Skip to main content
Log in

Use of clay-based construction and demolition waste as additions in the design of new low and very low heat of hydration cements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In light of the large amounts of cement used in plain concrete and given the exothermal reactions involved in its hydration, the control and assessment of heat of hydration are instrumental to prevent future shortcomings in structural durability. This article describes the design of new eco-efficient cements containing different percentages of fired clay-based construction and demolition waste (CC&DW). The new cements (CCDWC) were characterised for pozzolanicity and their heat of hydration was assessed based on a semi-adiabatic method described in European standards. The inclusion of CC&DW retarded the heating of mortar and lowered its maximum temperatures, more significantly with the increase of replacement ratios. The design of such CC&DW-bearing low and very low heat of hydration cements may well prompt the introduction of new applications of bulk cement or cement-high mixes, in which heat may have adverse effects on durability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springenschmid R (1991) Cracks in concrete caused by the heat of hydration. Zem Kalk Gips 3:132–138

    Google Scholar 

  2. Desmet B, Atitung KC, Sanchez MAA et al (2011) Monitoring the early-age hydration of self-compacting concrete using ultrasonic p-wave transmission and isothermal calorimetry. Mater Struct 44:1537–1558. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-011-9717-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. da Silva WRL, Šmilauer V, Štemberk P (2015) Upscaling semi-adiabatic measurements for simulating temperature evolution of mass concrete structures. Mater Struct 48:1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0213-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CEN-CENELEC (2011) EN 197-1. Cement Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. Brussels, Belgium

  5. CEN-CENELEC (2015) EN 14216. Cement: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for special cements with very low hydration heat. Brussels, Belgium

  6. Ballim Y, Graham PC (2009) The effects of supplementary cementing materials in modifying the heat of hydration of concrete. Mater Struct 42:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9425-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadri EH, Aggoun S, Schutter GD, Ezziane K (2010) Combined effect of chemical nature and fineness of mineral powders on Portland cement hydration. Mater Struct 43:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9519-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han J, Wang K, Wang Y, Shi J (2016) Study of aluminum sulfate and anhydrite on cement hydration process. Mater Struct 49:1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0561-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Medina C, Sáez del Bosque IF, Asensio E et al (2016) New additions for eco-efficient cement design. Impact on calorimetric behaviour and comparison of test methods. Mater Struct 49:4595–4607. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0809-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI, Cabrera J (2000) The effect that the pozzolanic reaction of metakaolin has on the heat evolution in metakaolin-cement mortars. Cem Concr Res 30:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00231-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadri E-H, Kenai S, Ezziane K et al (2011) Influence of metakaolin and silica fume on the heat of hydration and compressive strength development of mortar. Appl Clay Sci 53:704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez O, Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2008) Influence of the calcined paper sludge on the development of hydration heat in blended cement mortars. J Therm Anal Calorim 92:865–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8270-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sánchez de Rojas MI, Luxán MP, Frías M, García N (1993) The influence of different additions on portland cement hydration heat. Cem Concr Res 23:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(93)90134-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thongsanitgarn P, Wongkeo W, Chaipanich A, Poon CS (2014) Heat of hydration of Portland high-calcium fly ash cement incorporating limestone powder: Effect of limestone particle size. Constr Build Mater 66:410–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tydlitát V, Zákoutský J, Volfová P, Černý R (2012) Hydration heat development in blended cements containing fine-ground ceramics. Thermochim Acta 543:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asensio de Lucas E, Medina C, Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2016) Clay-based construction and demolition waste as a pozzolanic addition in blended cements. Effect on sulfate resistance. Constr Build Mater 127:950–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Asensio E, Medina C, Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2016) Characterization of ceramic-based construction and demolition waste: use as pozzolan in cements. J Am Ceram Soc 99:4121–4127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CEN-CENELEC (2011) EN 196-5. Method of testing cement. Part 5: Pozzolanicity test for pozzolanic cement. Brussels, Belgium

  19. CEN-CENELEC (2013) EN 450-1. Fly ashes for concrete. Part 1: Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria. Brussels, Belgium

  20. Edwin RS, De Schepper M, Gruyaert E, De Belie N (2016) Effect of secondary copper slag as cementitious material in ultra-high performance mortar. Constr Build Mater 119:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. CEN-CENELEC (2011) EN 196-9. Method of testing cement. Part 9: Determination of the heat of hydration. Semiadiabatic method. Brussels, Belgium

  22. Batog M, Giergiczny Z (2017) Influence of mass concrete constituents on its properties. Constr Build Mater 146:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schreck M, Wagner J (2017) Incentivizing secondary raw material markets for sustainable waste management. Waste Manag 67:354–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CEN-CENELEC (2005) EN 196-1. Method of testing cement. Part 1: Determination of strength. Brussels, Belgium

  26. CEN-CENELEC (2010) EN 196-6. Method of testing cement. Part 6: Determination of the fineness. Brussels, Belgium

  27. Manuel Fernández Cánovas (2004) Hormigón, 7a Ed

  28. Pereira-de-Oliveira LA, Castro-Gomes JP, Santos PMS (2012) The potential pozzolanic activity of glass and red-clay ceramic waste as cement mortars components. Constr Build Mater 31:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tironi A, Trezza MA, Scian AN, Irassar EF (2013) Assessment of pozzolanic activity of different calcined clays. Cem Concr Compos 37:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Medina C, Banfill PFG, Sánchez de Rojas MI, Frías M (2013) Rheological and calorimetric behaviour of cements blended with containing ceramic sanitary ware and construction/demolition waste. Constr Build Mater 40:822–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saraya ME-SI (2014) Study physico-chemical properties of blended cements containing fixed amount of silica fume, blast furnace slag, basalt and limestone, a comparative study. Constr Build Mater 72:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kocak Y, Nas S (2014) The effect of using fly ash on the strength and hydration characteristics of blended cements. Constr Build Mater 73:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Amin MS, El-Gamal SMA, Abo-El-Enein SA et al (2014) Physico-chemical characteristics of blended cement pastes containing electric arc furnace slag with and without silica fume. HBRC J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.002 (in press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. CEN-CENELEC (2014) EN 196-2. Method of testing cement. Part 2: Chemical analysis of cement. Brussels, Belgium

  35. Medina C, Sáez del Bosque IF, Asensio E et al (2016) Mineralogy and microstructure of hydrated phases during the pozzolanic reaction in the sanitary ware waste/Ca(OH)2 system. J Am Ceram Soc 99:340–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI, Rodríguez O et al (2008) Characterisation of calcined paper sludge as an environmentally friendly source of metakaolin for manufacture of cementitious materials. Adv Cem Res 20:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2008.20.1.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sánchez de Rojas MI, Frias M, Rivera J et al (2001) Research about the pozzolanic activity of waste materials from calcined clay. Mater Constr 51:45–52. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2001.v51.i261.379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Medina JM, Sáez del Bosque IF, Frías M et al (2017) Characterisation and valorisation of biomass waste as a possible addition in eco-cement design. Mater Struct 50:207. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1076-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Medina G, Sáez del Bosque IF, Frías M et al (2017) Granite quarry waste as a future eco-efficient supplementary cementitious material (SCM): scientific and technical considerations. J Clean Prod 148:467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kabay N, Tufekci MM, Kizilkanat AB, Oktay D (2015) Properties of concrete with pumice powder and fly ash as cement replacement materials. Constr Build Mater 85:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor HFW (1997) Cement chemistry. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Pacewska B, Nowacka M, Aleknevičius M, Antonovič V (2013) Early hydration of calcium aluminate cement blended with spent FCC catalyst at two temperatures. Procedia Eng 57:844–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. García de Lomas M, Sánchez de Rojas MI, Frías M (2007) Pozzolanic reaction of a spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst in FCC-cement mortars. J Therm Anal Calorim 90:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-006-7921-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received funding from several Spanish ministries under projects BIA2013-48876-C3-1-R, BIA2013-48876-C3-2-R and BIA2016-76643-C3-1-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eloy Asensio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asensio, E., Medina, C., Frías, M. et al. Use of clay-based construction and demolition waste as additions in the design of new low and very low heat of hydration cements. Mater Struct 51, 101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1226-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1226-8

Keywords

Navigation