Abstract
Restoration of historic buildings is often executed using lime mortars. A restoration mortar is considered compatible with the original building materials when it answers to certain criteria, such as the facilitation of moisture transport. This can be determined by studying porosity, permeability, and the pore size distribution of both materials. Since NHL mortars are used in restoration of the exterior, where water and moisture are ever-present, a good characterization in terms of their pore-related properties is necessary. This study therefore researched characteristics of pure NHL mortars, without metakaolin or pozzolan additives. In this study, 16 different mortar recipes were made with NHL 5, the most hydraulic NHL type. The mortars had variations in spread, sand type and grain size. The sand types varied from coarse-grained to very fine, in order to be able to study the influence of the largest and smallest grains. The spread was adapted from 120 to 180 mm by changing the water:binder ratio. This allows understanding the influence of binding water on these pore-related properties. The measured pore-related properties were linked to compressive strength measurements, so as to characterize these eminently hydraulic limes also on a mechanical level. Nearly 180 samples were tested after 90 days of curing. All mortars show a bimodal pore size distribution. Depending on the sand type and the mortar spread, the mechanical strength varied from 1 to 10 MPa and pore sizes varied from the larger to smaller pore region. This demonstrates the large influence aggregates and water have on the properties of the hardened mortar. In general, the influence of the variation in water:binder ratio was less apparent, although an excess of binding water was translated into a change towards smaller pores, higher porosity and lower compressive strength. This study demonstrates that NHL 5 lime can be a good binder for restoration mortars, in which the properties of the mortar can be adapted through variation of aggregate grain size and spread. This allows researching a possible estimation of properties before making the mortars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P, Bakolas A, Karatasios I, Kilikoglou V (2005) Hydraulic lime mortars for the restoration of historic masonry in Crete. Cem Concr Res 35:1577–1586. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.001
Tunçoku SS, Caner-Saltık EN (2006) Opal-A rich additives used in ancient lime mortars. Cem Concr Res 36:1886–1893. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.06.012
Schueremans L, Cizer Ö, Janssens E, Serré G, Van Balen K (2011) Characterization of repair mortars for the assessment of their compatibility in restoration projects: research and practice. Constr Build Mater 25:4338–4350. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.008
André M, Phalip B, Voldoire O, Roussel E, Vautier F, Morel D (2012) Quantitative assessment of post-restoration accelerated stone decay due to compatibility problems (St. Sebastian’s abbey church, Manglieu, French Massif Central). In: 12th international congress deterioration and conservation of stone, New York
Mosquera MJ, Silva B, Prieto B, Ruiz-Herrera E (2006) Addition of cement to lime-based mortars: effect on pore structure and vapor transport. Cem Concr Res 36:1635–1642. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.041
Mosquera M, Benítez D, Perry S (2002) Pore structure in mortars applied on restoration: effect on properties relevant to decay of granite buildings. Cem Concr Res 32:1883–1888
Arandigoyen M, Alvarez JI (2007) Pore structure and mechanical properties of cement–lime mortars. Cem Concr Res 37:767–775. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.023
Pavía S, Toomey B (2007) Influence of the aggregate quality on the physical properties of natural feebly-hydraulic lime mortars. Mater Struct 41:559–569. doi:10.1617/s11527-007-9267-4
Isebaert A, Van Parys L, Cnudde V (2014) Composition and compatibility requirements of mineral repair mortars for stone—a review. Constr Build Mater 59:39–50. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.020
Rodrigues JD, Grossi A (2007) Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions. J Cult Herit 8:32–43. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2006.04.007
Sasse HR, Snethlage R (1997) Methods for the evaluation of stone conservation treatments.pdf. In: Baer NS, Snethlage R (eds) Dahlem workshop saving our architectural heritage: the conservation of historic stone structures. Wiley, New York, pp 223–43
Torney C, Forster AM, Szadurski EM (2014) Specialist restoration mortars for stone elements: a comparison of the physical properties of two stone repair materials. Herit Sci 2:1–12. doi:10.1186/2050-7445-2-1
