Skip to main content

Bond behavior of iron-based shape memory alloy reinforcing bars embedded in concrete

Abstract

Iron-based shape memory alloys (Fe-SMA) have shown a strong potential for strengthening applications in concrete structures. This paper presents an experimental study on the bond strength and bond-slip behavior of ribbed Fe-SMA bars embedded in concrete. A total of nineteen pullout tests were conducted to study the bond behavior of 16-mm Fe-SMA bars embedded in concrete specimens with different levels of passive confinement. Prior to specimen fabrication, the bars were pre-strained (at 4% or 8%) and then activated by resistive heating after concrete casting. The experimental study considered different activation temperatures (160 °C, 300 °C, and no activation) to evaluate their effects on bond performance. Five specimens with conventional steel bars were also tested to establish a direct comparison with conventional reinforcement. Unconfined pullout specimens failed by splitting of concrete in most of the cases, while confined specimens presented pullout failures and higher bond strengths. In general, the Fe-SMA bars presented similar bond performance as conventional steel bars. However, the bond strength of unconfined specimens was reduced with the activation temperature. For confined specimens, the activation temperature had a minor effect on the bond strength. Local bond stress-slip relations derived from tests have also been compared with two analytical bond-slip laws available in the literature. Finally, the transfer length of Fe-SMA bars in prestressing applications has been estimated based on the experimental data and a simple analytical model of the bond stress distribution along the embedment length of a bar.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Adapted from Michels et al. [28]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. 1.

    Desroches R, McCormick J, Delemont M (2004) Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars. J Struct Eng 130:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    El-Tawil S, Ortega-Rosales J (2004) Prestressing concrete using shape memory alloy tendons. ACI Struct J 101(6):846–851

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ozbulut OE, Hurlebaus S, Desroches R (2011) Seismic response control using shape memory alloys: a review. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 22:1531–1549

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Saiidi MS, O’Brien M, Mahmoud SZ (2009) Cyclic response of concrete bridge columns using superelastic nitinol and bendable concrete. ACI Struct J 106(1):69–77

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Saiidi MS, Wang H (2006) Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement. ACI Struct J 103(3):436–443

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shin M, Andrawes B (2010) Experimental investigation of actively confined concrete using shape memory alloys. Eng Struct 32:656–664

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Janke L, Czaderski C, Motavalli M, Ruth J (2005) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—overview, limits and new ideas. Mater Struct 38:578–592

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cladera A, Weber B, Leinenbach C, Czaderski C, Shahverdi M, Motavalli M (2014) Iron-based shape memory alloys for civil engineering structures: an overview. Constr Build Mater 63:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sato A, Chishima E, Soma K, Mori T (1982) Shape memory effect in \({{\upgamma }}{\leftrightarrows }\epsilon\) transformation in Fe-30Mn-1Si alloy single crystals. Acta Metall 30:1177–1183

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Abouali S, Shahverdi M, Ghassemieh M, Motavalli M (2019) Nonlinear simulation of reinforced concrete beams retrofitted by near-surface mounted iron-based shape memory alloys. Eng Struct 187:133–148

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arabi-Hashemi A, Lee W, Leinenbach C (2018) Recovery stress formation in FeMnSi based shape memory alloys: impact of precipitates, texture and grain size. Mater Des 139:258–268

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baruj A, Bertolino G, Troiani H (2010) Temperature dependence of critical stress and pseudoelasticity in a Fe–Mn–Si–Cr pre-rolled alloy. J Alloys Compd 502(1):54–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen J, Peng H, Yang Q, Wang S, Song F, Wen Y (2016) Effect of carbon content on shape memory effect of Fe-Mn-Si-Cr-Ni-based alloys at different deformation temperatures. Mater Sci Eng, A 677:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Izadi M, Ghafoori E, Shahverdi M, Motavalli M, Maalek S (2018) Development of an iron-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) strengthening system for steel plates. Eng Struct 174:433–446

