Skip to main content

Nanoscale viscoelastic characterization of asphalt binders using the AFM-nDMA test

Materials and Structures volume 53, Article number: 110 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

This paper portrays the first set of results of nanoscale viscoelastic (VE) properties of asphalt binders obtained using the recently developed Atomic Force Microscopy-Nanoscale Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (AFM-nDMA) testing mode. To this end, nanoscale frequency sweeps were carried out on eight different asphalt samples including an unmodified asphalt binder and seven Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) modified binders. The nDMA testing mode was successful in obtaining the nanoscale VE properties of asphalt binder and constructing nanoscale master curves. This method was also used successfully to distinguish among the different constituents of heterogeneous binder samples based on their dynamic viscoelastic properties. Furthermore, bulk-scale frequency sweeps tests were performed using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) in order to compare the nanoscale properties with the bulk properties. There were major differences between the bulk and nanoscale test results. For example, nanoscale dynamic modulus values were higher than their bulk-scale counterparts and the difference increased with an increase in temperature and/or decrease in frequency. On the other hand, the nanoscale phase angle values were less than their bulk counterparts and the difference increased with an increase in frequency. These findings indicate that asphalt binders exhibit stiffer and more elastic behavior at the nanoscale than at the bulk scale. There are distinct differences in the shapes of the master modulus and phase angle curves obtained from the nano and bulk measurements. This paper includes testing guidelines and procedures that would be useful for future experimental investigations of nano VE properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Adopted from [27]. (Color figure online)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Hossain MI, Faisal HM, Tarefder RA (2016) Determining effects of moisture in mastic materials using nanoindentation. Mater Struct 49(3):1079–1092

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eberhardsteiner L, Füssl J, Hofko B, Handle F, Hospodka M, Blab R, Grothe H (2015) Influence of asphaltene content on mechanical bitumen behavior: experimental investigation and micromechanical modeling. Mater Struct 48(10):3099–3112

    Google Scholar 

  3. Odegard G, Gates T, Herring H (2005) Characterization of viscoelastic properties of polymeric materials through nanoindentation. Exp Mech 45(2):130–136

    Google Scholar 

  4. Veytskin Y, Bobko C, Castorena C (2016) Nanoindentation investigation of asphalt binder and mastic viscoelasticity. Int J Pavement Eng 17(4):363–376

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jäger A, Lackner R, Eberhardsteiner J (2007) Identification of viscoelastic properties by means of nanoindentation taking the real tip geometry into account. Meccanica 42(3):293–306

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarefder RA, Faisal HM (2013) Modeling nanoindentation creep behavior of asphalt binder. Adv Civ Eng Mater 2(1):418–440

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faisal HM, Khan ZH, Tarefder R (2016) Modeling nanoscale rheological and mechanical properties of thin film asphalt binder. In: ASME 2016 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection

  8. Jäger A, Lackner R, Stangl K (2007) Microscale characterization of bitumen–back-analysis of viscoelastic properties by means of nanoindentation. Int J Mater Res 98(5):404–413

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veytskin Y, Bobko C, Castorena C (2016) Nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy investigations of asphalt binder and mastic. J Mater Civ Eng 28(6):04016019

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee E (1955) Stress analysis in visco-elastic bodies. Q Appl Math 13(2):183–190

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee E, Radok JRM (1960) The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. JAM 27(3):438–444

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yablon DG, Grabowski J, Chakraborty I (2014) Measuring the loss tangent of polymer materials with atomic force microscopy based methods. Meas Sci Technol 25(5):055402

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galuska A, Poulter R, McElrath K (1997) Force modulation AFM of elastomer blends: morphology, fillers and cross-linking. Surf Interface Anal 25(6):418–429

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rajabifar B, Jadhav JM, Kiracofe D, Meyers GF, Raman A (2018) Dynamic AFM on viscoelastic polymer samples with surface forces. Macromolecules 51(23):9649–9661

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen HK, Liang X, Ito M, Nakajima K (2018) Direct mapping of nanoscale viscoelastic dynamics at nanofiller/polymer interfaces. Macromolecules 51(15):6085–6091

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benaglia S, Amo CA, Garcia R (2019) Fast, quantitative and high resolution mapping of viscoelastic properties with bimodal AFM. Nanoscale 11(32):15289–15297

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen HK, Ito M, Nakajima K (2016) Elastic and viscoelastic characterization of inhomogeneous polymers by bimodal atomic force microscopy. Jpn J Appl Phys 55(8S1):08NB06

    Google Scholar 

  18. Igarashi T, Fujinami S, Nishi T, Asao N, Nakajima Ken (2013) Nanorheological mapping of rubbers by atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 46(5):1916–1922

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yablon DG, Gannepalli A, Proksch R, Killgore J, Hurley DC, Grabowski J, Tsou AH (2012) Quantitative viscoelastic mapping of polyolefin blends with contact resonance atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 45(10):4363–4370

    Google Scholar 

  20. Killgore JP, Yablon D, Tsou A, Gannepalli A, Yuya P, Turner JA, Proksch R, Hurley D (2011) Viscoelastic property mapping with contact resonance force microscopy. Langmuir 27(23):13983–13987

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hurley DC, Campbell SE, Killgore JP, Cox LM, Ding Y (2013) Measurement of viscoelastic loss tangent with contact resonance modes of atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 46(23):9396–9402

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou X, Fu J, Miao H, Li F (2014) Contact resonance force microscopy with higher-eigenmode for nanoscale viscoelasticity measurements. J Appl Phys 116(3):034310

    Google Scholar 

  23. Overney R, Meyer E, Frommer J, Güntherodt H-J, Fujihira M, Takano H, Gotoh Y (1994) Force microscopy study of friction and elastic compliance of phase-separated organic thin films. Langmuir 10(4):1281–1286

    Google Scholar 

  24. Overney R, Meyer E, Frommer J, Brodbeck D, Lüthi R, Howald L, Giintherodt H-J, Fujihira M, Takano H, Gotoh Y (1992) Friction measurements on phase-separated thin films with a modified atomic force microscope. Nature 359(6391):133–135

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kajiyama T, Tanaka K, Takahara A (1997) Surface molecular motion of the monodisperse polystyrene films. Macromolecules 30(2):280–285

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolluru PV, Eaton MD, Collinson DW, Cheng X, Delgado DE, Shull KR, Brinson LC (2018) AFM-based dynamic scanning indentation (DSI) method for fast, high-resolution spatial mapping of local viscoelastic properties in soft materials. Macromolecules 51(21):8964–8978

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pittenger B, Osechinskiy S, Yablon D (2019) Measuring nanoscale viscoelastic properties with AFM-based nanoscale DMA. Bruker Appl Note. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32306.96962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Moraes M, Pereira R, Simão R, Leite L (2010) High temperature AFM study of CAP 30/45 pen grade bitumen. J Microsc 239(1):46–53

    Google Scholar 

  29. Allen RG, Little DN, Bhasin A (2012) Structural characterization of micromechanical properties in asphalt using atomic force microscopy. J Mater Civ Eng 24(10):1317–1327

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cavalli MC, Mazza E, Zaumanis M, Poulikakos LD (2019) Surface nanomechanical properties of bio-modified reclaimed asphalt binder. Road Mater Pavement Des. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1691042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rashid F, Hossain Z, Bhasin A (2019) Nanomechanistic properties of reclaimed asphalt pavement modified asphalt binders using an atomic force microscope. Int J Pavement Eng 20(3):357–365

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jahangir R, Little D, Bhasin A (2015) Evolution of asphalt binder microstructure due to tensile loading determined using AFM and image analysis techniques. Int J Pavement Eng 16(4):337–349

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cavalli M, Partl M, Poulikakos L (2019) Effect of ageing on the microstructure of reclaimed asphalt binder with bio-based rejuvenators. Road Mater Pavement Des 20:1683–1694

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lyne ÅL, Wallqvist V, Birgisson B (2013) Adhesive surface characteristics of bitumen binders investigated by atomic force microscopy. Fuel 113:248–256

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pittenger B, Osechinskiy S, Yablon D, Mueller T (2019) Nanoscale DMA with the atomic force microscope: a new method for measuring viscoelastic properties of nanostructured polymer materials. JOM 71(10):3390–3398

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rehman A (2020) Microstructure and performance analysis of polyethylene-modified asphalt. Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nahar S, Schmets A, Schitter G, Scarpas A (2014) Quantitative nanomechanical property mapping of bitumen micro-phases by peak-force atomic force microscopy. In: 12th ISAP Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Raleigh, NC, USA

  38. Tarefder RA, Zaman AM (2009) Nanoscale evaluation of moisture damage in polymer modified asphalts. J Mater Civ Eng 22(7):714–725

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gudmarsson A, Ryden N, Di Benedetto H, Sauzéat C (2015) Complex modulus and complex Poisson’s ratio from cyclic and dynamic modal testing of asphalt concrete. Constr Build Mater 88:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dokukin ME, Sokolov I (2012) On the measurements of rigidity modulus of soft materials in nanoindentation experiments at small depth. Macromolecules 45(10):4277–4288

    Google Scholar 

  41. Allen RG, Little DN, Bhasin A, Lytton RL (2013) Identification of the composite relaxation modulus of asphalt binder using AFM nanoindentation. J Mater Civ Eng 25(4):530–539

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang G, Wang B, Lu H (2004) Measurements of viscoelastic functions of polymers in the frequency-domain using nanoindentation. Mech Time Depend Mater 8(4):345–364

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jones CA (2011) Contact mechanics based mechanical characterization of Portland cement paste. Texas A&M University, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  44. White C, Drzal P, VanLandingham M (2004) Viscoelastic characterization of polymers using dynamic instrumented indentation. In: MRS online proceedings library archive 841

  45. Kringos N (2009) A finite element based chemo-mechanics model to simulate healing of bituminous materials. In: International workshop chemo mechanics of bituminous materials, Delft, The Netherlands, 9–11 June 2009, pp 69–75

  46. Booshehrian A, Mogawer WS, Bonaquist R (2013) How to construct an asphalt binder master curve and assess the degree of blending between RAP and virgin binders. J Mater Civ Eng 25(12):1813–1821

    Google Scholar 

  47. ABATECH (2012) RHEA, 1st edn, Philadelphia, USA

  48. Gordon GV, Shaw MT (1994) Computer programs für rheologists. Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF): NPRP11S-1128-170041. All the statements are those of the authors. The authors also acknowledge the co-funding of Qatar Petrochemical Company. The authors benefited from the insightful discussion with and support of Mr. Hartmut Stadler from Bruker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Mohammad Fuad Aljarrah

  2. Mechanical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar

    Eyad Masad

Authors
  1. Mohammad Fuad Aljarrah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eyad Masad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Fuad Aljarrah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aljarrah, M.F., Masad, E. Nanoscale viscoelastic characterization of asphalt binders using the AFM-nDMA test. Mater Struct 53, 110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01543-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01543-3

Keywords

  • nDMA
  • AFM
  • Viscoelasticity
  • Nanoscale
  • Asphalt binder
  • LDPE