Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Possibility of using different types of Egyptian serpentine as fine and coarse aggregates for concrete production

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work is the first attempt to study the possibility of incorporating three different types of Egyptian serpentine aggregates (antigorite, lizardite and chrysotile) with different serpentinization grades as fine and coarse aggregates for normal concrete production. The results of physical and mechanical tests for each type of aggregate were compared to the others. In addition, the effect of serpentinization grade on their mineralogical composition, physico-mechanical and morphological properties of was evaluated and compared. The results were analyzed by using sophisticated tools such as X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetry/differential thermogravimetry and scanning electron microscopy. The results revealed that the physical, mechanical and microstructural properties of serpentine-based concretes were negatively influenced by the progress of serpentinization and deformation processes. The antigorite aggregate showed the lowest serpentinization grade compared to the others (i.e. lizardite and chrysotile). Thus, the antigorite-based concrete revealed better physical and mechanical properties as well as a condensed interfacial transition zone than those of lizardite- and chrysotile-based. Therefore, the results of this study indicated that antigorite is the most appropriate serpentine aggregate to be used in normal concrete production, however, more tests on the durability of such concrete are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petrounias P, Giannakopoulou P, Rogkala A et al (2018) The impact of secondary phyllosilicate minerals on the engineering properties of various igneous aggregates from Greece. Minerals 8:329

    Google Scholar 

  2. Navarro R, Pereira D, Gimeno A et al (2015) Characterization of the natural variability of Macael Serpentinite (Verde Macael) (Almería, South of Spain) for their appropriate use in the building industry. Springer, Cham, pp 209–212

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navarro R, Pereira D, Gimeno A et al (2018) Influence of natural carbonation process in serpentinites used as construction and building materials. Constr Build Mater 170:537–546

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demie S, Nuruddin MF, Shafiq N (2013) Effects of micro-structure characteristics of interfacial transition zone on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 41:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao Y, De Schutter G, Ye G et al (2014) The ITZ microstructure, thickness and porosity in blended cementitious composite: effects of curing age, water to binder ratio and aggregate content. Compos B Eng 60:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu R, Xiao H, Liu J et al (2019) Improving the microstructure of ITZ and reducing the permeability of concrete with various water/cement ratios using nano-silica. JMatS 54:444–456

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vargas P, Restrepo-Baena O, Tobón JI (2017) Microstructural analysis of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) and its impact on the compressive strength of lightweight concretes. Constr Build Mater 137:381–389

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neville AM, Brooks JJ (2010) Concrete technology. Pearson Education Limited, England

    Google Scholar 

  9. ACI Committee E701 (2007) Aggregates for concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mével C (2003) Serpentinization of abyssal peridotites at mid-ocean ridges. C R Geosci 335:825–852

    Google Scholar 

  11. Surour AA (2017) Chemistry of serpentine “polymorphs” in the Pan-African serpentinites from the Eastern Desert of Egypt, with an emphasis on the effect of superimposed thermal metamorphism. Miner Petrol 111:99–119

    Google Scholar 

  12. RaM A, Pitcairn IK, Maurice AE et al (2020) Petrology and geochemistry of ophiolitic ultramafic rocks and chromitites across the Eastern Desert of Egypt: insights into the composition and nature of a Neoproterozoic mantle and implication for the evolution of SSZ system. Precambrian Res 337:105565

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hirth G, Guillot S (2013) Rheology and tectonic significance of serpentinite. Elements 9:107–113

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira D, Blanco J, Peinado M (2012) Study on serpentinites and the consequence of the misuse of natural stone in buildings for construction. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1563–1567

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kansouh WA (2012) Radiation distribution through serpentine concrete using local materials and its application as a reactor biological shield. Ann Nucl Energy 47:258–263

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharifi S, Bagheri R, Shirmardi SP (2013) Comparison of shielding properties for ordinary, barite, serpentine and steel–magnetite concretes using MCNP-4C code and available experimental results. Ann Nucl Energy 53:529–534

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ouda AS (2015) Development of high-performance heavy density concrete using different aggregates for gamma-ray shielding. Prog Nucl Energy 79:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tekin HO, Sayyed MI, SaM I (2018) Gamma radiation shielding properties of the hematite-serpentine concrete blended with WO3 and Bi2O3 micro and nano particles using MCNPX code. Radiat Phys Chem 150:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  19. Masoud MA, Kansouh WA, Shahien MG et al (2020) An experimental investigation on the effects of barite/hematite on the radiation shielding properties of serpentine concretes. Prog Nucl Energy 120:103220

    Google Scholar 

  20. ES 4756–1 (2009) Cement part: (1) composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM E1621 (2013) Standard guide for elemental analysis by wavelength dispersive X-Ray fluorescence spectrometry. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  22. ASTM D7348 (2013) Standard test methods for loss on ignition (LOI) of solid combustion residues. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hong L, Gu X, Lin F (2014) Influence of aggregate surface roughness on mechanical properties of interface and concrete. Constr Build Mater 65:338–349

    Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM C29, C29M (2009) Standard test method for bulk density (“unit weight”) and voids in aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM C127 (2015) Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM C128 (2015) Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  27. BS 812–112 (1990) Method for determination of aggregate impact value (AIV). British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. BS 812–110 (1990) Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. ASTM C136 (2006) Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  30. ACI 211.1. 1-91 (2009) Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight and mass concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  31. Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete. Pearson Education Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. ACI Committee 211R-96 (1991) Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight and mass concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM C192, C192M (2016) Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  34. BS EN 12390-3 (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM C496–04 (2004) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  36. Elsharief A, Cohen MD, Olek J (2003) Influence of aggregate size, water cement ratio and age on the microstructure of the interfacial transition zone. Cem Concr Res 33:1837–1849

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hussin A, Poole C (2011) Petrography evidence of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in the normal strength concrete containing granitic and limestone aggregates. Constr Build Mater 25:2298–2303

    Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM C642 (2006) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yacoub A, Djerbi A, Fen-Chong T (2019) The effect of the drying temperature on water porosity and gas permeability of recycled sand mortar. Constr Build Mater 214:677–684

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen X, Wu S, Zhou J (2013) Influence of porosity on compressive and tensile strength of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 40:869–874

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao H, Xiao Q, Huang D et al (2014) Influence of pore structure on compressive strength of cement mortar. Sci World J 2014:12

    Google Scholar 

  42. Esen Y, Doğan ZM (2017) Evaluation of physical and mechanical characteristics of siderite concrete to be used as heavy-weight concrete. Cem Concr Compos 82:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moody JB (1976) Serpentinization: a review. Lithos 9:125–138

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Power IM, Wilson SA, Dipple GM (2013) Serpentinite carbonation for CO2 sequestration. Elements 9:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  45. Andreani M, Muñoz M, Marcaillou C et al (2013) μXANES study of iron redox state in serpentine during oceanic serpentinization. Lithos 178:70–83

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gahlan HA, Arai S, Almadani SA (2015) Petrogenesis of carbonated meta-ultramafic lenses from the Neoproterozoic Heiani ophiolite, South Eastern Desert, Egypt: a natural analogue to CO2 sequestration. J Afr Earth Sci 102:102–115

    Google Scholar 

  47. Khedr MZ, Arai S (2018) Composite origin of magnetite deposits hosted in Oman peridotites: evidence for iron mobility during serpentinization. Ore Geol Rev 101:180–198

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hossain KMA, Lachemi M (2006) Performance of volcanic ash and pumice based blended cement concrete in mixed sulfate environment. Cem Concr Res 36:1123–1133

    Google Scholar 

  49. Evans BW, Hattori K, Baronnet A (2013) Serpentinite: what, why, where? Elements 9:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rosing MT (1989) Metasomatic alteration of ultramafic rocks. In: Bridgwater D (ed) Fluid movements—element transport and the composition of the deep crust. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 187–202

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ingham J (2010) Geomaterials under the microscope: a colour guide. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  52. Petrounias P, Giannakopoulou P, Rogkala A et al (2018) The effect of petrographic characteristics and physico-mechanical properties of aggregates on the quality of concrete. Minerals 8:577

    Google Scholar 

  53. Palassi M, Danesh A (2016) Relationships between abrasion/degradation of aggregate evaluated from various tests and the effect of saturation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2937–2943

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chen X, Zhou J, Yan Y (2014) Hydration of ultrafine and ordinary Portland cement at early ages. KSCE J Civ Eng 18:1720–1725

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kurdowski W, Nocuń-Wczelik W (1983) The tricalcium silicate hydration in the presence of active silica. Cem Concr Res 13:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ruan S, Liu J, Yang E-H et al (2017) Performance and microstructure of calcined dolomite and reactive magnesia-based concrete samples. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04017236

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zajac M, Durdzinski P, Stabler C et al (2018) Influence of calcium and magnesium carbonates on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of metakaolin containing composite cements. Cem Concr Res 106:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  58. Djerbi A (2018) Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on the new interfacial transition zone concrete. Constr Build Mater 190:1023–1033

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mather B (2001) Self-curing concrete, why not? Concr Int 23:46–47

    Google Scholar 

  60. Szybilski M, Nocuń-Wczelik W (2015) The effect of dolomite additive on cement hydration. Proc Eng 108:193–198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Support and Finance Office, Beni-Suef University (Grant YRP21). The authors are beholden to Dr. Ahmed S. Abu Sharib and Mr. Mohamed Hamdy for their great helping in the fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Mineralogy and Water Research Lab, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, 62521, Egypt

    M. A. Masoud, M. G. Shahien & A. M. Zayed

  2. Building Materials Research and Quality Control Institute, Housing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Cairo, Egypt

    Alaa M. Rashad

  3. Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Alaa M. Rashad

  4. Hot Laboratory Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, 13759, Egypt

    K. Sakr

Authors
  1. M. A. Masoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alaa M. Rashad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Sakr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. G. Shahien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. M. Zayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alaa M. Rashad or A. M. Zayed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masoud, M.A., Rashad, A.M., Sakr, K. et al. Possibility of using different types of Egyptian serpentine as fine and coarse aggregates for concrete production. Mater Struct 53, 87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01525-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01525-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation