Materials and Structures

, 50:229 | Cite as

Impact of the initial moisture level and pre-wetting history of recycled concrete aggregates on their water absorption

  • Eliane Khoury
  • Bogdan Cazacliu
  • Sébastien Remond
Original Article
  • 208 Downloads

Abstract

Initial moisture and pre-wetting method influence on the water absorption of recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) have been studied experimentally. For this purpose, RCA were pre-wetted by three methods: soaking under partial vacuum (simulating long term wetting), soaking under atmospheric pressure, and spraying (simulating short term wetting). The results show that the same initial amount of water in two samples of RCA do not lead to the same total amount of water absorbed by RCA during 5–120 min. The latter depends on the way they have been pre-wetted (either long term or short term). It is suggested that this phenomenon is related to the accessibility filled pores in the different pre-wetting methods. So, the pre-wetting history of RCA could change the amount of total water absorbed by the RCA up to 1%. When mixing and casting concrete are produced with RCA, the corresponding error in the determination of the effective water should have adverse effects on the fresh and hardened concrete characteristics. In this study real applications on mixtures of recycled concrete have been carried out, where the influence of initial moisture content and pre-wetting history of RCA on fresh recycled concrete properties (slump) have been investigated.

Keywords

Recycled concrete aggregates Water absorption Pre-wetting Partial vacuum Accessible porosity Air drying 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Recybeton PN (2012) Complete recycling of concrete. http://www.pnrecybeton.fr/
  2. 2.
    Eguchi K, Teranishi K, Nakagome A et al (2007) Application of recycled coarse aggregate by mixture to concrete construction. Constr Build Mater 21:1542–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Puthussery JV, Kumar R, Garg A (2016) Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates for their suitability in construction activities: an experimental study. Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.008 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belin P, Habert G, Thiery M, Roussel N (2013) Cement paste content and water absorption of recycled concrete coarse aggregates. Mater Struct 47:1451–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le T, Rémond S, Le Saout G, Garcia-Diaz E (2016) Fresh behavior of mortar based on recycled sand—influence of moisture condition. Constr Build Mater 106:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mills-Beale J, You Z, Williams RC, Dai Q (2009) Determining the specific gravities of coarse aggregates utilizing vacuum saturation approach. Constr Build Mater 23:1316–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quattrone M, Cazacliu B, Angulo SC et al (2016) Measuring the water absorption of recycled aggregates, what is the best practice for concrete production? Constr Build Mater 123:690–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castro J, Keiser L, Golias M, Weiss J (2011) Absorption and desorption properties of fine lightweight aggregate for application to internally cured concrete mixtures. Cem Concr Compos 33:1001–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dils J, Boel V, De Schutter G (2013) Influence of cement type and mixing pressure on air content, rheology and mechanical properties of UHPC. Constr Build Mater 41:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angulo SC, Carrijo PM, Figueiredo AD et al (2010) On the classification of mixed construction and demolition waste aggregate by porosity and its impact on the mechanical performance of concrete. Mater Struct 43:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montero J, Laserna S (2017) Influence of effective mixing water in recycled concrete. Constr Build Mater 132:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L et al (2004) Influence of moisture states of natural and recycled aggregates on the slump and compressive strength of concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brand AS, Roesler JR, Salas A (2015) Initial moisture and mixing effects on higher quality recycled coarse aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 79:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mefteh H, Kebaïli O, Oucief H et al (2013) Influence of moisture conditioning of recycled aggregates on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete. J Clean Prod 54:282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lo Y, Gao XF, Jeary AP (1999) Microstructure of pre-wetted aggregate on lightweight concrete. Build Environ 34(6):759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lo TY, Cui HZ, Li ZG (2003) Influence of aggregate pre-wetting and fly ash on mechanical properties of lightweight concrete. Waste Manag 24:333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliane Khoury
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bogdan Cazacliu
    • 1
  • Sébastien Remond
    • 2
  1. 1.Aggregates and Materials Processing LaboratoryIFSTTARBouguenais CedexFrance
  2. 2.EA 4515 - LGCgE – Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géoEnvironnement, département Génie Civil & EnvironnementalIMT Lille Douai, Univ. LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations