Skip to main content

The geotechnical and microstructural properties of desilicated fly ash lime stabilised expansive soil

Abstract

This study presents the use of marginal material as a stabiliser for expansive soil and therefore provides opportunity for high volume use of waste material for low cost, low volume road construction. Desilicated fly ash (DFA) was stabilised with lime up to 40 %. The effect of composite moisture content, lime content and curing temperature was studied. A 70:30 DFA:lime composite cured at 80 °C for 96 h had the highest unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 8.57 MPa, a 19.5 % water absorption after a 24 h soak with a corresponding 23.5 % reduction in UCS. The green composite (70:30) was then used to stabilise expansive soil. Expansive soil stabilised with 30 % 70:30 DFA: lime composite was found to have a UCS of 4.1 MPa and resulted in a 50.1 % reduction in the liquid limit and a 15.1 meq/100 g reduction in cation exchange capacity of the soil. The formation of calcium silicate hydrate and tricalcium aluminate in the expansive soil was responsible for the strength gain in the stabilised soil. The stabilised soil met the minimum requirements for the American Concrete institute’s requirements for rigid pavement layers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    American Concrete Institute (1990) State-of-the-art report on soil cement. ACI Mater J 87:23

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Al-Mukhtar M, Lasledj A, Alcover J (2010) Behaviour and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 20°C. Appl Clay Sci 50:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anderson M, Jones MR, McCarthy MJ (2008) Established uses of combustion residues. In: Cox M, Nugteren H, Janssen-Jurkovicova M (eds) Combustion residues, current, novel & renewable applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 85–136

  4. 4.

    ASTM C67 (2014) Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    ASTM B822 (2010) Standard test method for particle size distribution of metal powders and related compounds by light scattering. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    ASTM D2487 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    ASTM D4318 (2010) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    ASTM D5102 (2009) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of compacted soil-lime mixtures. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    ASTM D5550 (2014) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by gas pycnometer. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    ASTM D5890 (2011) Standard test method for swell index of clay mineral component of geosynthetic clay liners. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bagheri Y, Ahmad F, Ashraf M, Ismail M (2014) Strength and mechanical behavior of soil–cement–lime–rice husk ash (soil–CLR) mixture. Mater Struct 47:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Buttress AJ, Grenfel JA, Airey GD (2015) Accelerated swell testing of artificial sulfate bearing lime stabilised cohesive soils. Mater Struct 48:3635–3655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen C, Gong W, Lutze W, Pegg IL, Zhai J (2011) Kinetics of fly ash leaching in strongly alkaline solutions. J Mater Sci 46:590–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Miranda T, Oliveira D, Silva R (2012) Soil stabilisation using alkaline activation of fly ash for self compacting rammed earth construction. Constr Build Mater 36:727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Eades JL, Grim RE (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for soil stabilization. Highway Res Rec 139:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Falayi T, Ntuli F, Okonta FO (2015) Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of silica leaching from Camden power station fly ash, at the 4th International conference on Energy systems, environment, entrepreneurship and innovation (ICESEEI), pp 241–248, Dubai, 22–24 Feb 2015

  17. 17.

    Guidelines for Road Construction Materials (1985) Committee of State Road Authorities: Draft TRH 14:1–57

  18. 18.

    Hilt GH, Davidson DT (1960) Lime fixation in clayey soils. Highw Res Board Bull 262:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Horpibulsukn H, Phetchuay C, Chinkulkijniwat A, Cholaphatsorn A (2013) Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Soils Found 53:477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jo HY, Katsumi T, Benson CH, Edil TB (2001) Hydraulic conductivity and swelling of nonprehydrated GCLs permeated with single-species salt solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Khemissa M, Mahamedi A (2014) Cement and lime mixture stabilization of an expansive overconsolidated clay. Appl Clay Sci 95:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton DR (2011) Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 41:1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee JM, Shackelford CD (2005) Impact of bentonite quality on hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mattias P, Maura G, Rinaldi G (1989) Investigation of reactions in high-alumina fly ash and lime pastes. Mater Struct 22:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    McCarthy MJ, Csetenyi LJ, Sachdeva A, Dhir RK (2014) Engineering and durability properties of fly ash treated lime-stabilised sulphate-bearing soils. Eng Geol 174:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McCarthy MJ, Csetenyi LJ, Sachdeva A, Dhir RK (2012) Fly ash influences on sulfateheave in lime-stabilised soils. Ground Improv 153:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Millogo Y, Morel JC (2012) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of cement stabilised adobes. Mater Struct 45:1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Millogo Y, Morel JC, Traoré K, Ouedraogo R (2011) Microstructure, geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of quicklime-lateritic gravels mixtures used in road construction. Constr Build Mater 26:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Modarres M, Nosoudy YM (2015) Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime: technical and environmental impacts. Appl Clay Sci. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.026

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mitchell JK, Soga K (1976) Fundamentals of soil behaviour. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    National Cooperative Highway Research Program (2009) Recommended practice for stabilization of subgrade soils and base materials 148:1–52

  32. 32.

    Ntuli F, Lewis AE (2009) Kinetic modelling of nickel powder precipitation by high-pressure hydrogen reduction. Chem Eng Sci 64:2202–2215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pietersen HS (1993) Reactivity of fly ash and slag in cement. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology

  34. 34.

    Rao SM, Asha K (2012) Activation of fly ash-lime reactions: kinetic approach. J Mater Civil Eng 24:1110–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Reddy BVV, Jagadish KS (1993) The static compaction of soils. Géotechnique 43:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Reddy BVV, Hubli SR (2002) Properties of lime stabilised steam-cured blocks for masonry. Mater Struct 35:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Reddy BVV, Gourav K (2011) trength of lime–fly ash compacts using different curing techniques and gypsum additive. Mater Struct 44:1793–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shackelford CD, Benson CH, Katsumi T, Edil TB, Lin L (2000) Evaluation the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids. Geotext Geomembr 18:133–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    South African Institute for Engineering and Environmental Geologists (2000) A short workshop on suggested interpretation techniques of soil movement. Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    South African Department of Public Works (2007) Identification of problematic soils in Southern Africa. Technical notes for civil and structural engineers. Engineering manual for problematic soils in Southern Africa, South Africa

  41. 41.

    Szendefy J (2013) Impact of the soil-stabilization with lime. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, pp 2601–2604

  42. 42.

    Wang Q, Tang AN, Cui Y, Delage P, Gatmiri B (2012) Experimental study on the swelling behaviour of bentonite/claystone mixture. Eng Geol 124:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Williams AAB, Pidgeon T (2005) Problem soils in South Africa-State of the art: expansive soils. The Civil Eng in S Afr 27(7):367–407

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yilmaz Y (2015) Compaction and strength characteristics of fly ash and fiber amendedclayey soil. Eng Geol 188:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University Research Council of the University of Johannesburg for their financial support. The authors are also thankful to the National Research Foundation of South Africa for providing a bursary for the student.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. N. Okonta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falayi, T., Okonta, F.N. & Ntuli, F. The geotechnical and microstructural properties of desilicated fly ash lime stabilised expansive soil. Mater Struct 49, 4881–4891 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0831-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Desilcated fly ash
  • Durability
  • Saturation coefficient
  • Cation exchange capacity
  • Hydration