Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental assessment of adobe masonry assemblages under monotonic and loading–unloading compression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates experimentally the response of adobe masonry assemblages to monotonic and loading–unloading compression. Specimens with variable composition and construction patterns are examined following different drying/curing ages. The aforementioned parameters are shown to affect the mode of failure, as well as the load-bearing and deformation capacities of the specimens under study. The results show that the stress–strain response of adobe masonry under compression is highly non-linear and is governed by progressive densification due to compaction and consolidation induced by increasing loading. The values of compressive strength, elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio obtained from the tests are compared against corresponding data from the literature and predictions yielded by empirical/analytical relations. This comparison confirms that certain models can adequately approximate adobe masonry’s load-bearing capacity. Such models may be used in future research aiming at improved adobe testing and earth masonry design codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binda, L, Schueremans, L, Verstrynge, E, Ignoul, S, Oliveira, DV, Lourenço, PB, Modena, C (2008) Long term compressive testing of masonry—test procedure and practical experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural analysis of Historical Constructions, Bath, UK, 2–4 July

  2. Gavrilovic, P, Sendova, V, Ginell, WS, Tolles, L (1998) Behaviour of adobe structures during shaking table tests and earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CNIT, Paris la Défense, France, 6–11 September

  3. Illampas R, Charmpis DC, Ioannou I (2014) Laboratory testing and finite element simulation of the structural response of an adobe masonry building under horizontal loading. Eng Struct 80(1):362–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Illampas R, Ioannou I, Charmpis DC (2013) Overview of the pathology, repair and strengthening of adobe structures. Int J Archit Herit 7(2):165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Illampas R, Ioannou I, Charmpis DC (2014) Adobe bricks under compression: experimental investigation and derivation of stress–strain equation. Constr Build Mater 53(1):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahini SS, Eslami A, Ronagh HR (2012) Lateral performance and load carrying capacity of an unreinforced, CFRP-retrofitted historical masonry vault: a case study. Constr Build Mater 28(1):146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahini, SS, Ronagh, HR, Eslami, A (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of historical masonry vaults using FRPS—a case study. In: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures APFIS 2007, Hong Kong, China, 12–14 December (2007)

  8. Miccoli L, Müller U, Fontana P (2014) Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: a comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Constr Build Mater 61(1):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varum H, Figueiredo A, Silveira D, Martins T, Costa A (2011) Research conducted at the University of Aveiro on mechanical characterization of existing adobe buildings in Portugal and proposals for rehabilitation and reinforcement–results achieved [In Spanish]. Informes de la Construcción 63(523):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Varum, H, Tarque, N, Silveira, D, Camata, G, Lobo, B, Blondet, M, Figueiredo, A, Rafi, MM, Oliveira, C, Costa, A (2014) Structural behaviour and retrofitting of adobe masonry buildings. In: Structural Rehabilitation of old Buildings, Vol. 2: Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  11. Wu F, Li G, Li HN, Jia JQ (2013) Strength and stress–strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Mater Struct 46(9):1449–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartolomé, AS, Delgado, E, Quiun, D (2009) Seismic behaviour of two storey model of confined adobe masonry. In: Proceedings of the 11th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 31 May–3 June (2009)

  13. Blondet, M, Vargas, J (1978) Research on rural housing [In Spanish], Ministry of Communications, Infrastructure and Housing, Report of the Division of Civil Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

  14. Caporale A, Parisi F, Asprone D, Luciano R, Prota A (2014) Critical surfaces for adobe masonry: micromechanical approach. Comp Struct 56(B):790–796

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dowling, D (2006) Seismic strengthening of Adobe–Mudbrick houses. University of Technology, PhD Thesis: Faculty of Engineering, Sydney

  16. Quagliarini E, Lenci S, Iorio M (2010) Mechanical properties of adobe walls in a Roman Republican domus at Suasa. J Cult Herit 11(2):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tolles, EL, Krawinkler, H (1990) Seismic studies on small-scale models of adobe houses. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Technical Report No. 91: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, Stanford

  18. Tuohuti A, Bekey S, Cao G (2012) Study of uniaxial compression constitutive models for adobe masonry. Eng Mech 29(12):295–301

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vargas, J, Ottazzi, G (1980) Research on adobe [in Spanish]. Ministry of Transport, Communications, Housing and Construction, Report of the Division of Civil Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

  20. Vicente, EF, Torrealva, DE (2014) Mechanical properties of adobe masonry of historical buildings in Peru. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Mexico City, Mexico

  21. Almeida, JAPP (2012) Mechanical characterization of traditional adobe masonry elements. University of Minho, MSc Thesis: Department of Civil Engineering, Guimarães

  22. ASTM C1314-14 (2014) Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/C1314-14, www.astm.org

  23. EN 1052-1 (1999) Methods of test for masonry—Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. CEN, Brussels

  24. NTE E0.80 (2000) Adobe: technical building standard [In Spanish]. Ministry of Transport, Communications, Housing and Construction, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  25. NZ4298 (1998) Materials and workmanship for earth buildings. Standards New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM E2392/E2392 M (2012) Standard Guide for Design of Earthen Wall Building systems. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/E2392_E2392M-10E01, www.astm.org

  27. Pkla A, Mesbah A, Rigassi V, Morel JC (2003) Comparaison de méthodes d’essais de mesures des caractéristiques mécaniques des mortiers de terre [In French]. Mater Struct 36(2):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM D2487-11 Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/D2487-11, www.astm.org

  29. BS 1377:2 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes—Part 2: classification tests. BSI, London

  30. EN 1015-11 (1999) Methods of test for mortar for masonry—Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar, CEN, Brussels

  31. Eftychiou, M (2013) Laboratory production and optimization of traditional adobe bricks [In Greek]. University of Cyprus, MSc Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

  32. Walker PJ (2004) Strength and erosion characteristics of earth blocks and earth block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 16(5):497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meyer CS (2013) Numerical simulations of the mechanical behavior of adobe. In: Chalivendra V, Song B, Casem D (eds) Dynamic behavior of materials, vol 1., Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied MechanicsSpringer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keefe L (2005) Earth buildings: methods, materials, repair and conservation. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Minke G (2009) Building with earth: design and technology of a sustainable architecture. Birkhäuser, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Norton J (1997) Building with earth: a handbook. Intermediate Technology, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Sturm T, Ramos LF, Lourenço PB (2015) Characterization of dry-stack interlocking compressed earth blocks. Mater Struct 48(9):3059–3074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Prasanna Kumar P (2011) Cement stabilised rammed earth. Part B: compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics. Mater Struct 44(3):695–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hakimi A, Fassi-Fehri O, Bouabid H, Charif D’ouazzane S, El Kortbi M (1999) Non-linear behaviour of the compressed earthen block by elasticity-damage coupling [In French]. Mater Struct 32(7):539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li C, Nordlund E (1993) Experimental verification of the Kaiser effect in rocks. Rock Mech Rocks Eng 26(4):333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Briaud JL (2001) Introduction to soil moduli. Geotech News 19(2):54–58

    Google Scholar 

  42. Briaud J, Li Y, Rhee K (2006) BCD: a soil modulus device for compaction control. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(1):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bui QB, Morel JC, Hans S, Meunier N (2009) Compression behaviour of non-industrial materials in civil engineering by three scale experiments: the case of rammed earth. Mater Struct 42(8):1101–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tassios TP (1987) Masonry mechanics [In Greek]. Symmetria, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  45. Karantoni VF (2004) Masonry constructions: design and repair [In Greek]. Papasotiriou, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  46. Eurocode 6 2005, EN 1996-1-1: Design of masonry structures—Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry. CEN, Brussels

  47. Mann, W (1982) Statistical evaluation of tests on masonry by potential functions. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Brick Masonry Conference, Rome, Italy, 16–19 May

  48. Dymiotis C, Gutlederer BM (2002) Allowing for uncertainties in the modelling of masonry compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 16(8):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tassios, TP (1983) Physical and mathematical models for redesign of damaged structures. Introductory Report, IASBE Symposium, Venice, Italy

  50. Karaveziroglou, M, Papayianni, I (1993) Compressive strength of masonry with thick mortar joints. In: Proceedings of the UNESCO/RILEM International Conference on the Conservation of Stone and Other Materials, Paris, France, 29 June–1 July

  51. Francis, A, Horman, C, Jerrems, L (1970) The effect of joint thickness and other factors on the compressive strength of brickwork. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick/Block Masonry Conference, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom, 12–15 April

  52. Khoo, C, Hendry, A (1973) A failure criterion for brickwork in axial compression. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Brick/Block Masonry Conference, Essen, Germany, 8–11 January

  53. García D, San-José JT, Garmendia L, San-Mateos R (2012) Experimental study of traditional stone masonry under compressive load and comparison of results with design codes. Mater Struct 45(7):995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. DIN 18945:2013-08 Earth blocks—terms and definitions, requirements, test methods. Beuth Verlag, Berlin

  55. Heathcote K, Jankulovski E (1992) Aspect ratio correction factors for soilcrete blocks. Aust Civ Eng Trans 34(4):309–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the University of Cyprus, the European Regional Development Fund and the Republic of Cyprus, through the Research Promotion Foundation (Projects ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΙΣ/ΠΡΟΙΟΝ/0609/41 and ΝΕΑ ΥΠΟΔΟΜΗ/ΝΕΚΥΠ/0308/17). Vasilios Loizou is also gratefully acknowledged for providing the data concerning the raw materials of the adobes examined in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, 75, Kallipoleos str., P.O. Box 20537, 1678, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Rogiros Illampas, Ioannis Ioannou & Dimos C. Charmpis

Authors
  1. Rogiros Illampas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ioannis Ioannou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dimos C. Charmpis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Ioannou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Illampas, R., Ioannou, I. & Charmpis, D.C. Experimental assessment of adobe masonry assemblages under monotonic and loading–unloading compression. Mater Struct 50, 79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0952-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0952-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation