Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of conventional and equivalent mortar volume mix design methods for recycled aggregate concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is undoubtedly on the increase and further research is required for more appropriate mix design methods. This paper presents the result of investigations into the mix design of RAC. The study examined experimentally two conventional and one unconventional mix design methods. The conventional methods include the absolute volume approach according to the American Concrete Institute (ACI) standard and the Department of Environment (DoE) concrete mix design method given by the British specification. The unconventional method is a new technique dubbed “Equivalent mortar volume (EMV)” method developed to incorporate both fine and coarse recycled aggregates for RAC production. A total of four mixes were designed as follows: (1) natural aggregate concrete regarded as the reference mix using the ACI guide, (2) RAC using the ACI guide, (3) RAC using the DoE guide and (4) blended aggregate concrete using the EMV guide. Fresh concrete properties were tested, and twenty concrete cubes and eighteen cylinders were produced accordingly and tested after curing by water immersion for density, compressive strength, tensile splitting strength and water absorption. The results showed that the EMV mix design method used significantly lesser amount of cement to achieve a RAC of higher strength than those obtained from its comparable conventional methods even with original natural aggregates. This is the first work on mix design of RAC incorporating both coarse and fine crushed concrete aggregates carried out using the EMV method. This research highlights that the ACI and DoE mix design method guides should be reviewed and amended appropriately, before adopting them for RAC mix design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anike EE, Saidani M, Ganjian E, Tyrer M, Olubanwo AO (2019) The potency of recycled aggregate in new concrete: a review. Constr Innov 19:594–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-07-2018-0056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oikonomou ND (2005) Recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 27:315–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2004.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajdukiewicz A, Kliszczewicz A (2002) Influence of recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of HS/HPC. Cem Concr Compos 24:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00012-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas A, Fathifazl G, Isgor OB, Razaqpur AG, Fournier B (2007) Proposed method for determining the residual mortar. J ASTM Int 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fathifazl G, Abbas A, Razaqpur AG, Isgor OB, Fournier B, Foo S (2009) New mixture proportioning method for concrete made with coarse recycled concrete aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 21:601–611. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:10(601)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belin P, Habert G, Thiery M, Roussel N (2013) Cement paste content and water absorption of recycled concrete coarse aggregates. Mater Struct Constr 47:1451–1465. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0128-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Etxeberria M, Marí AR, Vázquez E (2007) Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material. Mater Struct 40:529–541. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9161-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbas A, Fathifazl G, Isgor OB, Razaqpur AG, Fournier B, Foo S (2009) Durability of recycled aggregate concrete designed with equivalent mortar volume method. Cem Concr Compos 31:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta PK, Bhatia R (2013) Study of engineering properties of recycled concrete aggregate concrete. I-Manager’s J Struct Eng 2:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Younis KH, Pilakoutas K, Guadagnini M, Angelakopoulos H (2014) Feasibility of using recycled steel fibres to enhance the behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete, FRC. Fibre Reinf Concr Des Struct Appl FRC 2014:598–608

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM (2006) Environmental enhancement through use of recycled aggregate concrete in a two-stage mixing approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:277–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030500531653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wardeh G, Ghorbel E, Gomart H (2015) Mix design and properties of recycled aggregate concretes: applicability of Eurocode 2. Int J Concr Struct Mater 9:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-014-0087-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Butler L, West JS, Tighe SL (2013) Effect of recycled concrete coarse aggregate from multiple sources on the hardened properties of concrete with equivalent compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 47:1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahal K (2007) Mechanical properties of concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. Build Environ 42:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pradhan S, Kumar S, Barai SV (2017) Recycled aggregate concrete: particle packing method (PPM) of mix design approach. Constr Build Mater 152:269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez-Soberón JMV (2002) Porosity of recycled concrete with substitution of recycled concrete aggregate: an experimental study. Cem Concr Res 32:1301–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00795-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kou SC, Poon CS, Etxeberria M (2011) Influence of recycled aggregates on long term mechanical properties and pore size distribution of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 33:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Behera M, Bhattacharyya SK, Minocha AK, Deoliya R, Maiti S (2014) Recycled aggregate from C&D waste and its use in concrete: a breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: a review. Constr Build Mater 68:501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM (2005) Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate concrete produced from two-stage mixing approach. J Mater Sci 35:1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0379-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao J, Li J, Zhang C (2005) Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cem Concr Res 35:1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagih AM, El-Karmoty HZ, Ebid M, Okba SH (2013) Recycled construction and demolition concrete waste as aggregate for structural concrete. HBRC J 9:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Corinaldesi V (2011) Structural concrete prepared with coarse recycled concrete aggregate: from investigation to design. Adv Civ Eng 2011:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/283984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen TC, Narud H (1983) Strength of recycled concrete made from crushed concrete coarse aggregate. Concr Int 5:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Der Putten J, Dils J, Minne P, Boel V, De Schutter G (2017) Determination of packing profiles for the verification of the compressible packing model in case of UHPC pastes. Mater Struct Constr. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0986-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moosberg-Bustnes H, Lagerblad B, Forssberg E (2004) The function of fillers in concrete. Mater Struct Constr 37:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1617/13694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunger M, Brouwers HJH (2009) Flow analysis of water-powder mixtures: application to specific surface area and shape factor. Cem Concr Compos 31:39–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulder E, de Jong TPR, Feenstra L (2007) Closed cycle construction: an integrated process for the separation and reuse of C&D waste. Waste Manag 27:1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang L, Wang J, Qian X, Chen P, Xu Y, Guo J (2017) An environmentally friendly method to improve the quality of recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 144:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ismail S, Ramli M (2013) Engineering properties of treated recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for structural applications. Constr Build Mater 44:464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferreira L, de Brito J, Barra M (2011) Influence of the pre-saturation of recycled coarse concrete aggregates on concrete properties. Mag Concr Res 63:617–627. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2011.63.8.617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dhir RK, Limbachiya MC, Leelawat T (1999) Suitability of recycled concrete aggregate for use in BS 5328 designated mixes. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers: structures and buildings, pp 257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang YC, Ye ZM, Vernerey F, Xi Y (2013) Development of processing methods to improve strength of concrete with 100% recycled coarse aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 27:130801045339002

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malešev M, Radonjanin V, Marinković S (2010) Recycled concrete as aggregate for structural concrete production. Sustainability 2:1204–1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2051204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bravo M, de Brito J, Evangelista L, Pacheco J (2017) Superplasticizer’s efficiency on the mechanical properties of recycled aggregates concrete: influence of recycled aggregates composition and incorporation ratio. Constr Build Mater 153:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Afroughsabet V, Biolzi L, Ozbakkaloglu T (2017) Influence of double hooked-end steel fibers and slag on mechanical and durability properties of high performance recycled aggregate concrete. Compos Struct 181:273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amario M, Rangel CS, Pepe M, Toledo Filho RD (2017) Optimization of normal and high strength recycled aggregate concrete mixtures by using packing model. Cem Concr Compos 84:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fathifazl G, Razaqpur AG, Isgor OB, Abbas A, Fournier B, Foo S (2009) Flexural performance of steel-reinforced recycled concrete beams. ACI Struct J 106:858–867. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM C702/C702M-18 (2018) Standard practice for reducing samples of aggregate to testing size. https://doi.org/10.1520/c0702

  39. ACI Committee 211 (2009) ACI 211. 1-91 Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete

  40. Teychenné DC, Franklin RE, Erntroy HC (1997) Design of normal concrete mixes, 2nd edn. Building research establishment Ltd. https://epdf.pub/design-of-normal-concrete-mixes-br-331-ci-sfb.html

  41. BS EN 197-1 (2011) Part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements

  42. BS EN 934-2:2009 +A1:2012 (2012) Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout: part 2: concrete admixtures—Part 2: concrete admixtures—definitions, requirements, conformity, definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling marking

  43. ASTM C672/C672M-12 (2012) Standard test method for scaling resistance of concrete surfaces exposed to deicing chemicals. https://doi.org/10.1520/c0672

  44. BS EN 12350-2 (2009) Testing fresh concrete. Slump-test

  45. NSCS National Structural Concrete Specification for Building Construction (2010) Technical committee, 4th edn

  46. BS 8500-1:2015+A2 (2019) Concrete-complementary British standard to BS EN 206-1; Part 1: method of specifying and guidance for the specifier

  47. BS EN 12390-3 (2009) Testing hardened concrete: part 3—compressive strength of test specimens, vol 3, pp 420–457

  48. BS EN 12390-7 (2009) Testing hardened concrete part 7: density of hardened concrete. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004

  49. BS EN 12390-6 (2009) Testing hardened concrete: part 6—tensile splitting strength of test specimens

  50. BS 1881-122 (2011) Testing concrete part 122: method for determination of water absorption, British Standard International

  51. Esmaeilkhanian B, Khayat KH, Wallevik OH (2017) Mix design approach for low-powder self-consolidating concrete: eco-SCC—content optimization and performance. Mater Struct Constr 50:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-0993-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Boulekbache B, Hamrat M, Chemrouk M, Amziane S (2016) Flexural behaviour of steel fibre-reinforced concrete under cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 126:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Duan ZH, Poon CS (2014) Properties of recycled aggregate concrete made with recycled aggregates with different amounts of old adhered mortars. Mater Des 58:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kang TH-K, Kim W, Kwak Y-K, Hong S-G (2014) flexural testing of reinforced concrete beams with recycled concrete aggregates. ACI Struct J. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Andreu G, Miren E (2014) Experimental analysis of properties of high performance recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 52:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí A, Barra M (2007) Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Res 37:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tabsh SW, Abdelfatah AS (2009) Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 23:1163–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fan CC, Huang R, Hwang H, Chao SJ (2016) Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregates from crushed concrete wastes. Constr Build Mater 112:708–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Xiao JZ, Li JB, Zhang C (2006) On relationships between the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete: an overview. Mater Struct Constr 39:655–664. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9093-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their gratitude to the managements of Litecast HomeFloors Ltd. for their support in providing the materials used for this work.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Built and Natural Environment, Coventry University, 3 Gulson Road, Coventry, CV1 2JH, UK

    Emmanuel E. Anike & Mark Tyrer

  2. School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK

    Messaoud Saidani, Eshmaiel Ganjian & Adegoke O. Olubanwo

Authors
  1. Emmanuel E. Anike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Messaoud Saidani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eshmaiel Ganjian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark Tyrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adegoke O. Olubanwo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel E. Anike.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anike, E.E., Saidani, M., Ganjian, E. et al. Evaluation of conventional and equivalent mortar volume mix design methods for recycled aggregate concrete. Mater Struct 53, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-1457-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-1457-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation