Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio on mechanical behavior and capillary sorption of MK-based alkali-activated composites reinforced with PVA fibers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio on the mechanical behavior of poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber-reinforced alkali-activated matrices (PVA-AAM) based on the activation of metakaolin (MK) as a source material. Different volume fractions (0, 1 and 2%) of PVA fibers were used to reinforce MK-based matrices with different compositions (SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratios, i.e. 3.0, 3.4 and 3.8). The amount of activation solution was adjusted to maintain same workability for all fresh mixes and account for the fiber addition. The mechanical properties assessed were compressive and flexural strengths as well as toughness, followed by optical microscopy to observe the fractured surfaces. Capillary sorption test was conducted to estimate the durability of the composites. Test results show that the matrices of PVA-AAM can be designed for the development of high performance composites, with significantly improved deformation and toughness, as it is the case for matrices with higher SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio and 2% PVA fiber. Adjustments in the content of the activation solution may reduce the mechanical strength. However, as the amount of activation solution increases in the mixes, so does the toughness of the PVA fiber-reinforced composites, which indicates a good correlation between the amount of soluble silica in the fresh AAM and toughness in bending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, van Riessen A, Corder GD (2011) Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1080–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Const Build Mater 43:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández-Jiménez AM, Palomo A, López-Hombrados C (2006) Engineering properties of alkali-activated concrete. ACI Mater J 103(2):106–112

    Google Scholar 

  4. Palomo A, Blanco-Varela MT, Granizo ML, Puertas F, Vazquez T, Grutzeck MW (1999) Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin. Cem Concr Res 29:997–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakharev T (2005) Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cem Concr Res 35:658–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakharev T (2005) Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solution. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1233–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG (2008) Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Compos 30:986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG (2010) Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete. Cem Concr Res 40(2):334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li V, Kanda T (1998) Innovations forum: engineered cementitious composites for structural applications. J Mater Civ Eng 10(66):66–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li VC (1998) Engineered Cementitious Composites—tailored composites through micromechanical modeling. In: Banthia N, Bentur A, Mufti A (eds) Fiber reinforced concrete: present and the future. Canadian Society of Civil Engineers, Montreal, p 213

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li VC (2003) On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC)—a review of the material and its applications. J Adv Concr Technol 1(3):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhou X (2005) Short fiber reinforced geopolymer composites manufactured by extrusion. J Mater Civ Eng 17(6):624–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Sun W, Li Z (2006) Impact behavior and microstructural characteristics of PVA fiber reinforced fly ash-geopolymer boards prepared by extrusion technique. J Mater Sci 41(10):2787–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Sun W, Li Z, Zhou X, Eddie, Chau C (2008) Impact properties of geopolymer based extrudates incorporated with fly ash and PVA short fiber. Constr Build Mater 22(3):370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J, Uddin F, Shaikh A (2014) Comparative deflection hardening behavior of short fiber reinforced geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 70:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J, Shaikh AF (2015) Tensile strain hardening behavior of PVA fiber-reinforced engineered geopolymer composite. J Mater Civ Eng 27(10):5696–5704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohno M, Li VC (2014) A feasibility study of strain hardening fiber reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 57:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaikh FUA (2013) Deflection hardening behavior of short fibre reinforced fly ash based geopolymer composites. Mater Des 50:674–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P, Lukey GC (2007) Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. J Hazard Mater A139:506–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG (2007) A new approach for the classification of coal fly ashes based on their origin, composition, properties, and behavior. Fuel 86:1490–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, van Deventer JSJ (2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 269:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y, Sun W, Li Z (2006) Impact behavior and microstructural characteristics of PVA fiber reinforced fly ash-geopolymer boards prepared by extrusion technique. J Mater Sci 41:2787–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Sun W, Li Z, Zhou X (2009) Geopolymer extruded composites with incorporated fly ash and polyvinyl alcohol short fiber. ACI Mater J 106(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heah CY, Kamarudin H, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Bnhussin M, Luqman M, Khairul Nizar IK, Ruzaidi CM, Liew YM (2012) Study on solid-to-liquid and alkaline activator ratios on kaolin-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 35:912–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yunsheng Z, Wei S, Zongjin L (2010) Composition design and microstructural characterization of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer cement. Appl Clay Sci 47(3–4):271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. BS EN 1015-3, Methods of test for mortar for masonry—part 3: determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table), p 6

  27. Provis JL, Bílek V, Buchwald A, Dombrowsky-Daube K, Varela B (2014) In: RILEM TC 224-AAM—Alkali Activated Materials. State-of-the-Art Report. Chapter 10. Durability and testing—physical processes, pp 277–307

  28. ASTM C39, Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens

  29. ASTM C 1609, Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading)

  30. ASTM C1585-13, Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes, p 6

  31. NBR 9779—Hardened mortar and concrete—determination of water absorption by capillarity—method of test (2012), p 2

  32. Barbosa VF, MacKenzie KJ, Thaumaturgo C (2000) Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers. Int J Inorg Polym 2:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Menon FA, Nuruddin MF, Shafiq N (2013) Effect of silica fume on the fresh and hardened properties of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Int J Miner Metall Mater 20(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bernal SA, Rodríguez ED, de Gutiérrez RM, Provis JL, Delvasto S (2012) Activation of metakaolin/slag blends using alkaline solutions based on chemically modified silica fume and rice husk ash. Waste Biomass Valoriz 3(1):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W (2017) Compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer blended with silica fume under thermal cycle. Cem Concr Compos 78:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Silva P, Sagoe-Crenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V (2007) Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cem Concr Res 37(4):512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Varela B, Rodgers JW (2011) Mechanical response of discontinuous filament PVA fiber reinforced geopolymers In: Kriven WM, Gyekenyesi AL, Wang J, Widjaja S, Singh D (eds) Developments in strategic materials and computational design II: ceramic engineering and science proceedings, vol 32. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 29–34. doi:10.1002/9781118095393.ch3

  38. Bayasi Z, Zeng J (1993) Properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 90(6):605–610

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bae S, Yi NH, Kim HY, Kim J-HJ, Song Y-C (2010) Material and structural performance evaluation of recycled PET fiber reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Compos 32:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of Canada-India Research Center of Excellence (IC-IMPACTS) in this research is highly appreciated. Paulo H. R. Borges would like to thank CNPQ, (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Brazil for funding his stay at the University of British Columbia, where this research was carried out (Grant 201091/2014-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science, The University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Paulo H. R. Borges, Aamer Bhutta & Nemkumar Banthia

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Centre for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Av. Amazonas 7675, Belo Horizonte, 30510-000, Brazil

    Paulo H. R. Borges & Luiggi T. Bavuzo

Authors
  1. Paulo H. R. Borges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aamer Bhutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luiggi T. Bavuzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nemkumar Banthia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aamer Bhutta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borges, P.H.R., Bhutta, A., Bavuzo, L.T. et al. Effect of SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio on mechanical behavior and capillary sorption of MK-based alkali-activated composites reinforced with PVA fibers. Mater Struct 50, 148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1021-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1021-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation