Skip to main content
Log in

Improved genetic operator for genetic algorithm

  • Indutrial Control Technology
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mutation operator has been seldom improved because researchers hardly suspect its ability to prevent genetic algorithm (GA) from converging prematurely. Due to its importance to GA, the authors of this paper study its influence on the diversity of genes in the same locus, and point out that traditional mutation, to some extent, can result in premature convergence of genes (PCG) in the same locus. The above drawback of the traditional mutation operator causes the loss of critical alleles. Inspired by digital technique, we introduce two kinds of boolean operation into GA to develop a novel mutation operator and discuss its contribution to preventing the loss of critical alleles. The experimental results of function optimization show that the improved mutation operator can effectively prevent premature convergence, and can provide a wide selection range of control parameters for GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Back, T., Hoffmeister, F., 1991. Extended selection mechanisms in genetic algorithms, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, Univ of California, San Diego, CA, p. 14–21.

  • Eshelman, L. J., Shaffer, J. D., 1991. Preventing premature convergence in Genetic algorithms by preventing incest, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, p. 115–122.

  • Grefenstette, J. J., 1986. Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms,IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybren.,16(1):122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grefenstette, J. J., Gopal, R. R., and Van Gucht, D., 1985. Genetic Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problem, Proc. Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, p. 160–168.

  • Holland, J. H., 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Feng, 2001. New sensorless speed vector control of induction motor drive system.Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science),35(1):67–71 (in Chinese, with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. A., Potter, W. D., Gandham R. V., 1993. An evaluation of local improvement operators for genetic algorithms.IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.,23 (5):1340–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, J. C., Giddens, T. D. and Yadev, S. B., 1994. The Development and evaluation of an improved genetic algorithm based on migration and artificial selection.IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.,24(1):73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, L., Qi-wen, Y. Improved genetic operator for genetic algorithm. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. 3, 431–434 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1631/BF02839485

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/BF02839485

Key words

Document code

CLC number

Navigation