Schueremans L, Van Balen K, Cizer O, Janssens E, Serré G, Elsen J et al (2010) Compatibility of repair mortars in restoration projects. In: 8th international mason conference, Dresden, pp 785–94
Lawrence RM, Mays TJ, Rigby SP, Walker P, D’Ayala D (2007) Effects of carbonation on the pore structure of non-hydraulic lime mortars. Cem Concr Res 37:1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.011
Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Huertas MO (2005) Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: mineralogical and textural changes. Cem Concr Res 35:2278–2289. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.12.012
Arizzi A, Cultrone G (2012) The difference in behaviour between calcitic and dolomitic lime mortars set under dry conditions: the relationship between textural and physical–mechanical properties. Cem Concr Res 42:818–826. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.008
Kaufmann J, Loser R, Leemann A (2009) Analysis of cement-bonded materials by multi-cycle mercury intrusion and nitrogen sorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 336:730–737. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.029
Baroghel-Bouny V (2007) Water vapour sorption experiments on hardened cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 37:414–437. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.019
Loosveldt H, Lafhaj Z, Skoczylas F (2002) Experimental study of gas and liquid permeability of a mortar. Cem Concr Res 32:1357–1363. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00793-7
McCarter W, Starrs G, Chrisp T (2000) Electrical conductivity, diffusion, and permeability of Portland cement-based mortars. Cem Concr Res 30:1395–1400. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00281-7
Sanjuan M, Muñoz-Martialay R (1996) Influence of the water/cement ratio on the air permeability of concrete. J Mater Sci 31:2829–2832
Hamami AA, Turcry P, Aït-Mokhtar A (2012) Influence of mix proportions on microstructure and gas permeability of cement pastes and mortars. Cem Concr Res 42:490–498. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.019
Kalagri A, Karatasios I, Kilikoglou V (2014) The effect of aggregate size and type of binder on microstructure and mechanical properties of NHL mortars. Constr Build Mater 53:467–474. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.111
Cizer O, Balen K Van, Gemert D Van, Elsen J. Blended lime–cement mortars for conservation purposes: microstructure and strength development, vol 2. In: 6th international conference structural analysis historic construction preservation safety significance. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Bath, pp 965–972
Pavia S, Brennan O (2013) Portland cement–lime mortars for conservation. In: 3rd historic mortars conference, vol 1, Glasgow, pp 1–10
Silva BA, Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A (2014) Influence of natural hydraulic lime content on the properties of aerial lime-based mortars. Constr Build Mater 72:208–218. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.010
Grilo J, Faria P, Veiga R, Santos Silva A, Silva V, Velosa A (2014) New natural hydraulic lime mortars—physical and microstructural properties in different curing conditions. Constr Build Mater 54:378–384. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.078
Bianco N, Calia A, Denotarpietro G, Negro P (2013) Hydraulic mortar and problems related to the suitability for restoration 1. Period Di Mineral 82:529–542. doi:10.2451/2013PM0031
Nichols G (2009) Sedimentology and stratigraphy, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Chang C-F, Chen J-W (2006) The experimental investigation of concrete carbonation depth. Cem Concr Res 36:1760–1767. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.025
Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.17.273
Hall C, Hoff WD (2011) Water transport in brick, stone and concrete, 2nd edn. Spon Press, New York
Lanas J, Pérez Bernal JL, Bello MA, Alvarez Galindo JI (2004) Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars. Cem Concr Res 34:2191–2201. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.005
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the technical support at the Civil Engineering and Structural Mechanics research group at the University of Mons as well as the technical support at Ghent University for the preparation of the mortar samples and assistance with the tests. The special research fund of Ghent University is acknowledged for the Ph.D. scholarship of W. De Boever.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isebaert, A., De Boever, W., Descamps, F. et al. Pore-related properties of natural hydraulic lime mortars: an experimental study. Mater Struct 49, 2767–2780 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0684-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0684-5