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim Y, Han S, Choi E, Kim W (2017) Achieving ultrafine grained Fe-Mn-Si shape memory alloys with enhanced shape memory recovery stresses. Mater Sci Eng A 701:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kim Y, Choi E, Kim W (2018) Characterization of the microstructures and the shape memory properties of the Fe-Mn-Si-Cr-Ni-C shape memory alloy after severe plastic deformation by differential speed rolling and subsequent annealing. Mater Charact 136:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lai M, Li Y, Lillpopp L, Ponge D, Will S, Raabe D (2018) On the origin of the improvement of shape memory effect by precipitating VC in Fe–Mn–Si-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 155:222–235

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Min X, Sawaguchi T, Zhang X, Tsuzaki K (2012) Reasons for incomplete shape recovery in polycrystalline Fe–Mn–Si shape memory alloys. Scr Mater 67(1):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shahverdi M, Czaderski C (2019) Long-term behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by iron-based shape memory alloy strips. In: SMAR 2019—fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, pp 1–8

  20. 20.

    Yang Y, Arabi-Hashemi A, Leinenbach C, Shahverdi M (2019) Improvement of FeMnSi based shape memory alloys yield stress by heat treatment. In: SMAR 2019—fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, pp 1–7

  21. 21.

    Sawaguchi T, Nikulin I, Ogawa K, Sekido K, Takamori S, Maruyama T, Chiba Y, Kushibe A, Inoue Y, Tsuzaki K (2015) Designing Fe-Mn-Si alloys with improved low-cycle fatigue lives. Scr Mater 99:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ghafoori E, Hosseini E, Leinenbach C, Michels J, Motavalli M (2017) Fatigue behavior of a Fe-Mn-Si shape memory alloy used for prestressed strengthening. Mater Des 133:349–362

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Heredia Rosa DI, Hartloper A, Sousa A, Lignos D, Motavalli M, Ghafoori E (2019) Behavior of iron-based shape memory alloy under cyclic loading histories. In: SMAR 2019—fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, pp 1–8

  24. 24.

    Khalil W, Saint-Sulpice L, Chirani SA, Bouby C, Mikolajczak A, Zineb TB (2013) Experimental analysis of Fe-based shape memory alloy behavior under thermomechanical cyclic loading. Mech Mater 63:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Koster M, Lee W, Schwarzenberger M, Leinenbach C (2015) Cyclic deformation and structural fatigue behavior of an FE–Mn–Si shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 637:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee W, Weber B, Leinenbach C (2015) Recovery stress formation in a restrained Fe–Mn–Si-based shape memory alloy used for prestressing or mechanical joining. Constr Build Mater 95:600–610

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Leinenbach C, Lee W, Lis A, Arabi-Hashemi A, Cayron C, Weber B (2016) Creep and stress relaxation of a FeMnSi-based shape memory alloy at low temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 677:106–115

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Michels J, Shahverdi M, Czaderski C, El-Hacha R (2018) Mechanical performance of Fe-SMA ribbed bars for concrete prestressing. ACI Mater J 115(6):877–886

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang Y, Breveglieri M, Shahverdi M (2019) Axial stiffness of an Fe-SMA during the activation process. In: SMAR 2019—fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, pp 1–8

  30. 30.

    Zhizhong D, Klotz U, Bergamini A (2010) Auf Eisen, Mangan und Silizium basierende Formgedächtnislegierung. Europäische Patentan-meldung

  31. 31.

    Refer Strengthening Solutions (2019) Re-bar strengthening of reinforced concrete. Product data sheet. http://www.re-fer.eu/. Accessed Aug 2020

  32. 32.

    Czaderski C, Shahverdi M, Brönnimann R, Leinenbach C, Motavalli M (2014) Feasibility of iron-based shape memory alloy strips for prestressed strengthening of concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 56:94–105

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Soroushian P, Ostowari K, Nossoni A, Chowdhury H (2001) Bond-slip behavior of superelastic shape memory alloys for near-surface-mounted strengthening applications. Transp Res Rec 1770(1):20–26

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Michels J, Shahverdi M, Czaderski C (2017) Flexural strengthening of structural concrete with iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Struct Concr 19(3):876–891

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rojob H, El-Hacha R (2017) Self-prestressing using Fe-SMA for flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Struct J 114(2):523–532

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rojob H, El-Hacha R (2018) Performance of RC beams strengthened with self-prestressed Fe-SMA bars exposed to freeze-thaw cycles and sustained load. Eng Struct 169:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shahverdi M, Czaderski C, Motavalli M (2016) Iron-based shape memory alloys for prestressed near-surface mounted strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. Constr Build Mater 112:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shahverdi M, Czaderski C, Annen P, Motavalli M (2016) Strengthening of RC beams by iron-based shape memory alloy bars embedded in a shotcrete layer. Eng Struct 117:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2003) Bond and development of straight reinforcing bars in tension. (ACI-408R-03) ACI Committee 408, Farmington Hills, MI

  40. 40.

    fib (2000) Bond of reinforcement in concrete. Bulletin N.10, State-of-Art Report, T.G. “Bond Models”, Convener Ralejs Tepfers

  41. 41.

    Diederichs U, Schneider U (1981) Bond strength at high temperatures. Mag Concr Res 33(115):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hertz K (1982) The anchorage capacity of reinforcing bars at normal and high temperatures. Mag Concr Res 34(121):213–220

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Morley PD, Royles R (1983) Response of the bond in reinforced concrete to high temperatures. Mag Concr Res 35(123):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lublóy E, Balázs GL (2012) Influence of high temperatures on bond. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on bond in concrete—BIC, Brescia (Italy)

  45. 45.

    RILEM (1985) Properties of materials at high temperatures: concrete. In: Schneider U (ed), publ. by the Dept. of Civil Eng. of the University of Kassel, Kassel (Germany)

  46. 46.

    Sharma A, Bošnjak J, Bessert S (2019) Experimental investigations on residual bond performance in concrete subjected to elevated temperature. Eng Struct 187:384–395

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Daghash SM, Sherif MM, Ozbulut OE (2015) Experimental investigation of bond in concrete members reinforced with shape memory alloy bars. In: Active and passive smart structures and integrated systems

  48. 48.

    Billah A, Alam M (2016) Bond behavior of smooth and sand-coated shape memory alloy (SMA) rebar in concrete. Structures, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 186–195

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Daghash S, Ozbulut O (2017) Repair and strengthening of concrete structures through application of corrective posttensioning forces with shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 26:035020

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hong K, Lee S (2018) Evaluation of Fe-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) as strengthening material for reinforced concrete structures. Appl Sci 8(5):730

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Schranz B, Shahverdi M, Czaderski C (2019) Bond behaviour of ribbed near-surface mounted iron-based shape memory alloy bars: experimental investigation. In: SMAR 2019—fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, pp 1–8

  52. 52.

    Schranz B, Shahverdi M, Vogel T, Czaderski C (2020) Bond behaviour of ribbed near-surface-mounted iron-based shape memory alloy bars with short bond lengths. Mater Des 191:108647

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lee WJ, Weber B, Feltrin G, Czaderski C, Motavalli M, Leinenbach C (2013) Phase transformation behavior under uniaxial deformation of an Fe-Mn-Si-Cr-Ni-VC shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 581:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    BS 6744:2001 + A2:2009, (2009) Stainless steel bars for the reinforcement of and use in concrete—requirements and test methods. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    ASTM A615/A615M-18 (2018) Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 19428-2959

  56. 56.

    Rilem/CEB/FIP (1978) Bond test for reinforcing steel 2: pull-out test. Recommendation RC6. Rilem, Bagneux, France

  57. 57.

    fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete) (2013) Model code for concrete structures 2010. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Murcia-Delso J, Shing PB (2015) Bond-slip model for detailed finite-element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. J Struct Eng 141(4):04014125

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Murcia-Delso J, Fawaz G (2019) Analytical model for bar slip and pullout capacity of straight bars. ACI Struct J 116(5):137–149

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to re-fer AG for providing the Fe-SMA bars used in this study. The authors are also grateful to the technical staff at the Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory and to the student Aman Meerza for their assistance during the experimental program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Murcia-Delso.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fawaz, G., Murcia-Delso, J. Bond behavior of iron-based shape memory alloy reinforcing bars embedded in concrete. Mater Struct 53, 114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01548-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Iron-based shape memory alloys (Fe-SMA)
  • Reinforcing bar
  • Bond strength
  • Bond-slip behavior
  • Activation temperature
  • Transfer length