Quantum security analysis of a lattice-based oblivious transfer protocol
- 53 Downloads
Because of the concise functionality of oblivious transfer (OT) protocols, they have been widely used as building blocks in secure multiparty computation and high-level protocols. The security of OT protocols built upon classical number theoretic problems, such as the discrete logarithm and factoring, however, is threatened as a result of the huge progress in quantum computing. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography is needed for protocols based on classical problems, and several proposals for post-quantum OT protocols exist. However, most post-quantum cryptosystems present their security proof only in the context of classical adversaries, not in the quantum setting. In this paper, we close this gap and prove the security of the lattice-based OT protocol proposed by Peikert et al. (CRYPTO, 2008), which is universally composably secure under the assumption of learning with errors hardness, in the quantum setting. We apply three general quantum security analysis frameworks. First, we apply the quantum lifting theorem proposed by Unruh (EUROCRYPT, 2010) to prove that the security of the lattice-based OT protocol can be lifted into the quantum world. Then, we apply two more security analysis frameworks specified for post-quantum cryptographic primitives, i.e., simple hybrid arguments (CRYPTO, 2011) and game-preserving reduction (PQCrypto, 2014).
Key wordsOblivious transfer Post-quantum Lattice-based Learning with errors Universally composable
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canetti, R., 2001. Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols. Proc. 42nd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, p.136–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2001.959888Google Scholar
- Gentry, C., Peikert, C., Vaikuntanathan, V., 2008. Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. Proc. 40th Annual ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, p.197–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1374376.1374407Google Scholar
- Micciancio, D., Regev, O., 2009. Lattice-based cryptography. In: Bernstein, D.J., Buchmann, J., Dahmen, E. (Eds.), Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer, Berlin, p.147–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7_5Google Scholar
- Rabin, M.O., 1981. How to Exchange Secrets with Oblivious Transfer. Technical Report No. TR-81, Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/187Google Scholar
- Regev, O., 2005. On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. Proc. 37th Annual ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, p.84–93. https://doi.org/10.1145/1060590.1060603Google Scholar
- Sendrier, N., 2011. Code-based cryptography. In: van Tilborg, H.C.A., Jajodia, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security. Springer, New York, p.215–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5_378Google Scholar
- Zhandry, M., 2012. How to construct quantum random functions. IEEE 53rd Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, p.679–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2012.37Google Scholar