Numerical simulation of self-consolidating concrete flow as a heterogeneous material in L-Box set-up: coupled effect of reinforcing bars and aggregate content on flow characteristics
- 460 Downloads
A computational fluid dynamics software was employed to simulate the coupled effect of reinforcing bar spacing and coarse aggregate content on the blocking resistance and shear-induced segregation of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) along the horizontal channel of the L-Box apparatus. The rheology of the modelled suspending fluid, which corresponds to the stable and homogeneous portion of the mixture, consists of plastic viscosity value of 25 Pa s, yield stress values of 75 Pa, fluid density of 2500 kg/m3, and shear elasticity modulus value of 100 Pa. Two different values of 20-mm spherical particles (135 and 255 particles in total), as well as three bar arrangements consisting of 0, 3, and 18 bars distributed along the horizontal channel of the L-Box were considered in the numerical simulations. A new approach is proposed to evaluate the coupled effect of reinforcing bar arrangements and the number of spherical particles on the flow performance of SCC.
KeywordsBlocking Dynamic segregation Flow simulation Heterogeneous analysis L-Box test Self-consolidating concrete
The authors wish to thank the financial support of the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the 16 industrial partners participating in the NSERC Chair on High Performance Flowable Concrete with Adapted Rheology, held by Professor Kamal H. Khayat of the Université de Sherbrooke.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.ACI Committee 237 (2007) Self-consolidating concrete, ACI 237R-07. American Concrete Institute, Farmington HillsGoogle Scholar
- 2.Khayat KH, Mitchell D (2009) Self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete bridge elements. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 628. Transporation Research Board of the National AcademiesGoogle Scholar
- 4.Thrane LN (2007) Form filling with self-compacting concrete. Ph.D. Dissertation, Danish technological instituteGoogle Scholar
- 5.Khayat KH (1999) Workability, testing, and performance of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 96(3):346–353Google Scholar
- 6.Khayat KH (1998) Use of viscosity-modifying admixture to reduce top-bar effect of anchored bars cast with fluid concrete. ACI Mater J 95(2):158–167Google Scholar
- 7.Sonebi M, Grünewald S, Walraven J (2007) Filling ability and passing ability of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 104(2):162–170Google Scholar
- 8.EFNARC (2002) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. EFNARC, Norfolk. ISBN 0-9539733-4-4Google Scholar
- 17.Shen L, Struble L, Lange DA (2009) Modeling dynamic segregation of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 106(4):375–380Google Scholar
- 22.Hosseinpoor M, Khayat KH, Yahia A (2016) Numerical simulation of self-consolidating concrete flow as a heterogeneous material in L-box set-up—effect of rheological parameters on flow performance. Cem Concr CompositesGoogle Scholar
- 23.Vanhove Y, Djelal C (2013) Friction mechanisms of fresh concrete under pressure. Int J Civil Eng Technol (IJCIET) 4(6):67–81Google Scholar
- 24.FLOW-3D user guide. www.flow3d.com
- 25.RILEM State of the Art Report, Technical Committee 222-SCF (2014) Simulation of fresh concrete flow. Springer, Imprint. ISBN 978-94-017-8883-0Google Scholar
- 29.Thrane LN (2007) Form filling with self-compacting concrete. Ph.D. thesis, Danish Technological InstituteGoogle Scholar