Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing abrasion performance of self-consolidating concrete containing synthetic fibers using acoustic emission analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key objective of this investigation was to evaluate the abrasion resistance of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) with and without synthetic fibers (SynFs). The abrasion resistance of normal concrete was also investigated in this study for comparison. The abrasion test was performed on concrete specimens according to the rotating-cutter method along with continuous monitoring of acoustic emission (AE) using attached AE sensors. The effects of changing concrete type and incorporating various types (flexible and semi-rigid) and lengths of SynFs on the abrasion behaviour were investigated with the aid of AE analysis. AE signal characteristics such as amplitude, signal strength, number of hits, and duration were gathered during testing. Furthermore, the collected AE data was used to complete b-value analysis as well as intensity analysis resulting in three additional parameters: b-value, severity (Sr), and historic index (H(t)). The results showed that the AE parameters were directly correlated with the abrasion damage in all tested mixtures. Adding SynFs to all SCC mixtures enhanced their abrasion resistance. The flexible fibers variety exhibited better abrasion performance on average than the semi-rigid fibers. Meanwhile, longer fibers showed lower abrasion resistance than the shorter ones with the same type. The results also indicated that AE intensity analysis was able to determine the ranges for H(t) and Sr that identify the extent of damage due to abrasion of SynF-reinforced SCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lachemi M, Hossain KMA, Lambros V, Bouzoubaâ N (2003) Development of cost-effective self-compacting concrete incorporating fly ash, slag cement, or viscosity-modifying admixtures. ACI Mater J 100:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ismail MK, Hassan AAA (2017) Impact resistance and mechanical properties of self-consolidating rubberized concrete reinforced with steel fibers. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04016193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolat H, Şimşek O, Çullua M, Durmuş G, Can Ö (2014) The effects of macro synthetic fiber reinforcement use on physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Compos Part B Eng 61:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yap SP, Bu CH, Alengaram UJ, Mo KH, Jumaat MZ (2014) Flexural toughness characteristics of steel–polypropylene hybrid fibre-reinforced oil palm shell concrete. Mater Des 57:652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabois TM, Cordeiro GC, Toledo Filho RD (2016) Fresh and hardened-state properties of self-compacting lightweight concrete reinforced with steel fibers. Constr Build Mater 104:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AbdelAleem BH, Ismail MK, Hassan AAA (2017) Properties of self-consolidating rubberised concrete reinforced with synthetic fibres. Mag Concr Res 69:526–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott BD, Safiuddin M (2015) Abrasion resistance of concrete—design, construction and case study. Concr Res Lett 6:136–148

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM (2012) Standard test method for abrasion resistance of horizontal concrete surfaces. ASTM C779. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM (2012) Standard test method for abrasion resistance of concrete by sandblasting. ASTM C418. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  10. ASTM (2012) Standard test method for abrasion resistance of concrete or mortar surfaces by the rotating-cutter method. ASTM C944. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghafoori N, Najimi M, Aqel MA (2014) Abrasion resistance of self-consolidating concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 26:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziehl PH, Galati N, Nanni A, Tumialan JG (2008) In-situ evaluation of two concrete slab systems. II: evaluation criteria and outcomes. J Perform Constr Facil 22:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaki A, Chai HK, Aggelis DG, Alver N (2015) Non-destructive evaluation for corrosion monitoring in concrete: a review and capability of acoustic emission technique. Sensors 15:19069–19101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou X, Yang Y, Li X, Zhao G (2016) Acoustic emission characterization of the fracture process in steel fiber reinforced concrete. Comput Concr 18:923–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdelrahman M, ElBatanouny MK, Ziehl P, Fasl J, Larosche CJ, Fraczek J (2015) Classification of alkali–silica reaction damage using acoustic emission: a proof-of-concept study. Constr Build Mater 95:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anay R, Cortez TM, Jáuregui DV, ElBatanouny MK, Ziehl P (2016) On-site acoustic-emission monitoring for assessment of a prestressed concrete double-tee-beam bridge without plans. J Perform Constr Facil 30:04015062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salamone S, Veletzos MJ, Lanza di Scale F, Restrepo JI (2012) Detection of initial yield and onset of failure in bonded posttensioned concrete beams. J Bridge Eng 17:966–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM (2012) Standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM C150. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM (2009) Standard test method for slump flow of self-consolidating concrete. ASTM C1611. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM (2013) Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM C494. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM (2012) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mistras Group (2005) R6I-AST sensor. Physical Acoustics Corporation, Princeton Junction, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abouhussien AA, Hassan AAA (2017) Acoustic emission monitoring for bond integrity evaluation of reinforced concrete under pull-out tests. Adv Struct Eng 20:1390–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mistras Group (2007) PCI-2 based AE system user’s manual. Physical Acoustics Corporation, Princeton Junction, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ridgley KE, Abouhussien AA, Hassan AAA, Colbourne B (2017) Characterization of damage due to abrasion in SCC by acoustic emission analysis. Mag Concrete Res Published Online Ahead of Print: 1–31

  26. Abouhussien AA, Hassan AAA (2017) Application of acoustic emission monitoring for assessment of bond performance of corroded reinforced concrete beams. Struct Health Monit 16:732–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM (2014) Standard terminology for nondestructive examinations. ASTM E1316. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  28. Colombo IS, Main IG, Forde MC (2003) Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using ‘‘b-value’’ analysis of acoustic emission signals. J Mater Civ Eng 15:280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ohtsu M, Tomoda Y (2008) Phenomenological model of corrosion process in reinforced concrete identified by acoustic emission. ACI Mater J 105:194–199

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sagar RV, Prasad BKR (2013) Laboratory investigations on cracking in reinforced concrete beams using on-line acoustic emission monitoring technique. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ElBatanouny MK, Mangual J, Ziehl PH, Matta F (2014) Early corrosion detection in prestressed concrete girders using acoustic emission. J Mater Civ Eng 26:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li D, Chen Z, Feng Q, Wang Y (2015) Damage analysis of CFRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns by acoustic emission techniques. Smart Mater Struct 24:085017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vélez W, Matta F, Ziehl P (2015) Acoustic emission monitoring of early corrosion in prestressed concrete piles. Struct Contr Health Monit 22:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nair A, Cai CS (2010) Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: review and case studies. Eng Struct 32:1704–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Abdelrahman M, ElBatanouny MK, Ziehl PH (2014) Acoustic emission based damage assessment method for prestressed concrete structures: modified index of damage. Eng Struct 60:258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fowler T, Blessing J, Conlisk P (1989) New directions in testing. In: Ono K (ed) Proceedings, international conference of acoustic emission from composite materials. Acoustic Emission Working Group, Memphis, pp 16–27

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ridgley KE, Abouhussien AA, Hassan AAA, Colbourne B (2018) Evaluation of abrasion resistance of self-consolidating rubberized concrete by acoustic emission analysis. J Mater Civ Eng 30(8):04018196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Horszczaruk EK (2009) Hydro-abrasive erosion of high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Wear 267:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the NSERC CRD for sponsoring this work as a part of a large research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed A. Abouhussien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ridgley, K.E., Abouhussien, A.A., Hassan, A.A.A. et al. Assessing abrasion performance of self-consolidating concrete containing synthetic fibers using acoustic emission analysis. Mater Struct 51, 119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1247-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1247-3

Keywords

Navigation