Skip to main content
Log in

A critical discussion on rebar electrical continuity and usual interpretation thresholds in the field of half-cell potential measurements in steel reinforced concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrosion of steel in reinforced concrete structures is a recurrent problem affecting civil engineering structures and costing the world billions of dollars per year. This physical phenomenon mainly results from chloride ingress or concrete carbonation. Corrosion can be diagnosed through a nondestructive method such as half-cell potential measurements. The present paper studies this method on a reinforced concrete wall containing eighteen unconnected steel bars and subjected to chloride-induced macrocell corrosion. Three corrosion systems with different configurations of connections between the steel bars are generated, involving three different anode-to-cathode surface ratios. Then, half-cell potential variations are observed versus macrocell corrosion current. The results lead to a critical discussion regarding the physical relevance of the usual potential threshold method to detect corroding rebars in reinforced concrete structures. In addition, the experiments demonstrate that electrical continuity between reinforcing steel bars is not necessary to get meaningful information about the macrocell corrosion system. At last, the paper show that the electric field (potential gradient) relative to a macrocell corrosion system may be measured by connecting the measurement system (reference electrode + voltmeter) to any electrochemical system in electrolytic contact with the concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angst UM (2018) Challenges and opportunities in corrosion of steel in concrete. Mater Struct 51(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1131-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y (1996) Modeling the time-to corrosion cracking of the cover concrete in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures

  3. Tuutti K (1980) Service life of structures with regard to corrosion of embedded steel. ACI Spec Publ 65:223–236

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang R, Castel A, François R (2009) The corrosion pattern of reinforcement and its influence on serviceability of reinforced concrete members in chloride environment. Cem Concr Res 39(11):1077–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. González JA, Feliú S, Rodríguez P, Ramírez E, Alonso C, Andrade C (1996) Some questions on the corrosion of steel in concrete—Part I : when, how and how much steel corrodes. Mater Struct 29:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alonso C, Andrade C, González JA (1988) Relation between resistivity and corrosion rate of reinforcements in carbonated mortar made with several cement types. Cem Concr Res 18:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sohail MG, Laurens S, Deby F, Balayssac JP (2015) Significance of macrocell corrosion of reinforcing steel in partially carbonated concrete: numerical and experimental investigation. Mater Struct 48(1–2):217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marchand J, Laurens S, Protière Y, Samson E (2016) A numerical study of polarization tests applied to corrosion in reinforced concrete. ACI Spec Publ 312:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Recommendation of Rilem TC: 154-EMC (2000) Electrochemical techniques for measuring metallic corrosion—test methods for on-site measurement of resistivity of concrete. American Concr Inst 33:603–611

    Google Scholar 

  10. ASTM C876-09 (2009) Standard test method for corrosion potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. www.astm.org

  11. Elsener B, Andrade C, Gulikers J, Polder R, Raupach M (2003) Hall-cell potential measurements—potential mapping on reinforced concrete structures. Mater Struct 36(7):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reichling K, Raupach M, Broomfield J, Gulikers J, L’Hostis V, Kessler S, Osterminski K, Pepenar I, Schneck U, Sergi G, Tache G (2013) Full surface inspection methods regarding reinforcement corrosion of concrete structures. Mater Corros 64(2):116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertolini L, Elsener B, Pedeferri P, Redaelli E, Polder R (2013) Corrosion of steel in concrete: prevention, diagnosis and repair, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA) (2013) Conception, exécution et interpretation de la mesure de potentiel sur des ouvrages en béton armé, Cahier Technique 2006, Edition

  15. Reichling K, Raupach M (2014) Method to determine electrochemical potential gradients without reinforcement connection in concrete structures. Cem Concr Compos 47:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadowski L (2013) Methodology for assessing the probability of corrosion in concrete structures on the basis of half-cell potential and concrete resistivity measurements. Sci World J 2013:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elsener B (2001) Half-cell potential mapping to assess repair work on RC structures. Constr Build Mater 15(2–3):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. François R, Arliguie G, Bardy D (1994) Electrode potential measurements of concrete reinforcement for corrosion evaluation. Cem Concr Res 24(3):401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. François R, Arliguie G (1993) Measurements of electrode potential of concrete reinforcing bars using a bi-electrode system. In: International conference—N.D.T. in Civil Engineering, Liverpool, England

  20. Nakamura E, Watanabe H, Koga H, Nakamura M, Ikawa K (2008) Half-cell potential measurements to assess corrosion risk of reinforcement steels in a PC bridge. In: Binda L, di Prisco M, Felicetti R (eds) RILEM symposium on on site assessment of concrete, masonry and timber structures-SACoMaTiS, pp 109–117

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by INSA Toulouse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Sassine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sassine, E., Laurens, S., François, R. et al. A critical discussion on rebar electrical continuity and usual interpretation thresholds in the field of half-cell potential measurements in steel reinforced concrete. Mater Struct 51, 93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1221-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1221-0

Keywords

Navigation