Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic performance of traditional adobe masonry walls subjected to in-plane cyclic loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional adobe masonry wall is made of natural soil, sand, fiber materials without artificial hydraulic binders such as cement, lime and etc. It has been wildly used in residential buildings all over the world for thousands of years. This paper mainly aims at obtaining an insight on the seismic performance of traditional adobe walls subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Consequently, five 1/2-scale specimens were tested under various levels of vertical stress and height/length ratios. The test results showed that three failure modes including flexural cracking/diagonal shear, rocking/toe crushing/bed joint sliding and rocking/bed joint sliding were observed to be showing horizontal and stair-stepped cracks on the interfaces between block and mortar. The failure mechanism, crack patterns and force–displacement responses were summarized and found to be similar to those of URM walls. However, significant residual displacements under each cyclic loading improved the drift limit and energy-dissipation capacity greatly. The mean value of ultimate linear and peak drift were 0.37 and 1.07 % which were about 3 and 4.5 times greater than those of URM wall. Moreover, the displacement ductility was improved. The values of equivalent viscous damping ratio varied from 0.1 to 0.3 with drift. The damping ratio values were significantly higher than those of URM, and almost equal to those of reinforced masonry walls failing in flexure. Based on test results above, it can be concluded that although lateral force resistance was weaker the deformation resistance and energy-dissipation capacity were higher than those of URM wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jayasinghe C, Mallawaarachchi RS (2009) Flexural strength of compressed stabilized earth masonry materials. Mater Des 30(9):3859–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kafescioglu R, Guerdal E, Guner A, Akman MS (1983) Adobe blocks stabilzed with gypsum. In: Appropriate building materials for low cost housing: African region, Proceedings of a Symposium. E. & F. N. Spon, London

  3. Lynne E, Cassandra A (2005) Alternative construction: contemporary natural building methods. John Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morel JC, Pkla A, Walker P (2007) Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Constr Build Mater 21:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Millogo Y, Morel JC (2012) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of cement stabilised adobes. Mater Struct 45(9):1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy VBV, Lal R, Nanjunda Rao KS (2009) Influence of joint thickness and mortar-block elastic properties on the strength and stresses developed in soil-cement block masonry. J Mater Civil Eng 21(10):535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy VBV, Gupta A (2006) Strength and elastic properties of stabilized mud block masonry using cement-soil mortars. J Mater Civil Eng 18(3):472–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy VBV, Vyas U (2008) Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress-strain characteristics of masonry. Mater Struct 41(10):1697–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker P (1995) Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilized soil blocks. Cement Concr Compos 17(4):201–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker P (2004) Strength and erosion characteristics of earth block masonry. J Mater Civil Eng 11(3):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabio T, John EA, Emily S (2009) 2007 August 15 magnitude 7.9 near the coast of Central Peru: analysis and filed mission report. Bull Earthq Eng 7(1):1–70

  12. Gang L, Xiao-yu L, Hong-nan L (2009) Seismic damage investigation and analysis on rural buildings in Wenchuan earthquake. J Dalian Univ Technol 49(5):724–730 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maheri MR, Naeim F, Mehrain M (2005) Performance of adobe residential buildings in the 2003 bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21(S1):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen-rong W, Kai C (1987) Experimental studies on shear strength of loess adobe masonry walls. Earthq Resist Eng 3:31–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silveira D, Varum H, Costa A, Carvalho J (2015) Mechanical properties and behavior of traditional adobe wall panels of the Aveiro district. J Mater Civil Eng 27(9):04014253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartolome AS, Quiun D, Zegarra L (2008) Performance of reinforced adobe houses in Pisco, Peru earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  17. Blondet M, Torrealva D, Ginocchio F, Vargas J, Velásquez J (2006) Seismic reinforcement of adobe houses using external polymer mesh. In: Proceedings of the 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering 2006, Oakland

  18. Blondet M, Vargas J et al (2008) A human development approach for the construction of safe and healthy adobe houses in seismic areas. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  19. Figueiredo A, Varum H, Costa A, Silveira D, Oliveira C (2013) Seismic retrofitting solution of an adobe masonry wall. Mater Struct 46(1–2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rojas J, Ferrer H, Cuenca JS (2008) Dynamic behavior of adobe houses in central Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

  21. Torrealva D, Cerron C, Espinoza Y (2008) Shear and out of plane bending strength of adobe walls externally reinforced with polypropylene grids. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  22. Turanli L, Saritas A (2011) Strengthening the structural behavior of adobe walls through the use of plaster reinforcement mesh. Constr build Mater 25(4):1747–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu F, Gang L, Hong-nan L, Jin-qing J (2013) Strength and stress-strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Mater Struct 46(9):1449–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ATC, FEMA (1998) Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: basic procedures manual. FEMA 306, Redwood City

  25. ATC, FEMA (1998) Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: technical resources. FEMA 307, Redwood City

  26. Bosiljkov V, Page AW, Bokan-Bosiljkov V, Zarnic R (2010) Evaluation of the seismic performance of brick masonry walls. Struct Control Health 17:100–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S (2009) In-plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:243–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Magenes G, Calvi GM (1997) In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1097–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abrams DP, Shah N (1992) Cyclic loading testing of unreinforced masonry walls, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana, Advanced Construction Technology Center Report #92-26-10

  30. Anthoine A, Magonette G, Magenes G (1995) Shear-compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th european conference on earthquake engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  31. Magenes G, Calvi GM (1992) Cyclic behavior of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of 10th european conference on earthquake engineering, Duma, The Netherlands

  32. Magenes G, Calvi GM (1992) Cyclic Behavior flexural cracking/diagonal shear of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th european conference on earthquake engineering, Duma, The Netherlands

  33. Tomazevic M (2009) Shear resisitance of masonry walls and Eurocode 6: shear versus tensile strength of masonry. Mater Struct 42:889–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tomazevic M, Klemenc I (1997) Seismic behavior of confined masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1059–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paulay T, Priestley MSN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry building. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Russell AP, Elwood KJ, Ingham JM (2014) Lateral force-displacement response of unreinforced masonry wall with flanges. J Struct Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000863

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vladimir GH, Graca V, Paulo BL (2010) Experimental analysis of reinforced concrete block masonry walls subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. J Struct Eng 136(4):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. ASCE, FEMA (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356, Washington, DC

  39. Bo-long Z, Ming-shun W, Zhi-xian J (1980) Experimental study on basic behavior of brick masonry under reversed loading. J Tongji Univ 2:1–14 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shedid MT, EI-Dakhakhni WW, Drysdale RG (2009) Behavior of fully grouted reinforced concrete masonry shear walls failing in flexure: analysis. Eng Struct 31:2032–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, F., Wang, HT., Li, G. et al. Seismic performance of traditional adobe masonry walls subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 50, 69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0927-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0927-0

Keywords

Navigation