Skip to main content
Log in

Damage assessment of the in-service brick masonry structure using acoustic emission technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the current researches on masonry damage assessment are qualitative rather than quantitative analysis. In this work, two acoustic emission (AE) rate process mathematical models were used to analyze the AE data during the in situ uniaxial compression test. The results showed that there was a linear correlation between AE cumulative events and the damage parameter, and the mathematical model proposed by S. T. Dai was suitable for analyzing the microcrack evolution of brick masonry material. Furthermore, the comparison of the fourth-order polynomial function and the Dai model with respect to the proportional coefficient k further demonstrated the applicability of the Dai model in damage assessment of in-service brick masonry structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livitsanos G, Shetty N, Hündgen D, Verstrynge E, Wevers M, Van Hemelrijck D, Aggelis DG (2018) Acoustic emission characteristics of fracture modes in masonry materials. Constr Build Mater 162:914–922

    Google Scholar 

  2. Han Q, Xu J, Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G (2015) Localization of acoustic emission sources in structural health monitoring of masonry bridge. Struct Control Health 22:314–329

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bassoli E, Vincenzi L, D’Altri AM, Miranda SD, Castellazzi G (2018) Ambient vibration-based finite element model updating of an earthquake-damaged masonry tower. Struct Control Health 25(5):e2150

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andreev K, Shetty N, Verstrynge E (2018) Acoustic emission based damage limits and their correlation with fatigue resistance of refractory masonry. Constr Build Mater 165:639–646

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bru D, Reynau R, Baeza FJ, Ivorra S (2018) Structural damage evaluation of industrial masonry chimneys. Mater Struct 51(1):34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G, Lozano-Ramírez NE, Carpinteri A (2019) Structural monitoring and assessment of an ancient masonry tower. Eng Fract Mech 210:429–443

    Google Scholar 

  7. Livitsanos G, Shetty N, Verstrynge E, Wevers M, Van Hemelrijck D, Aggelis DG (2019) Shear failure characterization in masonry components made with different mortars based on combined NDT methods. Constr Build Mater 220:690–700

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li SL, Wu YQ, Shi HS (2019) A novel acoustic emission monitoring method of cross-section precise localization of defects and wire breaking of parallel wire bundle. Struct Control Health 26:e2334

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma YF, Li SL, Wu YQ, Wang DW, Liu MY (2019) Acoustic emission testing method for the sleeve grouting compactness of fabricated structure. Constr Build Mater 221:800–810

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li SL, Wu GM, Shi HS (2019) Acoustic emission characteristics of semi-rigid bases with three moisture conditions during bending tests. Road Mater Pavement 20:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li SL, Wu GM, Wu H (2016) Study on acoustic emission characteristics of a semirigid base of dense skeleton type during complete uniaxial compression tests. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geng JS, Sun Q, Zhang YC, Cao LW, Zhang WQ (2017) Studying the dynamic damage failure of concrete based on acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 149:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodríguez P, Celestino TB (2019) Application of acoustic emission monitoring and signal analysis to the qualitative and quantitative characterization of the fracturing process in rocks. Eng Fract Mech 210:54–69

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu PY, Li SL, Jiang N, Yan YD (2019) Investigation of the impressed current cathodic protection method for the cable parallel wires in the rainwater electrolyte based on acoustic emission method. Constr Build Mater 229:116918

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu YQ, Li SL, Wang DW (2019) Characteristic analysis of acoustic emission signals of masonry specimens under uniaxial compression test. Constr Build Mater 196:637–648

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antonaci P, Bocca P, Masera D (2012) Fatigue crack propagation monitoring by acoustic emission signal analysis. Eng Fract Mech 81:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Santis S, Tomor AK (2013) Laboratory and field studies on the use of acoustic emission for masonry bridges. Ndt&E Int 55:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vanniamparambil PA, Bolhassani M, Carmi R, Khan F, Bartoli I, Moon FL, Hamid A, Kontsos A (2014) A data fusion approach for progressive damage quantification in reinforced concrete masonry walls. Smart Mater Struct 23:15007–15017

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shetty N, Livitsanos G, Van Roy N, Aggelis DG, Van Hemelrijck D, Wevers M, Verstrynge E (2019) Quantification of progressive structural integrity loss in masonry with acoustic emission-based damage classification. Constr Build Mater 194:192–204

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tomor A, Verstrynge E (2013) A joint fatigue-creep deterioration model for masonry with acoustic emission based damage assessment. Constr Build Mater 43:575–588

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verstrynge E, Schueremans L, Van Gemert D (2010) Predicting the time to failure in heavily loaded masonry specimens with the acoustic emission technique. Adv Mater Res 133–134:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verstrynge E, Schueremans L, Van Gemert D, Wevers M (2009) Monitoring and predicting masonry’s creep failure with the acoustic emission technique. Ndt&E Int 42:518–523

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ortiz M (1988) Microcrack coalescence and macroscopic crack growth initiation in brittle solids. Int J Solids Struct 24:231–250

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ohtsu M (2015) Acoustic emission and related non-destructive evaluation techniques in the fracture mechanics of concrete. Fundam Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-327-0.18001-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Hu H, Lu G, Chen S, Liu S, Wang Y (2016) Effects of specimen height on the acoustic emission rate value ‘a’ for cement mortar. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed 31:843–850

    Google Scholar 

  26. Su HZ, Tong JJ, Hu J, Wen ZP (2013) Experimental study on AE behavior of hydraulic concrete under compression. Meccanica 48:427–439

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ohtsu M, Watanabe H (2001) Quantitative damage estimation of concrete by acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 15:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ohtsu M, Ichinose M, Watanabe H (2003) Damage estimation of concrete by AE rate process analysis. J Acoust Emiss 20:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ohtsu M, Suzuki T (2004) Quantitative damage evaluation of concrete core based on AE rate-process analysis. J Acoust Emiss 22:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alver N, Karcili M, Ercan E, Kauasaki Y, Ohtsu M (2014) Damage evaluation in concrete structures due to earthquake by AE rate-process analysis. In: Proceedings of 31st conference on European Working Group on AE, 9/3-5, Dresden

  31. Wang Y, Hu HX, Wang N, Yan C, Chen SJ, Zhou L (2017) Experimental study of effects of water–cement ratio on the acoustic emission rate “a” values in concrete. Russ J Nondestruct 53:620–635

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dai ST, Labuz JF (1997) Damage and failure analysis of brittle materials by acoustic emission. J Mater Civ Eng 9:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  33. Karcili M, Alver N, Ohtsu M (2016) Application of AE rate-process analysis to damaged concrete structures due to earthquake. Mater Struct 49:2171–2178

    Google Scholar 

  34. Suzuki T, Ogata H, Takada R, Aoki M, Ohtsu M (2010) Use of acoustic emission and X-ray computed tomography for damage evaluation of freeze-thawed concrete. Constr Build Mater 24:2347–2352

    Google Scholar 

  35. Birgul R, Al-Shammari FMW, Yaman IO, Aktan MH (2004) Acoustic emission evaluation of concrete culverts. Res Nondestruct Eval 15:191–208

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ishibashi A, Matsuyama K, Alver N, Suzuki T, Ohtsu M (2016) Round-robin tests on damage evaluation of concrete based on the concept of acoustic emission rates. Mater Struct 49:2627–2635

    Google Scholar 

  37. Suzuki T, Ohtsu M (2014) Damage estimation of concrete canal due to earthquake effects by acoustic emission method. Constr Build Mater 67:186–191

    Google Scholar 

  38. Uranjek M, Bokan-Bosiljkov V (2015) Influence of freeze-thaw cycles on mechanical properties of historical brick masonry. Constr Build Mater 84:416–428

    Google Scholar 

  39. Suzuki T, Ohtsu M, Shigeishi M (2007) Relative damage evaluation of concrete in a road bridge by AE rate-process analysis. Mater Struct 40:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  40. Suzuki T, Ohtsu M (2004) Quantitative damage evaluation of structural concrete by a compression test based on AE rate process analysis. Constr Build Mater 18:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  41. GB 50292-2015 (2015) Standard for appraisal of reliability of civil buildings

  42. GB/T 50315-2011 (2011) Technical standard for site testing of masonry engineering

  43. Noorsuhada MN (2016) An overview on fatigue damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission technique. Constr Build Mater 112:424–439

    Google Scholar 

  44. Melbourne C, Tomor AK (2006) Application of acoustic emission for masonry arch bridges. Strain 42:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  45. Feng L, Shu Lin L, Yun LX (2010) Relationship between acoustic emission parameter and mechanics parameters damage degree of concrete material. J Xiamen Univ 49:526–530

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu YQ, Li SL, Wang DW, Zhao GH (2019) Damage monitoring of masonry structure under in situ uniaxial compression test using acoustic emission parameters. Constr Build Mater 215:812–822

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu L, Zong ZH, Li MH (2018) Numerical study of damage modes and assessment of circular rc pier under noncontact explosions. J Bridge Eng 23:04018061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mojškerc B, Kek T, Grum J (2019) Experimental characterization of quenching bath contamination using acoustic emission. J Nondestruct Eval 38(3):69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0608-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778587, 51808510), Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Henan Province (192102310514), Supported by Foundation for University Young Key Teacher by Henan Province (2017GGJS005), Outstanding Young Talent Research Fund of Zhengzhou University (1421322059) and Science and technology planning project of Transportation in Henan Province (2016Y2-2, 2018J3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengli Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Gu, S., Zhao, G. et al. Damage assessment of the in-service brick masonry structure using acoustic emission technique. Mater Struct 53, 41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01475-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01475-y

Keywords

Navigation