex phenology.Journal of Agricultural Science,119:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruo, W. X., Yu, G. H., Li, F. L., 1991. Some photosynthetic characteristics of American Ginseng under different light intensity.Plant physiology Communications,1:35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W. Q., Zhang, G. P., Gui, W. G., 2002. Effect of light on the growth and stem flowering rate of Mat Rush.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,13(5):577–580 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tookea, F., Battey, N. H., 2000, A Leaf-derived signal Is a quantitative determinant of floral form in impatients.Plant Cell,12:1837–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince-Prue, D., 1975. Vernalization.In: Photoperiodism in Plants, London, McGraw Hill, p. 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. F., Chen, J. X., 1987. The Effect of light intensity on plant development and yield of rape.Journal of Human College,35(Supplement):29–35 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X. Y., Qi, C. H., Xie, H. A., 1989. A model bank on the technical decision of crop production,In: Pro. of International Conference on Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing, p. 887–891.

  • Yin, X. Y., Qi, C. H., 1994. Studies on the rice growth calendar simulation model (RICAM) and its application.Acta Agronomica Sinica,20(3):339–346.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S. M., 1982. Study on morphological and biological character of common rush.Acta Agriculture Universitatis Zhejianensis,8(2):131–142 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shen Wei-qi.

Additional information

Project (No. 981105) supported by the Ningbo City Science Foundation, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wei-qi, S., Guo-ping, Z., Li-feng, X. et al. Effects of light and temperature conditions on flowering in Mat Rush. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 3, 611–616 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2002.0611

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2002.0611

Key words

CLC number

Navigation