Use of laminated mechanical joints with metal and concrete plates for precast concrete columns

  • J. D. Nzabonimpa
  • Won-Kee Hong
Original Article


This study investigated the structural behavior of a mechanical joint with laminated concrete and metal plates for moment connections which can be used for the rapid erection of reinforced concrete precast columns. A concrete filler plate was placed between the metal column plates to transfer loads and protect nuts threaded with rebars. Nonlinear numerical finite element analyses considering concrete damaged plasticity was also performed to evaluate the load–displacement relationship, plate deformation of the joints with concrete filler plates, and rates of strain increase of the structural components. The influence of the column and concrete filler plates on the rate of strain increase of the structural components attached to the column plates was explored to determine how concrete, rebars, and steel sections, were activated relative to the stiffness of the metal plates. The strain values of structural elements that were attached to plates with sufficient stiffness values were found to be higher than those of the structural elements that were attached to plates with smaller stiffness values. These strains were evident in the nonlinear finite element analyses and experimental investigations. It can be inferred that laminated mechanical plates consisting of metal and concrete plates can be implemented and used to replace conventional precast connections.


Column to column connection Steel–concrete composite precast frames Moment connection Concrete filler plate Concrete damaged plasticity Nonlinear finite element analysis 



This work was also supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1A02937558).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Thambiratnam DP, Paramasivam P (1986) Base plates under axial loads and moments. J Struct Eng 112(5):1166–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grilli D, Jones R, Kanvinde A (2017) Seismic performance of embedded column base connections subjected to axial and lateral loads. J Struct Eng 143(5):04017010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabrero JM, Bayo E (2005) Development of practical design methods for steel structures with semi-rigid connections. Eng Struct 27(8):1125–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Da Silva JG, De Lima LR, Vellasco PD, De Andrade S, De Castro RA (2008) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel portal frames with semi-rigid connections. Eng Struct 30(9):2566–2579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fathi M, Daneshjoo F, Melchers RE (2006) A method for determining the behaviour factor of moment-resisting steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Eng Struct 28(4):514–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takhirov SM, Popov EP (2002) Bolted large seismic steel beam-to-column connections part 2: numerical nonlinear analysis. Eng Struct 24(12):1535–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Popov EP, Takhirov SM (2002) Bolted large seismic steel beam-to-column connections part 1: experimental study. Eng Struct 24(12):1523–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang J, Chen L (2012) Experimental investigation of extended end plate joints to concrete-filled steel tubular columns. J Constr Steel Res 79:56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim T, Whittaker AS, Gilani AS, Bertero VV, Takhirov SM (2002) Experimental evaluation of plate-reinforced steel moment-resisting connections. J Struct Eng 128(4):483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mashaly E, El-Heweity M, Abou-Elfath H, Osman M (2011) Finite element analysis of beam-to-column joints in steel frames under cyclic loading. Alex Eng J 50(1):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mashaly E, El-Heweity M, Abou-Elfath H, Osman M (2011) Behavior of four-bolt extended end-plate connection subjected to lateral loading. Alex Eng J 50(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muresan IC, Balc R (2015) Finite element analysis of an extended end-plate connection using the T-stub approach. In: AIP conference proceedings, AIP Publishing, vol 1648(1), pp 850091Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bai R, Chan SL, Hao JP (2015) Improved design of extended end-plate connection allowing for prying effects. J Constr Steel Res 113:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maggi YI, Gonçalves RM, Leon RT, Ribeiro LF (2005) Parametric analysis of steel bolted end plate connections using finite element modeling. J Constr Steel Res 61(5):689–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AISC 358–05 (2005) Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. American Institute of Steel Construction, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi HK, Choi YC, Choi CS (2013) Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections. Eng Struct 56:1820–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Precast Concrete Association. Architectural precast concrete wall panels connection guide.
  18. 18.
    Parastesh H, Hajirasouliha I, Ramezani R (2014) A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: an experimental investigation. Eng Struct 70:144–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Metelli G, Riva P (2008) Behaviour of a beam to column “dry” joint for precast concrete elements. InL The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 12–17Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Metelli G, Beschi C, Riva P (2011) Cyclic behaviour of a column to foundation joint for concrete precast structures. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 15(9):1297–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunesi E, Nascimbene R (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic response of precast wall connections. Bull Earthq Eng 15(12):5511–5550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu JY, Hong WK, Park SC (2017) Experimental investigation of precast concrete based dry mechanical column–column joints for precast concrete frames. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 26(5):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.14-2. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.,Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringKyung Hee UniversityYongin-si, Gyeonggi-doRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations