Disturbance rejection via iterative learning control with a disturbance observer for active magnetic bearing systems
Although standard iterative learning control (ILC) approaches can achieve perfect tracking for active magnetic bearing (AMB) systems under external disturbances, the disturbances are required to be iteration-invariant. In contrast to existing approaches, we address the tracking control problem of AMB systems under iteration-variant disturbances that are in different channels from the control inputs. A disturbance observer based ILC scheme is proposed that consists of a universal extended state observer (ESO) and a classical ILC law. Using only output feedback, the proposed control approach estimates and attenuates the disturbances in every iteration. The convergence of the closed-loop system is guaranteed by analyzing the contraction behavior of the tracking error. Simulation and comparison studies demonstrate the superior tracking performance of the proposed control approach.
Key wordsActive magnetic bearings (AMBs) Iterative learning control (ILC) Disturbance observer
CLC numberTP27 TH133
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arimoto S, Kawamura S, Miyazaki F, 1984. Bettering operation of robots by learning. J Field Robot, 1(2):123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.4620010203Google Scholar
- Baßler S, Dünow P, Marquardt M, et al., 2015. Application of iterative learning control methods for a service robot with multi-body kinematics. 20th Int Conf on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, p.465–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2015.7283920Google Scholar
- Bleuler H, Cole M, Keogh P, et al., 2009. Magnetic Bearings: Theory, Design, and Application to Rotating Machinery. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Bolder J, Lemmen B, Koekebakker S, et al., 2012. Iterative learning control with basis functions for media positioning in scanning inkjet printers. IEEE Int Symp on Intelligent Control, p.1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.2012.6398276Google Scholar
- Kucera L, 1997. Robustness of self-sensing magnetic bearing. Proc Industrial Conf and Exhibition on Magnetic Bearings, p.261–270.Google Scholar
- Mandra S, Galkowski K, Aschemann H, et al., 2015. Guaranteed cost iterative learning control—an application to control of permanent magnet synchronous motors. IEEE 9th Int Workshop on Multidimensional (nD) Systems, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/NDS.2015.7332639Google Scholar
- Sun JK, Li SH, Yang J, 2014. Iterative learning control with extended state observer for iteration-varying disturbance rejection. Proc 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, p.1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCICA.2014.7052880Google Scholar
- Yang J, Zheng WX, 2014. Offset-free nonlinear MPC for mismatched disturbance attenuation with application to a static var compensator. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II, 61(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2013.2290912Google Scholar