Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A

, Volume 11, Issue 11, pp 908–920 | Cite as

Numerical analysis of pipeline in J-lay problem

Article

Abstract

The pipe configuration and internal loads along the pipeline during the pipeline laying process have long been the focus of engineers. Most researchers simplify the seabed to be rigid and the water to be calm, ignoring the pipe embedment into the seabed and the influence of ocean currents. In this paper, a novel numerical approach is proposed for the laying of pipelines in the so-called J-lay method, taking into account the importance of both pipe embedment and ocean currents. The pipeline is divided into two parts, one part suspended in water, and the other laid on the seabed. The continuity of the two parts at the touch down point (TDP) is guaranteed to make a whole. The feasibility of the model is proved by the comparison between the present model and an analytical model, which shows good agreement in both pipeline configuration and bending moment distribution. Finally, parametric study was performed to consider the influence of current velocity, water depth, top inclination angle, and seabed stiffness, and conclusions are drawn.

Key words

Pipeline J-lay method Numerical model Seabed stiffness Current velocity 

CLC number

TE3 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubeny, C.P., Dunlap, W.A., 2003. Penetration of Cylindrical Objects in Soft Mud. Proc. IEEE Oceans, San Diego, CA, USA, p.2068–2073.Google Scholar
  2. Aubeny, C.P., Shi, H., Murff, J.D., 2005. Collapse loads for a cylinder embedded in trench in cohesive soil. International Journal of Geomechanics, 5(4):320–325. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(320)]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubeny, C.P., Biscontin, G., Zhang, J., 2006. Seafloor Interaction with Steel Catenary Risers. Final Project Report, Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Berteaux, H.O., 1976. Buoy Engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Brando, P., Sebastiani, G., 1971. Determination of Sealines Elastic Curves and Stresses to be Expected during Operation. Third Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, OTC 1354.Google Scholar
  6. Bridge, C., Laver, K., Clukey, E., Evans, T., 2004. Steel Catenary Riser Touchdown Point Vertical Interaction Models. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, OTC 16628, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, J.J., 1994. The Deployment of an Undersea Cable System in Sheared Current. Proceedings of BOSS, 2:327–334.Google Scholar
  8. Casarella, M.J., Parsons, M., 1970. Cable systems under hydrodynamic loading. Marine Technology Society Journal, 4(4):27–44.Google Scholar
  9. Cheuk, C.Y., White, D.J., Dingle, H.R.C., 2008. Upper bound plasticity analysis of a partially-embedded pipe under combined vertical and horizontal loading. Soils and Foundations, 48(1):133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon, D.A., Rultledge, D.R., 1968. Stiffened catenary calculation in pipeline laying problem. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 90B(1):153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guarracino, F., Mallardo, V., 1999. A refined analytical analysis of submerged pipelines in seabed laying. Applied Ocean Research, 21(6):281–293. [doi:10.1016/S0141-1187(99)00020-6]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langner, C.G., 1984. Relationships for Deepwater Suspended Pipe Spans. Proc. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana, p.552–558.Google Scholar
  13. Lenci, S., Callegari, M., 2005. Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem. Acta Mechanica, 178(1–2):23–39. [doi:10.1007/s00707-005-0239-x]CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, Z.G., Wang, C., He, N., Zhao, D.Y., 2008. An overview of deepwater pipeline laying technology. China Ocean Engineering, 22(3):521–532.Google Scholar
  15. Liang, Z.T., 2008. Analysis on Mechanical Performance for Deep-water Pipe-laying. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Merifield, R.S., White, D.J., Randolph, M.F., 2008. The ultimate undrained resistance of partially embedded pipelines. Géotechnique, 58(6):461–470. [doi:10.1680/geot.2007.00097]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merifield, R.S., White, D.J., Randolph, M.F., 2009. Effect of surface heave on response of partially embedded pipelines on clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(6):819–829. [doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000070]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morison, J.R., O’Brien, M.P., Johnson, J.W., Schaaf, S.A., 1950. The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles. Petroleum Transactions, AIME, 189:149–154.Google Scholar
  19. Murff, J.D., Wanger, D.A., Randolph, M.F., 1989. Pipe penetration in cohesive soil. Géotechnique, 39(2):213–229. [doi:10.1680/geot.1989.39.2.213]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palmer, A.C., Hutchinson, G., Ells, W.J., 1974. Configuration of submarine pipelines during laying operations. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 96(4):1112–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perinet, D., Frazer, I., 2007. J-lay and Steep S-lay: Complementary Tools for Ultra Deep Water. Houston, Texas, OTC 18669.Google Scholar
  22. Plunkett, R., 1967. Static bending stresses in catenaries and drill strings. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 39B(1):31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Powers, J.T., Finn, L.D., 1969. Stress Analysis of Offshore Pipelines during Installation. First Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, OTC 1071.Google Scholar
  24. Pulici, M., Trifon, M., Dumitrescu, A., 2003. Deep Water Sealines Installation by Using J-lay Method—The Blue Stream Project. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Haiwaii, p.38–43.Google Scholar
  25. Vaz, M.A., Paten, M.H., 2000. Three-dimensional behavior of elastic marine cables in sheared currents. Applied Ocean Research, 22(1):45–53. [doi:10.1016/S0141-1187(99)00023-1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wasow, W., 1956. Singular perturbations of boundary value problems for nonlinear differential equations of second order. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 9(1):93–113. [doi:10.1002/cpa.3160090107]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, B.W., 1960. Characteristics of Anchor Cables in Uniform Ocean Currents. Technical Report No. 204-1, Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Zhou, J., 2008. Investigation on Configuration and Construction Technics of S-lay for Deepwater Submarine Pipelines. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-zhong Wang
    • 1
  • Feng Yuan
    • 1
  • Zhen Guo
    • 1
  • Ling-ling Li
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations