Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Properties and occurrence of clay resources for use as supplementary cementitious materials: a paper of RILEM TC 282-CCL

  • RILEM TC 282 - CCL, Calcined Clays as Supplementary Cementitious Materials
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of clays as resource of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) for a new generation of low-carbon cements and concretes is currently the subject of intense research efforts. To this purpose, a large number of clay resources have been explored, characterized and evaluated. This paper introduces the basic knowledge and concepts on clay occurrence and clay mineralogy, before presenting up-to-date knowledge on properties and occurrence of clay resources suitable for use as SCMs. Occurrence, distribution and chemical and mineralogical selection criteria are discussed for kaolinitic clays, which often show superior reactivity and performance. 2:1 clay mineral resources have received somewhat less attention as SCM resources, however recent developments indicate significant potential for calcined impure common clays, and are reviewed. An overview of ubiquitous clay mineral-bearing waste materials also identifies important opportunities for alternative clay sourcing in mining or extraction residues, and dredged or excavated sediments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guggenheim S, Martin RT, Alietti A et al (1995) Definition of clay and clay mineral: joint report of the AIPEA nomenclature and CMS nomenclature committees. Clays Clay Miner 43:255–256. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1995.0430213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM D2487-17e1 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system)

  3. Moore DM, Reynolds RCJ (1989) X-ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals. Oxford University Press (OUP)

  4. Heller-Kallai L (2006) Thermally modified clay minerals. In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G (eds) Handbook of clay science, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, pp 289–308

  5. Sabir B, Wild S, Bai J (2001) Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 23:441–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00092-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scrivener K, Martirena F, Bishnoi S, Maity S (2018) Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem Concr Res 114:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He C, Makovicky E, Osback B (1994) Thermal stability and pozzolanic activity of calcined kaolin. Appl Clay Sci 9:165–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(94)90018-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider M, Romer M, Tschudin M, Bolio H (2011) Sustainable cement production—present and future. Cem Concr Res 41:642–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Geological Survey (2018) Mineral commodity summaries 2018: U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, Virginia, United States

  10. Christidis GE (2011) Industrial clays. EMU Notes Mineral 9:341–414

  11. Murray HH (2007) Applied clay mineralogy: occurrences, processing and applications of kaolins, bentonites, palygorskite-sepiolite, and common clays. Developments in Clay Science, 2, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

  12. Brigatti MF, Galán E, Theng BKG (2006) Structure and mineralogy of clay minerals. In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G (eds) Handbook of clay science, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, pp 19–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Guggenheim S, Adams JM, Bain DC et al (2006) Summary of recommendations of nomenclature committees relevant to clay mineralogy: report of the Association Internationale pour l’Etude des Argiles (AIPEA) Nomenclature Committee for 2006. Clay Miner 41:863–877. https://doi.org/10.1180/0009855064140225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blatt H, Middleton GV, Murray RC (1972) Origin of sedimentary rocks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., United States

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pruett RJ (2016) Kaolin deposits and their uses: Northern Brazil and Georgia, USA. Appl Clay Sci 131:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galán E (2006) Genesis of clay minerals. In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G (eds) Handbook of clay science, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, pp 1129–1161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gräfe M, McFarlane A, Klauber C (2017) Clays and the minerals processing value chain (MPVC). In: Clays in the minerals processing value chain. Cambridge University Press, pp 1–80

  18. Ito A, Wagai R (2017) Global distribution of clay-size minerals on land surface for biogeochemical and climatological studies. Sci Data 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DESA UN (2019) World Population Prospects 2019. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs

  20. Guggenheim S, Hillier S, Jaynes W et al (2015) The clay minerals society glossary for clay science project. The Clay Minerals Society, Virgínia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan P, Tan D, Annabi-Bergaya F et al (2013) From platy kaolinite to aluminosilicate nanoroll via one-step delamination of kaolinite: effect of the temperature of intercalation. Appl Clay Sci 83:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khalifa AZ, Cizer Ö, Pontikes Y et al (2020) Advances in alkali-activation of clay minerals. Cem Concr Res 132:106050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Joussein E, Petit S, Churchman J et al (2005) Halloysite clay minerals—a review. Clay Miner 40:383–426. https://doi.org/10.1180/0009855054040180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Díaz AA, Reyes RSA, Carratalá FA et al (2020) The Experience of Cuba TRC on the Survey of Kaolinitic Clay Deposits as Source of SCMs–-Main Outcomes and Learned Lessons. In: Bishnoi S (ed) Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dill HG (2016) Kaolin: Soil, rock and ore: From the mineral to the magmatic, sedimentary and metamorphic environments. Earth-Science Rev 161:16–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández R, Martirena F, Scrivener KL (2011) The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: a comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cem Concr Res 41:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tironi A, Trezza M, Scian A, Irassar E (2012) Kaolinitic calcined clays: factors affecting its performance as pozzolans. Constr Build Mater 28:276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Antoni M, Rossen J, Martirena F, Scrivener K (2012) Cement substitution by blends of metakaolin and limestone. Cem Concr Res 42:1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006

  29. Avet F, Snellings R, Alujas Diaz A et al (2016) Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays. Cem Concr Res 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015

  30. Beuntner N, Sposito R, Thienel K-C (2019) Potential of calcined mixed-layer clays as pozzolans in concrete. ACI Mater J 116:19–29. https://doi.org/10.14359/51716677

  31. IEA/CSI-WBCSD (2018) Technology roadmap: low-carbon transition in the cement industry. Paris (France) and Geneva (Switzerland)

  32. Velde B (1995) Origin and mineralogy of clays. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Clays and the environment

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Meunier A (2005) Clays. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  34. Righi D, Meunier A (1995) Origin of clays by rock weathering and soil formation. In: Velde B (ed) Origin and mineralogy of clays. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Clays and the environment, pp 43–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Velde BB, Meunier A (2008) The origin of clay minerals in soils and weathered rocks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. British Geological Survey, BRITPITS. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/datasets/britpits/

  37. U.S. Geological Survey (2017) Mineral commodity summaries 2017: U.S. Geological Survey. Virginia, USA

  38. Lorenz W, Gwosdz W (1997) Bewertungskriterien für Industrieminerale, Steine und Erden. Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe H, Teil1:Tone. Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 1–108

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alujas Díaz A, Almenares Reyes RS, Arcial Carratalá F, Martirena Hernández JF (2018) Proposal of a methodology for the preliminary assessment of kaolinitic clay deposits as a source of SCMs. In: Martirena F, Favier A, Scrivener K (eds) Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 29–34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Lorentz BX (2020) Low-Grade kaolin clay natural resource for use as a supplementary cementitious material in structural concrete elements. University of South Florida

  41. Jaskulski R, Józwiak-Niedzwiedzka D, Yakymechko Y (2020) Calcined clay as supplementary cementitious material. Mater (Basel) 13:4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cabrera E, Almenares R, Alujas A (2018) Assessment of the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays by a rapid alkaline solubility test. In: Martirena F, Favier A, Scrivener K (eds) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 98–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Hollanders S, Adriaens R, Skibsted J et al (2016) Pozzolanic reactivity of pure calcined clays. Appl Clay Sci 132–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.08.003

  44. He C, Makovicky E, Osbæck B (1996) Thermal treatment and pozzolanic activity of Na- and Ca-montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci 10:351–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(95)00037-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Habert G, Choupay N, Escadeillas G et al (2009) Clay content of argillites: Influence on cement based mortars. Appl Clay Sci 43:322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hanein T, Thienel K-C, Zunino F et al (2022) Clay calcination technology: state-of-the-art review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL. Mater Struct 55:3. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01807-6

  47. Danner T, Justnes H, Norden G, Østnor T (2015) Feasibility of calcined marl as an alternative pozzolanic material. In: Scrivener K, Favier A (eds) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Msinjili NS, Gluth GJG, Sturm P, Vogler NH-CK (2019) Comparison of calcined illitic clays (brick clays) and low-grade kaolinitic clays as supplementary cementitious materials. Mater Struct 52:94. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1393-2

  49. Emmerich K, Madsen FT, Kahr G (1999) Dehydroxylation behavior of heat-treated and steam-treated homoionic cis-vacant montmorillonites. Clays Clay Miner 47:591–604. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tsipursky SI, Drits VA (1984) The distribution of octahedral cations in the 2:1 layers of dioctahedral smectites studied by oblique-texture electron diffraction. Clay Miner 19:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Drits VA, Besson G, Muller F (1995) An improved model for structural transformations of heat-treated aluminous dioctahedral 2:1 layer silicates. Clays Clay Miner 43:718–731. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1995.0430608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liebig E, Althaus E (1997) Kaolinite and montmorillonite as pozzolanic components in lime mortars-untreated and after thermal activation. ZKG Int 50:282–290

    Google Scholar 

  53. Garg N, Skibsted J (2014) Thermal activation of a pure montmorillonite clay and its reactivity in cementitious systems. J Phys Chem C 118:11464–11477. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502529d

  54. He C, Osbaeck B, Makovicky E (1995) Pozzolanic reactions of six principal clay minerals: activation, reactivity assessments and technological effects. Cem Concr Res 25:1691–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bergaya F, Lagaly G (2013) Introduction to clay science: techniques and applications. In: Developments in clay science. Elsevier, pp 1–7

  56. Dietel J, Warr LN, Bertmer M et al (2017) The importance of specific surface area in the geopolymerization of heated illitic clay. Appl Clay Sci 139:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Irassar EF, Cordoba G, Zito S et al (2019) Durability of blended cements containing illitic calcined clays. In: 15th international congress on the chemistry of cement, ICCC. Praga, Czech Republic, p 11

  58. Emmerich K (2011) Thermal analysis in the characterization and processing of industrial minerals. In: Christidis GE (ed) Advances in the characterization of industrial minerals. EMU Notes in Mineralogy and the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London

  59. He C, Makovicky E, Øsbæck B (1995) Thermal stability and pozzolanic activity of calcined illite. Appl Clay Sci 9:337–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(94)00033-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mstnor T, Justnes H, Danner T (2015) Reactivity and microstructure of calcined marl as supplementary cementitious material. In: Scrivener K, Favier A (eds) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 237–244

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  61. Snellings R, Cizer Ö, Horckmans L et al (2016) Properties and pozzolanic reactivity of flash calcined dredging sediments. Appl Clay Sci 129:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Snellings R, Horckmans L, Van Bunderen C et al (2017) Flash-calcined dredging sediment blended cements: effect on cement hydration and properties. Mater Struct 50:241. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1108-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bullerjahn F, Zajac M, Pekarkova J, Nied D (2020) Novel SCM produced by the co-calcination of aluminosilicates with dolomite. Cem Concr Res 134:106083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lemke J, Berger C (2018) Thermal processing of calcined clay. In: Martirena F, Favier A, Scrivener K (eds) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 262–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Zunino F, Boehm-courjault E, Scrivener K (2020) The impact of calcite impurities in clays containing kaolinite on their reactivity in cement after calcination. Mater Struct 53:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01478-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. He C, Makovicky E, Osb B (1996) Thermal treatment and pozzolanic activity of sepiolite. Appl Clay Sci 10:337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(95)00035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Poussardin V, Paris M, Tagnit-Hamou A, Deneele D (2020) Potential for calcination of a palygorskite-bearing argillaceous carbonate. Appl Clay Sci 198:105846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shi T, Liu Y, Zhang Y et al (2022) Calcined attapulgite clay as supplementary cementing material: thermal treatment, hydration activity and mechanical properties. Int J Concr Struct Mater 16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-022-00499-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mielenz RC, Greene KT, Schieltz NC (1951) Natural pozzolans for concrete. Econ Geol 46:311–328. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.46.3.311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kalousek GL, Porter LC, Benton EJ (1972) Concrete for long-time service in sulfate environment. Cem Concr Res 2:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(72)90025-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Price WH (1975) Pozzolans—a review. J Am Concr Inst 72:225–232

  72. Pepper L, Mather B (2004) Effectiveness of mineral admxtures in preventing excessive expansion of concrete due to alkali aggregate reaction. Publ Am Concr Inst 223:23–54

    Google Scholar 

  73. de Souza SP (2001) Industrial clays in Brazil: a review. Clay Odyssey 1:323

    Google Scholar 

  74. Buchwald A, Hohmann M, Posern K, Brendler E (2009) The suitability of thermally activated illite/smectite clay as raw material for geopolymer binders. Appl Clay Sci 46:300–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Seiffarth T, Hohmann M, Posern K, Kaps C (2013) Effect of thermal pre-treatment conditions of common clays on the performance of clay-based geopolymeric binders. Appl Clay Sci 73:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Valentini L, Contessi S, Dalconi MC et al (2018) Alkali-activated calcined smectite clay blended with waste calcium carbonate as a low-carbon binder. J Clean Prod 184:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ferreiro S, Canut MMC, Lund J, Herfort D (2019) Influence of fineness of raw clay and calcination temperature on the performance of calcined clay-limestone blended cements. Appl Clay Sci 169:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schulze SE, Rickert J (2019) Suitability of natural calcined clays as supplementary cementitious material. Cem Concr Compos 95:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Trümer A, Ludwig HM, Schellhorn M, Diedel R (2019) Effect of a calcined Westerwald bentonite as supplementary cementitious material on the long-term performance of concrete. Appl Clay Sci 168:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Trümer A, Ludwig HM, Rohloff K (2014) Investigations into the application of calcined clays as composite material in cement. ZKG Int 9:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  81. Beuntner N, Thienel KC (2017) Performance and properties of concrete made with calcined clays. Publ Am Concr Inst 320:7.1–7.12

  82. Irassar EF, Bonavetti VL, Castellano CC et al (2019) Calcined illite-chlorite shale as supplementary cementing material: thermal treatment, grinding, color and pozzolanic activity. Appl Clay Sci 179:105143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.105143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Chucholowski C, Holger M, Thienel KC (2018) Improving the recyclability, environmental compatibility, and CO2 balance of autoclaved aerated concrete by replacing sulfate carrier and cement with calcined clays. ce/papers 2:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.846

  84. Huggett J, Knox ROB (2006) Clay mineralogy of the Tertiary onshore and offshore strata of the British Isles. Clay Miner 41:5–46. https://doi.org/10.1180/0009855064110195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhou D, Wang R, Tyrer M et al (2017) Sustainable infrastructure development through use of calcined excavated waste clay as a supplementary cementitious material. J Clean Prod 168:1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Huggett JM, Gale AS (1998) Petrography and diagenesis of the Thames Group at Whitecliff Bay, Isle of Wight, UK. Proc Geol Assoc 109:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7878(98)80010-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Abulnaga BE (2018) Dredging the clays of the Nile: potential challenges and opportunities on the shores of the Aswan high dam reservoir and the Nile Valley in Egypt. In: Negm A, Abdel-Fattah S (eds) Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam Versus Aswan High Dam. The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Cham, pp 331–355

  88. Adriaens R, Zeelmaekers E, Fettweis M et al (2018) Quantitative clay mineralogy as provenance indicator for recent muds in the southern North Sea. Mar Geol 398:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2017.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kazemi-Kamyab H, Henry M, Haouche L, Snellings R (2019) Evaluation of calcined dredged sediments as supplementary cementitious materials. In: 2nd international conference of sustainable building materials. Eindhoven The Netherlands

  90. Benzerzour M, Amar M, Abriak NE (2017) New experimental approach of the reuse of dredged sediments in a cement matrix by physical and heat treatment. Constr Build Mater 140:432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Benzerzour M, Maherzi W, Amar MA et al (2018) Formulation of mortars based on thermally treated sediments. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0626-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Safhi AEM, Rivard P, Yahia A et al (2020) Valorization of dredged sediments in self-consolidating concrete: Fresh, hardened, and microstructural properties. J Clean Prod 263:121472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Van Bunderen C, Benboudjema F, Snellings R et al (2020) Experimental analysis and modelling of mechanical properties and shrinkage of concrete recycling flash calcined dredging sediments. Cem Concr Compos 115:103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Van Bunderen C, Snellings R, Vandewalle L, Cizer Ö (2019) Early-age hydration and autogenous deformation of cement paste containing flash calcined dredging sediments. Constr Build Mater 200:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Maier M, Forster B, Beuntner N, Thienel KC (2020) Potential of a calcined recycling kaolin from silica sand processing as supplementary cementitious material. In: Bishnoi S (ed) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Singapore, pp 75–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  96. Gou M, Zhou L, Then NWY (2019) Utilization of tailings in cement and concrete: a review. Sci Eng Compos Mater 26:449–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Schmitz M, Röhling S, Dohrmann R (2011) In der grobkeramischen Industrie nutzbares Potenzial der bei der Gewinnung und Aufbereitung in der deutschen Steine- und Erden- Industrie anfallenden Feinanteile. DERA Rohstoffinformation 5:76

    Google Scholar 

  98. Pera J, Amrouz A (1998) Development of highly reactive metakaolin from paper sludge. Adv Cem Based Mater 7:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Longhi MA, Rodríguez ED, Bernal SA et al (2016) Valorisation of a kaolin mining waste for the production of geopolymers. J Clean Prod 115:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.011

  100. Wong RCK, Gillott JE, Law S et al (2004) Calcined oil sands fine tailings as a supplementary cementing material for concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Choi YW, Kim YJ, Choi O et al (2009) Utilization of tailings from tungsten mine waste as a substitution material for cement. Constr Build Mater 23:2481–2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.006

  102. Vargas F, Lopez M (2018) Development of a new supplementary cementitious material from the activation of copper tailings: Mechanical performance and analysis of factors. J Clean Prod 182:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Highley D, Brown T, Harrison D et al (2009) Mineral planning factsheet: kaolin. Nottingham, UK

  104. Vráblík P, Řehoř M, Schmidt P et al (2018) Clay sorbents in the area of the Most and Sokolov basins as a possible use in agriculture reclamations. Agric Sci 09:1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.912113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Wang B, Sui T, Sui H (2020) Identification and activation of coal gangue and performance of limestone calcined gangue cement. In: Bishnoi S (ed) Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Springer, Singapore, pp 381–389

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  106. Avet F, Scrivener K (2018) Investigation of the calcined kaolinite content on the hydration of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res 107:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all members of RILEM TC-282 CCL for their insight during the preparation and reviewing of this paper. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support and practical contributions of Professor Dr. José Fernando Martirena to the section regarding kaolinitic clays, as this section grew out from ideas previously developed and presented within his workgroup.

Funding

Participation of Alastair T. Marsh was funded by EPSRC EP/R001642/1. The other authors received no support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Initiation and conceptualisation: AAD and RS; Data provision and processing: AAD and RS; Writing of sections: AAD, RS, TH, EFI, MJ, FK, MM, ATM, TS, K-CT, LV, BW, FZ; Critical revising: AAD, MJ, RSA, RS, K-CT; Coordination, integration and editing: AAD and RS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Alujas Diaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

TC Membership

Chair Prof. Fernando Martirena-Hernandez.

Deputy Chair Prof. Manu Santhanam.

Members Sumaiya Afroz, Laith Al-Jaberi, Adrian Alujas Diaz, Francois Avet, Tushar Bansal, Hoda Beltagui, Mohsen Ben Haha, Susan Bernal Lopez, Shashank Bishnoi, Pascal Boustingorry, Mariana Canut, Arnaud Castel, Vinh Dao, Frank Dehn, Yuvaraj Dhandapani, Pascal Dion, Jan Elsen, Gilles Escadeillas, Ivan Escalante-Garcia, Hassan Ez-zaki, Sergio Ferreiro Garzón, Daniel Geddes, Guoqing Geng, Ravindra Gettu, Theodore Hanein, Edgardo Irassar, Roman Jaskulski, Shiju Joseph, Maria C. Garci Juenger, Sri Kalyana Rama Jyosyula, Fragkoulis Kanavaris, Taehwan Kim, Wolfgang Kunther, David Law, Alisa Machner, Matthias Maier, Alastair Marsh, Fernando Martirena Hernandez, Fabrizio Moro, Joseph Mwiti Marangu, Angela Maria Nunes, Katelyn O Quinn, Anuj Parashar, Sol Moi Park, Gabriel Pham, Victor Poussardin, John Provis, Elsa Qoku, Kyle Riding, Roger Samuel Almenares, Manu Santhanam, Karyne Santos, Karen Scrivener, Jorgen Skibsted, Ruben Snellings, Tongbo Sui, Arezki Tagnit-Hamou, Karl-Christian Thienel, Luca Valentini, Oscar Oswaldo Vazquez, Luis Velasquez, Manuel Vieira, Silvia Vieira, Talakokula Visalakshi, Claire White, William Wilson, Kequan Yu, Zengfeng Zhao, Wenzhong Zhu and Franco Zunino.

This paper has been prepared by Working Group 1 within RILEM TC 282-CCL. the paper has been reviewed and approved by all members of the TC.

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the validity and accuracy of presented data, and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organisations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alujas Diaz, A., Almenares Reyes, R.S., Hanein, T. et al. Properties and occurrence of clay resources for use as supplementary cementitious materials: a paper of RILEM TC 282-CCL. Mater Struct 55, 139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01972-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01972-2

Keywords

Navigation