Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients
Background and objective
Stroke volume variation (SVV) has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, sinus rhythm (SR) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CV) are mandatory for their application. Several studies suggest a limited applicability of SVV in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that the applicability of SVV might be different over time and within certain subgroups of ICU patients. Therefore, we analysed the prevalence of SR and CV in ICU patients during the first 24 h of PiCCO-monitoring (primary endpoint) and during the total ICU stay. We also investigated the applicability of SVV in the subgroups of patients with sepsis, cirrhosis, and acute pancreatitis.
The prevalence of SR and CV was documented immediately before 1241 thermodilution measurements in 88 patients. Results: In all measurements, SVV was applicable in about 24%. However, the applicability of SVV was time-dependent: the prevalence of both SR and CV was higher during the first 24 h compared to measurements thereafter (36.1% vs. 21.9%; P<0.001). Within different subgroups, the applicability during the first 24 h of monitoring ranged between 0% in acute pancreatitis, 25.5% in liver failure, and 48.9% in patients without pancreatitis, liver failure, pneumonia or sepsis.
The applicability of SVV in a predominantly medical ICU is only about 25%–35%. The prevalence of both mandatory criteria decreases over time during the ICU stay. Furthermore, the applicability is particularly low in patients with acute pancreatitis and liver failure.
Key wordsHemodynamic monitoring Preload Fluid responsiveness Stroke volume variation Pulse pressure variation
通过对危重病人在入院后24 小时内和整个重症 监护过程中窦性心律和控制呼吸情况的调查,分 析每搏量变异在评估危重病人容量反应的适用 性,并探究每搏量变异度在败血症、肝硬化和胰 腺炎病人中的适用性。
通过探究窦性节律和控制呼吸情况评估每搏量变 异度在重症监护病人临床上的适用性,弥补重症 监护病人窦性节律和控制呼吸情况数据的空白。
在进行1241 次热稀释法血流量测量前,对88 位 病人的窦性节律和控制呼吸情况进行调查。
每搏量变异度在主要的医疗重症监护病房中的适 用性只约为25%~35%。两项强制性指标的流行 性在重症监护病房的情况随时间的延长而降低。 此外,每搏量变异度在胰腺炎和肝功能衰竭患者 中的适用性尤其低。
关键词前负荷 容量反应性 每搏量变异度 脉压变异
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Benes J, Zatloukal J, Kletecka J, et al., 2014b. Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states. J Clin Monit Comput, 28(3):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9524-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al., 2014. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care, 18(6):587. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, et al., 2007. Increased intraabdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med, 33(1):163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0412-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goepfert MS, Richter HP, zu Eulenburg C, et al., 2013. Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 119(4):824–836. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829bd770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofkens PJ, Verrijcken A, Merveille K, et al., 2015. Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 47(2):89–116. https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.a2014.0068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huber W, Umgelter A, Reindl W, et al., 2008. Volume assessment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: a comparison of intrathoracic blood volume index, central venous pressure, and hematocrit, and their correlation to cardiac index and extravascular lung water index. Crit Care Med, 36(8):2348–2354. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181809928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huber W, Phillip V, Höllthaler J, et al., 2016a. Femoral indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution using the EV1000/VolumeView®: do the same criteria apply as for the PiCCO®? J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 17(7):561–567. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1500244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huber W, Fuchs S, Minning A, et al., 2016b. Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) before, during and after sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED). A prospective study on feasibility of TPTD and prediction of successful fluid removal. PLoS ONE, 11(4):e0153430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153430CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A, et al., 2012. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med, 40(1): 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perel A, 1998. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology, 89(6):1309–1310. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199812000-00005PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al., 2005. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth, 95(6):746–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, et al., 2009. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med, 37(2):650–658. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181959864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakka SG, 2015. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill patient—current status and perspective. Front Med (Lausanne), 2:44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00044Google Scholar
- Umgelter A, Reindl W, Wagner KS, et al., 2008. Effects of plasma expansion with albumin and paracentesis on haemodynamics and kidney function in critically ill cirrhotic patients with tense ascites and hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective uncontrolled trial. Crit Care, 12(1): R4. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6765CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar