Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental study on the salt weathering resistance of fired clay bricks consolidated by ethyl silicate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fired clay elements are widely diffused in architectural heritage, for both structural and ornamental purposes, and are susceptible to severe decay forms, hence their conservation is a very urgent task, requiring appropriate consolidants to restore their cohesion and mechanical strength. As fired clay bricks and terracotta artefacts contain silicate fractions, allowing ethyl silicate (ES) to chemically bond to the substrate, ES is supposed to be suitable for their consolidation and indeed it is used in some conservation works on this kind of material. However, its behaviour and performance on fired clay elements has not been systematically evaluated in the scientific literature, mostly when durability is concerned. This aspect is particularly relevant as diverging data can be found in the literature about the impact of ES on substrate durability, to such an extent that it was found to either increase or hamper materials resistance to decay, depending on the specific case in exam. In this study, the behaviour towards salts crystallisation of fired clay bricks treated by ethyl silicate was investigated, specifically focussing on the role of the application procedure, an aspect which is usually left to the conservatorists’ skilfulness but which is however of paramount importance for the treatment outcome. In particular, ES was applied by five and ten brush strokes, to assess how the different amount of product absorbed and its different distribution inside the porous substrate influence the final resistance of bricks to salt weathering. As a matter of fact, salt crystallization is commonly considered one of the most frequent and severe decay mechanism affecting bricks on site. Despite both treatments providing significant increases in mechanical properties and a limited modification in samples microstructure, durability was found to be dependent on the treatment conditions. Particular attention should be devoted to the amount of product applied, as higher product absorption, despite generally leading to better efficacy, could cause higher microstructural modifications, possibly hampering materials durability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sassoni E, Graziani G, Franzoni E (2015) An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 1: effectiveness and compatibility in comparison with ethyl silicate. Constr Build Mater. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.026

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franzoni E, Pigino B, Leemann A, Lura P (2014) Use of TEOS for fired-clay bricks consolidation. Mater Struct 47(7):1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cultrone G, Madkour F (2013) Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment products in improving the quality of ceramics used in new and historical buildings. J Cult Herit 14(4):304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cultrone G, De La Torre MJ, Sebastián E, Cazalla O (2003) Evaluation of bricks durability using destructive and nondestructive methods (DT and NDT). Materiales de Construcción 53(269):41–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Hees RPJ, Brocken HJP (2004) Damage development to treated brick masonry in a long-term salt crystallisation test. Constr Build Mater 18(5):331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewat JM (1996) Approaches to the conservation of salt deteriorated brick. Masters thesis, University of Pennsylvania

  7. Franzoni E, Graziani G, Sassoni E, Bacilieri G, Griffa M, Lura P (2014) Solvent based TEOS consolidant for stone: influence of the application technique on penetration depth, efficacy and pore occlusion. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-014-0417-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scherer GW, Wheeler GS (2009) Silicate consolidants for stone. Key Eng Mater 391:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P, Kallithrakas-Kontos N, Korakaki D, Agioutantis Z, Maurigiannakis S (2006) Evaluation of silicon-based strengthening agents on porous limestones. Prog Org Coat 57:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DelgadoRodrigues J, Grossi A (2007) Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions. J Cult Herit 8:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Italian Reccomandation NORMAL 20/85, Conservazione dei materiali lapidei: Manutenzione ordinaria e straordinaria, 1985

  12. Sassoni E, Franzoni E, Pigino B, Scherer GW, Naidu S (2013) Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: comparison with a TEOS-based consolidant. J Cult Herit 14S:e103–e108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazzarini L, Laurenzi Tabasso M (1986) Il restauro della pietra. CEDAM, Padua (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sassoni E, Graziani G, Franzoni E (2015) An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 2: durability in comparison with ethyl silicate. Constr Build Mater (submitted)

  15. Sassoni E, Franzoni E (2014) Influence of porosity on artificial deterioration of marble and limestone by heating. Appl Phys A 115(3):809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sassoni E, Franzoni E (2015) Consolidation of Carrara marble by hydroxyapatite and behaviour after thermal ageing. In: Toniolo L et al (eds) Built heritage: monitoring conservation management, research for development. Springer, Cham, pp 379–389. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08533-3_32

  17. Miliani C, Velo-Simpson ML, Scherer GW (2007) Particle-modified consolidants: a study on the effect of particles on sol–gel properties and consolidation effectiveness. J Cult Herit 8:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler G (2005) Alkoxysilanes and the consolidation of stone (research in conservation). The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naidu S, Liu C, Scherer GW (2015) New techniques in limestone consolidation: hydroxyapatite-based consolidant and the acceleration of hydrolysis of silicate-based consolidants. J Cult Herit. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2014.01.001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsui N, Flatt RJ, Scherer GW (2003) Crystallization damage by sodium sulfate. J Cult Herit 4:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Doehne E, Sebastian E (2000) How does sodium sulfate crystallize? Implications for the decay and testing of building materials. Cem Concr Res 30:1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valenza JJ II, Scherer GW (2007) A review of salt scaling: II. Mechanisms. Cem Concr Res 37:1022–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Flatt RJ (2002) Salt damage in porous materials: how high supersaturations are generated. J Cryst Growth 242:435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scherer GW (2004) Stress from crystallization of salts. Cem Concr Res 34:1613–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franzoni E, Graziani G, Sassoni E (2015) TEOS-based treatments for stone consolidation: acceleration of hydrolysis-condensation reactions by poulticing. J Sol-Gel Sci 74(2):398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Benavente D, García del Cura MA, Fort R, Ordóñez S (1999) Thermodynamic modelling of changes induced by salt pressure crystallisation in porous media of stone. J Cryst Growth 204:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Franzoni E (2014) Rising damp removal from historical masonries: a still open challenge. Constr Build Mater 54:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Francesco Sagripanti is kindly acknowledged for his collaboration on performing weathering cycles. Dr. Claudia Castelli and Dr. Veronica Zulli are acknowledged for their collaboration. Thanks to Dr. Alberto Fregni for his collaboration in the ion chromatography analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, Via Terracini 28, 40131, Bologna, Italy

    Gabriela Graziani, Enrico Sassoni & Elisa Franzoni

Authors
  1. Gabriela Graziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrico Sassoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisa Franzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Franzoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graziani, G., Sassoni, E. & Franzoni, E. Experimental study on the salt weathering resistance of fired clay bricks consolidated by ethyl silicate. Mater Struct 49, 2525–2533 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0665-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0665-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation