Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of clay type and component fineness on the hydration and properties of limestone calcined clay cement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) is emerging as an alternative to Portland cement, offering economic advantages, reduced CO2 emissions, and mechanical properties on par with Portland cement. Central to the effective utilization of LC3 is understanding how the fineness of its components affects its performance. The current study investigates limestone calcined clay cement mixtures composed of kaolinite, illite, and montmorillonite calcined clays and limestone at two levels of fineness. Strengths of mortar cubes were tested at 1, 3, 7, and 28 d and statistical analysis was performed with a 95% confidence level. Additionally, LC3 pastes were analyzed using x-ray diffraction, mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and isothermal calorimetry. The fineness of the calcined clay along with the fineness of limestone is found to be statistically significant for 28-d strength in LC3 mortars made with kaolinitic and montmorillonite calcined clays. All hydrated blends had a hemicarboaluminate phase, whose intensity was related to the fineness of the calcined clay, and the monocarboaluminate phase formation was found to be dependent on both the fineness and type of calcined clay. Porosimetry revealed that LC3 pastes with illite clay have larger threshold pore diameters than those with kaolinite clay. LC3 pastes containing kaolinite have denser microstructures due to C–S–H and hemicarboaluminate formation. Pastes produced with coarse calcined clay and coarse limestone led to a broader, weaker heat development peak and lower normalized cumulative heat. LC3 with kaolinitic clay has the highest normalized cumulative heat, while that with montmorillonite calcined clay has the lowest.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maddalena R, Roberts JJ, Hamilton A (2018) Can Portland cement be replaced by low-carbon alternative materials? A study on the thermal properties and carbon emissions of innovative cements. J Clean Prod 186:933–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huntzinger DN, Eatmon TD (2009) A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. J Clean Prod 17(7):668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gawah Q, Al-Osta MA, Maslehuddin M, Abdullah MA, Shameem M, Al-Dulaijan SU (2023) Development of sustainable self-compacting concrete utilising silico manganese fume. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 27(5):1897–1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2022.2102083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erdem TK, Meral Ç, Tokyay M, Erdoğan TY (2007) Use of perlite as a pozzolanic addition in producing blended cements. Cem Concr Compos 29(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knight KA, Cunningham PR, Miller SA (2023) Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 139:105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Malhotra VM, Hammings RT (1995) Blended cements in North America-a review. Cem Concr Compos 17(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)95757-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamdadou MN, Bignonnet F, Deboucha W, Ranaivomanana H, Leklou N, Arroudj K (2023) Hydration, mechanical and transfer properties of blended cement pastes and mortars prepared with recycled powder or limestone filler. J Build Eng 78:107541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yong CL, Mo KH, Koting S, Ling TC (2024) Effect of various additives in activating early age properties of phosphorus furnace slag blended cement. J Build Eng 82:108136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scrivener K, Martirena F, Bishnoi S, Maity S (2018) Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem Concr Res 114:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaudhury R, Sharma U, Thapliyal PC, Singh LP (2023) Low-CO2 emission strategies to achieve net zero target in cement sector. J Clean Prod 417:137466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulze SE, Rickert J (2019) Suitability of natural calcined clays as supplementary cementitious material. Cem Concr Compos 95:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Avet F, Li X, Scrivener K (2018) Determination of the amount of reacted metakaolin in calcined clay blends. Cem Concr Res 106:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma M, Bishnoi S, Martirena F, Scrivener K (2021) Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: a state-of-the-art review. Cem Concr Res 149:106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández R, Martirena F, Scrivener K (2011) The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: a comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cem Concr Res 41(1):113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vizcaíno Andrés LM, Antoni MG, Alujas Diaz A, Martirena Hernández JF, Scrivener K (2015) Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-limestone cements. Adv Cem Res 27(9):546–556. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.14.00095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Borno IB, Ashraf W (2023) Effects of co-calcining kaolinite-rich clay blends with alkali and alkali earth metal hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci 231:106742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zunino F, Scrivener K (2024) Reactivity of kaolinitic clays calcined in the 650 °C–1050 °C temperature range: towards a robust assessment of overcalcination. Cem Concr Res 146:105380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alujas A, Fernández R, Quintana R, Scrivener K, Martirena F (2015) Pozzolanic reactivity of low grade kaolinitic clays: influence of calcination temperature and impact of calcination products on OPC hydration. Appl Clay Sci 108:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonavetti VL, Castellano CC, Irassar EF (2022) Designing general use cement with calcined illite and limestone filler. Appl Clay Sci 230:106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou Y, Wang Z, Zhu Z, Chen Y, Wu K, Huang H, Anvarovna KG, Xu L (2022) Influence of metakaolin and calcined montmorillonite on the hydration of calcium sulphoaluminate cement. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e01104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mañosa J, Alvarez-Coscojuela A, Marco-Gibert J, Maldonado-Alameda A, Chimenos JM (2024) Enhancing reactivity in muscovitic clays: mechanical activation as a sustainable alternative to thermal activation for cement production. Appl Clay Sci 250:107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2024.107266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitos M, Badogiannis EG, Tsivilis SG, Perraki M (2015) Pozzolanic activity of thermally and mechanically treated kaolins of hydrothermal origin. Appl Clay Sci 116–117:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tole I, Habermehl-Cwirzen K, Rajczakowska M, Cwirzen A (2018) Activation of a raw clay by mechanochemical process-effects of various parameters on the process efficiency and cementitious properties. Mater 11(10):1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Avet F, Scrivener K (2018) Investigation of the calcined kaolinite content on the hydration of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res 107:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Šavija B, Çopuroğlu O (2023) Fresh properties of limestone-calcined clay-slag cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos 138:104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maraghechi H, Avet F, Wong H, Kamyab H, Scrivener K (2018) Performance of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) with various kaolinite contents with respect to chloride transport. Mater Struct 51(5):125. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1255-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zunino F, Scrivener K (2021) The reaction between metakaolin and limestone and its effect in porosity refinement and mechanical properties. Cem Concr Res 140:106307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai J, Wang Q, Xie C, Xue Y, Duan Y, Cui X (2019) The effect of fineness on the hydration activity index of ground granulated blast furnace slag. Mater 12(18):2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12182984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawrence P, Cyr M, Ringot E (2005) Mineral admixtures in mortars effect of type, amount and fineness of fine constituents on compressive strength. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lutterotti L (2000) MAUD: a Rietveld analysis program designed for the internet and experiment integration. Acta Crystallogr Sect A Found Crystallogr 56:S54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mañosa J, la Rosa JC, Silvello A, Maldonado-Alameda A, Chimenos JM (2023) Kaolinite structural modifications induced by mechanical activation. Appl Clay Sci 238:106918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2023.106918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ardoğa MK (2014) Effect of particle size on heat of hydration of pozzolan incorporated cements, MSc Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Türkiye

  34. ASTM C311/C311M-22 (2022) Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural Pozzolans for use in Portland-cement concrete, annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  35. Kassa AE, Shibeshi NT, Tizazu BZ (2022) Characterization and optimization of calcination process parameters for extraction of aluminum from Ethiopian kaolinite. Int J Chem Eng 2022:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5072635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elimbi A, Tchakoute HK, Njopwouo D (2011) Effects of calcination temperature of kaolinite clays on the properties of geopolymer cements. Constr Build Mater 25(6):2805–2812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Garg N, Skibsted J (2016) Pozzolanic reactivity of a calcined interstratified illite/smectite (70/30) clay. Cem Concr Res 79:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. He C, Makovicky E, Øsbæck B (1995) Thermal stability and pozzolanic activity of calcined illite. Appl Clay Sci 9(5):337–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(94)00033-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Seiffarth T, Hohmann M, Posern K, Kaps C (2013) Effect of thermal pre-treatment conditions of common clays on the performance of clay-based geopolymeric binders. Appl Clay Sci 73:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Garg N, Skibsted J (2019) Dissolution kinetics of calcined kaolinite and montmorillonite in alkaline conditions: evidence for reactive Al(V) sites. J Am Ceram Soc 102(12):7720–7734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferreiro S, Canut MMC, Lund J, Herfort D (2019) Influence of fineness of raw clay and calcination temperature on the performance of calcined clay-limestone blended cements. Appl Clay Sci 169:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zunino F, Boehm-Courjault E, Scrivener K (2020) The impact of calcite impurities in clays containing kaolinite on their reactivity in cement after calcination. Mater Struct 53(2):44. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01654-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. ASTM C563-20 (2020) Standard guide for approximation of optimum SO3 in hydraulic cement, annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  44. Zunino F, Scrivener K (2019) The influence of the filler effect on the sulfate requirement of blended cements. Cem Concr Res 126:105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Canbek O, Szeto C, Washburn NR, Kurtis KE (2023) A quantitative approach to determining sulfate balance for LC3. Cem 12:100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cement.2023.100063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. ASTM C305-20 (2020) Standard practice for mechanical mixing of hydraulic cement pastes and mortars of plastic consistency, annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  47. ASTM C1437-20 (2020) Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar, annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  48. ASTM C109/109M (2020) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or cube specimens), Annual Book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  49. Batool F, Prasad NGN, Bindiganavile V (2018) Statistical modeling of thermal conductivity for cement-based foam. J Build Eng 19:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Miranda-Trevino JC, Coles CA (2003) Kaolinite properties, structure and influence of metal retention on pH. Appl Clay Sci 23(1–4):133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00095-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen Y, Zhang Y, He S, Liang X, Schlangen E, Çopuroğlu O (2023) Improving structural build-up of limestone-calcined clay-cement pastes by using inorganic additives. Construct Build Mater 392:131959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bhavani S, Prasad MLV (2023) Strength and durability properties of SCC developed using limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Briki Y, Zajac M, Ben Haha M, Scrivener K (2021) Impact of limestone fineness on cement hydration at early age. Cem Concr Res 147:106515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bahhou A, Taha Y, Hakkou R, Benzaazoua M, Tagnit-Hamou A (2024) Assessment of hydration, strength, and microstructure of three different grades of calcined marls derived from phosphate by-products. J Build Eng 84:108640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu Y, Alessi DS, Flynn SL, Alam MS, Hao W, Gingras M, Zhao H, Konhauser KO (2018) Acid-base properties of kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite at marine ionic strength. Chem Geol 483:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ma H (2014) Mercury intrusion porosimetry in concrete technology: tips in measurement, pore structure parameter acquisition and application. J Porous Mater 21(2):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-013-9765-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao B, Liu L, Cheng H (2021) Rational design of kaolinite-based photocatalytic materials for environment decontamination. Appl Clay Sci 208:106098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson MJ, Wilson L, Patey I (2014) The influence of individual clay minerals on formation damage of reservoir sandstones: a critical review with some new insights. Clay Miner 49(2):147–164. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2014.049.2.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Koenig A (2020) Analysis of air voids in cementitious materials using micro X-ray computed tomography (µXCT). Constr Build Mater 244:118313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Li N, Yu S, Fang J, Yu Y, Jiang P, Pu S, Wang W (2022) Performance and mechanism of illite in removing graphene oxide from aqueous solution. Appl Clay Sci 230:106711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou H (2016) Mixture of palygorskite and montmorillonite (Paly-Mont) and its adsorptive application for mycotoxins. Appl Clay Sci 131:140–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang R, Peng Y, Zhou M, Shou D (2016) Smart montmorillonite-polypyrrole scaffolds for electro-responsive drug release. Appl Clay Sci 134:50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Florea MVA, Brouwers HJH (2012) Chloride binding related to hydration products. Cem Concr Res 42(2):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pantić V, Šupić S, Vučinić-Vasić M, Nemeš T, Malešev M, Lukić I, Radonjanin V (2023) Effects of grinding methods and water-to-binder ratio on the properties of cement mortars blended with biomass ash and ceramic powder. Mater 16(6):2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mboya HA, King’ondu CK, Njau KN, Mrema AL (2017) Measurement of pozzolanic activity index of scoria, pumice, and rice husk ash as potential supplementary cementitious materials for Portland cement. Adv Civ Eng 2017:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6952645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Maier M, Sposito R, Beuntner N, Thienel KC (2022) Particle characteristics of calcined clays and limestone and their impact on early hydration and sulfate demand of blended cement. Cem Concr Res 154:106736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Berodier E, Scrivener K (2014) Understanding the filler effect on the nucleation and growth of C-S-H. J Am Ceram Soc 97(12):3764–3773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Antoni M, Rossen J, Martirena F, Scrivener K (2012) Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cem Concr Res 42(12):1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rodriguez C, Tobon JI (2020) Influence of calcined clay/limestone, sulfate and clinker proportions on cement performance. Constr Build Mater 251:119050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119050

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Muhammet Atasever

    Present address: Department of Civil Engineering, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, 38080, Turkey

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey

    Muhammet Atasever & Sinan Turhan Erdoğan

Authors
  1. Muhammet Atasever
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sinan Turhan Erdoğan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammet Atasever.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atasever, M., Erdoğan, S.T. Effects of clay type and component fineness on the hydration and properties of limestone calcined clay cement. Mater Struct 57, 183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-024-02461-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-024-02461-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation