Skip to main content
Log in

Cement and hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose interaction: The performance of cement-based adhesives

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 April 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Cellulose ethers are often used to improve the properties of cement-based ceramic adhesives during their setting and hardening stages. The chemical and structural characteristics of a cellulose ether significantly improve some properties like the rheological and water retention characteristics as well as the mechanical properties of the adhesives. Since the effects of cement type are seldom studied in literature, this study aims to examine how the interaction of different cellulose ether-cement combinations will affect the properties of ceramic adhesives. In the experimental program, five different cement types and four different cellulose ethers based on hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose (HEMC) were utilized to obtain 20 ceramic adhesives. The performance of the adhesives was determined using the readily available standards. It was found out that in addition to HEMC type, the cement type has an effect on the properties of ceramic adhesives. As a result, it was shown that the cement fineness is also a parameter that contributes to the physical jamming effect of the cellulose ether molecules, thus affecting the water retention properties of the ceramic adhesives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Pourchez J, Ruot B, Debayle J, Pourchez E, Grosseau P (2010) Some aspects of cellulose ethers influence on water transport and porous structure of cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 40:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petit JY, Wirquin E (2013) Evaluation of various cellulose ethers performance in ceramic tile adhesive mortars. Int J Adhes Adhes 40:202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pourchez J, Grosseau P, Ruot B (2010) Changes in C3S hydration in the presence of cellulose ethers. Cem Concr Res 40:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jenni A, Holzer L, Zurbriggen R, Herwegh M (2005) Influence of polymers on microstructure and adhesive strength of cementitious tile adhesive mortars. Cem Concr Res 35:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brumaud C, Bessaies-Bey H, Mohler C, Baumann R, Schmitz M, Radler M, Roussel N (2013) Cellulose ethers and water retention. Cem Concr Res 53:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Müller I (2006) Influence of cellulose ethers on the kinetics of early portland cement hydration. Universität Karlsruhe, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patural L, Marchal P, Govin A, Grosseau P, Ruot B, Devès O (2011) Cellulose ethers influence on water retention and consistency in cement-based mortars. Cem Concr Res 41:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pichniarczyk P, Niziurska M (2015) Properties of ceramic tile adhesives modified by different viscosity hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Constr Build Mater 77:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Desbrieres J (1993) Cement cake properties in static filtration. Influence of polymeric additives on cement filter cake permeability. Cem Concr Res 23:347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(93)90100-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desbrieres J (1993) Cement cake properties in static filtration. on the role of fluid loss control additives on the cake porosity. Cem Concr Res 23:1431–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khayat KH (1998) Viscosity-enhancing admixtures for cement-based materials — an overview. Cem Concr Compos 20:171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(98)80006-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peschard A, Govin A, Grosseau P, Guilhot B, Guyonnet R (2004) Effect of polysaccharides on the hydration of cement paste at early ages. Cem Concr Res 34:2153–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Betioli AM, Gleize PJP, Silva DA, John VM, Pileggi RG (2009) Effect of HMEC on the consolidation of cement pastes: Isothermal calorimetry versus oscillatory rheometry. Cem Concr Res 39:440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weyer HJ, Müller I, Schmitt B, Bosbach D, Putnis A (2005) Time-resolved monitoring of cement hydration: Influence of cellulose ethers on hydration kinetics. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 238:102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pourchez J, Grosseau P, Ruot B (2009) Current understanding of cellulose ethers impact on the hydration of C3A and C3A-sulphate systems. Cem Concr Res 39:664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen DD, Devlin LP, Koshy P, Sorrell CC (2014) Impact of water-soluble cellulose ethers on polymer-modified mortars. J Mater Sci 49:923–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7732-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bülichen D, Kainz J, Plank J (2012) Working mechanism of methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose ( MHEC ) as water retention agent. Cem Concr Res 42:953–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marliere C, Mabrouk E, Lamblet M, Coussot P (2012) How water retention in porous media with cellulose ethers works. Cem Concr Res 42:1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurnaus T, Plank J (2019) Adsorption of non-ionic cellulose ethers on cement revisited. Constr Build Mater 195:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pourchez J, Peschard A, Grosseau P, Guyonnet R, Guilhot B, Vallée F (2006) HPMC and HEMC influence on cement hydration. Cem Concr Res 36:288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhi Hua O, Bao Guo M, Shou Wei J (2012) Influence of cellulose ethers molecular parameters on hydration kinetics of Portland cement at early ages. Constr Build Mater 33:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Omikrine Metalssi O, Aït-Mokhtar A, Ruot B (2014) Influence of cellulose ether on hydration and carbonation kinetics of mortars. Cem Concr Compos 49:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pierre A, Perrot A, Picandet V, Guevel Y (2015) Cellulose ethers and cement paste permeability. Cem Concr Res 72:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. EN 197–1, (2011) Cement composition specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. CEN, Brussels.

  25. ASTM C1437–15 (2015) Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1437-15.2

  26. EN 12004–2 (2017) Adhesives for ceramic tiles - Part 2: Test methods. CEN, Brussels.

  27. EN 196–1 (2016) Methods of testing cement. Determination of strength. CEN, Brussels.

  28. EN 12004–1 (2017) Adhesives for ceramic tiles - Part 1: requirements, assessment and verification of constancy of performance, classification and marking. CEN, Brussels.

  29. ASTM C 1506–16b (2016) Standard test method for water retention of hydraulic cement-based mortars and plasters, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, https://doi.org/10.1520/C1506-16B.

  30. EN 196–3, Methods of testing cement - Part 3: Determination of setting times and soundness. CEN, Brussels.

  31. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2006) Concrete: microstructure, properties and materials, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Cansu Ustoglu for her contribution in the experimental program.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meltem Tanguler-Bayramtan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In this article the affiliation details for Ismail Ozgur Yaman were incorrectly given as ‘CIMSA Cement Industry and Trade Inc., Mersin, Turkey’ but should have been ‘Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Universiteler Mah, Dumlupınar Blv. No:1, 06800 Ankara, Turkey’.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanguler-Bayramtan, M., Alam, B., Sucu, M. et al. Cement and hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose interaction: The performance of cement-based adhesives. Mater Struct 55, 91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01937-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01937-5

Keywords

Navigation