Numerical simulation of self-consolidating concrete flow as a heterogeneous material in L-Box set-up: coupled effect of reinforcing bars and aggregate content on flow characteristics


A computational fluid dynamics software was employed to simulate the coupled effect of reinforcing bar spacing and coarse aggregate content on the blocking resistance and shear-induced segregation of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) along the horizontal channel of the L-Box apparatus. The rheology of the modelled suspending fluid, which corresponds to the stable and homogeneous portion of the mixture, consists of plastic viscosity value of 25 Pa s, yield stress values of 75 Pa, fluid density of 2500 kg/m3, and shear elasticity modulus value of 100 Pa. Two different values of 20-mm spherical particles (135 and 255 particles in total), as well as three bar arrangements consisting of 0, 3, and 18 bars distributed along the horizontal channel of the L-Box were considered in the numerical simulations. A new approach is proposed to evaluate the coupled effect of reinforcing bar arrangements and the number of spherical particles on the flow performance of SCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. 1.

    ACI Committee 237 (2007) Self-consolidating concrete, ACI 237R-07. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  2. 2.

    Khayat KH, Mitchell D (2009) Self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete bridge elements. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 628. Transporation Research Board of the National Academies

  3. 3.

    Roussel N (2012) Understanding the rheology of concrete, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston. ISBN 9780857090287

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Thrane LN (2007) Form filling with self-compacting concrete. Ph.D. Dissertation, Danish technological institute

  5. 5.

    Khayat KH (1999) Workability, testing, and performance of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 96(3):346–353

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Khayat KH (1998) Use of viscosity-modifying admixture to reduce top-bar effect of anchored bars cast with fluid concrete. ACI Mater J 95(2):158–167

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sonebi M, Grünewald S, Walraven J (2007) Filling ability and passing ability of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 104(2):162–170

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    EFNARC (2002) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. EFNARC, Norfolk. ISBN 0-9539733-4-4

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nguyen TLH, Roussel N, Coussot P (2006) Correlation between L-box test and rheological parameters of a homogeneous yield stress fluid. Cem Concr Res 36:1789–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lashkarbolouk H, Chamani MR, Halabian AM, Pishevar AR (2013) Viscosity evaluation of SCC based on flow simulation in the L-box test. Mag Concr Res 65(6):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Turgut P, Turk K, Bakirci H (2012) Segregation control of SCC with a modified L-box apparatus. Mag Concr Res 64(8):707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nepomuceno MCS, Preira-de-Oliveira LA, Lopes SMR, Franco RMC (2016) Maximum coarse aggregate’s volume fraction in self-compacting concrete for different flow restrictions. Constr Build Mater 113:851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yahia A, Khayat KH, Sayed M (2012) Statistical modelling of the coupled effect of mix design and rebar spacing on restricted flow characteristics of SCC. Constr Build Mater 37:699–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roussel N, Geiker MR, Dufour F, Thrane LN, Szabo P (2007) Computational modeling of concrete flow: general overview. Cem Concr Res 37:1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yammine J, Chaouche M, Guerinet M, Moranville M, Roussel N (2008) From ordinary rheology concrete to self compacting concrete: a transition between frictional and hydrodynamic interactions. Cem Concr Res 38:890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Roussel N, Gram A, Cremonesi M, Ferrara L, Krenzer K, Mechtcherine V, Shyshko S, Skocec J, Spangenberg J, Svec O, Thrane LN, Vasilic K (2016) Numerical simulations of concrete flow: a benchmark comparison. Cem Concr Res 79:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shen L, Struble L, Lange DA (2009) Modeling dynamic segregation of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 106(4):375–380

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Spangenberg J, Roussel N, Hattel JH, Stang H, Skocek J, Geiker MR (2012) Flow induced particle migration in fresh concrete: theoretical frame, numerical simulations and experimental results on model fluids. Cem Concr Res 42:633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Spangenberg J, Roussel N, Hattel JH, Sarmiento EV, Zirgulis G, Geiker MR (2012) Patterns of gravity induced aggregate migration during casting of fluid concretes. Cem Concr Res 42:1571–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vasilic K, Schmidt W, Kühne HC, Haamkens F, Mechtcherine V, Roussel N (2016) Flow of fresh concrete through reinforced elements: experimental validation of the porous analogy numerical method. Cem Concr Res 88:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hosseinpoor M, Khayat KH, Yahia A (2016) Numerical simulation of self-consolidating concrete flow as a heterogeneous material in L-box set-up—effect of rheological parameters on flow performance. Cem Concr Composites

  23. 23.

    Vanhove Y, Djelal C (2013) Friction mechanisms of fresh concrete under pressure. Int J Civil Eng Technol (IJCIET) 4(6):67–81

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    FLOW-3D user guide.

  25. 25.

    RILEM State of the Art Report, Technical Committee 222-SCF (2014) Simulation of fresh concrete flow. Springer, Imprint. ISBN 978-94-017-8883-0

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Körner C, Thies M, Hofmann T, Thürey N, Rüde U (2005) Lattice Boltzman model for free surface flow for modeling foaming. J Stat Phys 121(1):179–196

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Man H-K, van Mier JGM (2011) Damage distribution and size effect in numerical concrete from lattice analyses. Cement Concr Compos 33:867–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Eliáš J, Stang H (2012) Lattice modeling of aggregate interlocking in concrete. Int J Fract 175(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thrane LN (2007) Form filling with self-compacting concrete. Ph.D. thesis, Danish Technological Institute

Download references


The authors wish to thank the financial support of the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the 16 industrial partners participating in the NSERC Chair on High Performance Flowable Concrete with Adapted Rheology, held by Professor Kamal H. Khayat of the Université de Sherbrooke.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal H. Khayat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseinpoor, M., Khayat, K.H. & Yahia, A. Numerical simulation of self-consolidating concrete flow as a heterogeneous material in L-Box set-up: coupled effect of reinforcing bars and aggregate content on flow characteristics. Mater Struct 50, 163 (2017).

Download citation


  • Blocking
  • Dynamic segregation
  • Flow simulation
  • Heterogeneous analysis
  • L-Box test
  • Self-consolidating concrete