Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of factors affecting dynamic modulus and phase angle of various asphalt concrete mixtures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the dynamic response of various asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures subjected to sinusoidal loading. Eight AC mixtures (four wearing and four base course) were selected including (but not limited to): superpave, asphalt institute manual series, and dense bituminous macadam. The uniaxial dynamic modulus (|E*|) test at various temperatures (4.4–54.4 °C) and frequencies (0.1–25 Hz) was conducted using asphalt mixture performance tester. Statistical analysis of two-level factorial was employed to regulate the factors affecting the AC mixtures. The results revealed that an increase in temperature (from 21.1 to 37.8 °C), translated into 45 and 43 % drop in |E*| values on average while 80 and 67 % decrease in |E*| values was attributed to the sweep of frequency (from 25 to 0.1 Hz) for wearing and base course mixes, respectively. Non-linear regression model was developed to express the dynamic modulus as a function of test temperature, loading frequency and mixture volumetric parameter. Furthermore, Witczak model of dynamic modulus prediction was evaluated and the results indicated a close fit with an average under prediction error of 0.20. The study characterized and ranked the representative AC mixtures that could help in selecting the material/gradation for mechanistic-empirical pavement design approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO, TP 62-07 (2007) Standard test method for determining the dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC

  2. Abu Abdo AM (2012) Sensitivity analysis of a new dynamic modulus (|E*|) model for asphalt mixtures. Road Mater Pavement Design 13(3):549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apeagyei AK, Diefenderfer BK, Diefenderfer SD (2012) Development of dynamic modulus master curves for hot-mix asphalt with abbreviated testing temperature. Int J Pavement Eng 13(2):98–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Apeagyei AK (2011) Rutting as a function of dynamic modulus and gradation. J Mater Civ Eng 23(9):1302–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asphalt Institute (1997) Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types. Manual Series No. 2, (MS-2). Lexington

  6. Bayat AR, Knight M (2010) Investigation of hot-mix asphalt dynamic modulus by means of field-measured pavement response. J Transp Res Board 2154:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Benedetto H, Partl MN, Francken L, La Roche De, Saint André C (2001) Stiffness testing for bituminous mixtures. Mater Struct 34(2):66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonaquist RF, Christensen DW, Stump W (2003) Simple performance tester for superpave mix design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Report-513, TRB, Washington DC

  9. Biligiri KP, Way GB (2014) Predicted E* dynamic moduli of the Arizona mixes using asphalt binders placed over a 25-year period. Constr Build Mater 54(2):520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. BS EN. British Standard Specification 13801-1. (2006) Bituminous mixtures. Material specifications asphalt concrete. British Standard Institute, London

  11. Cho Y-H, Park D-W, Hwang S-D (2010) A predictive equation for dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures used in Korea. Constr Build Mater 24(1):513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clyne TR, Li X, Marasteanu MO, Engene K (2003) Dynamic modulus and resilient modulus of Mn/dot asphalt mixtures. Report: MN/RC–2003-09: Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul

  13. Contreras JN, Fresno DC, Zamanillo AV (2010) Dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture by ultrasonic direct test. NDT&E Int 43(1):629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cross SA, Jakatimath Y (2007) Determination of dynamic modulus master curves for Oklahoma HMA mixtures. Final report: Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma, USA

  15. El-Badawy S, Awed A, Bayomy F (2011) Evaluation of the MEPDG dynamic modulus prediction models for asphalt concrete mixtures. Transportation and Development Institute Congress 2011, pp 576–585

  16. El-Badawy S, Bayomy F, Awed A (2012) Performance of MEPDG dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt concrete mixtures: local calibration for Idaho. J Mater Civ Eng 24(11):1412–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1998) Strategic Highway Research Programme, Washington DC, USA

  18. Flintsch GW, Loulizi A, Diefenderfer BK (2007) Asphalt material characterization in support of implementation of mechanistic empirical pavement design guide. Virginia Transportation Research Council: Final report, report no. VTRC 07-CR10

  19. Gedafa DS, Hossain M, Romanoschi S, Gisi AJ (2010) Field verification of Superpave dynamic modulus. J Mater Civ Eng 22(5):485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Irfan M, Khurshid MB, Ahmed A, Labi S (2012) Scale and condition economies in asset preservation cost functions: case study involving flexible pavement treatments. J Transp Eng 138(2):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassan HF, Al-Jabri K (2011) Laboratory evaluation of hot-mix asphalt concrete containing copper slag aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 23(6):879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hossain N, Singh D, Zaman M (2013) Dynamic modulus-based field rut prediction model from an instrumented pavement section. Procedia—Social Behav Sci 104:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khattab AM, El-Badawy SM, Al Hazmi A, Elmwafi M (2014) Evaluation of Witczak E* predictive models for the implementation of AASHTOWare-pavement ME design in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Constr Build Mater 64:360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar SA, Veeraragavan A (2011) Dynamic mechanical characterization of asphalt concrete mixes with modified asphalt binders. Mater Sci Eng A 528(21):6445–6454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarthy PS (2001) Transportation economics-theory and practice: a case study approach. Black well Publishers, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. NCHRP Final report 1-37A, TRB; Washington DC, USA

  27. National Highway Authority (NHA) (1998) General Specifications. NHA Head Quarters, 27 Mauve Area, G-9/1, Islamabad, Pakistan

  28. PASW Statistics 18. Predictive Analytics Software (formerly SPSS Statistics) (2012) SPSS Inc. Headquarters, Chicago. http://www.spss.com/softwares/statistics/statistics/statistics-base

  29. Plati C, Georgouli K, Loizos A (2013) Asphalt concrete stiffness modulus estimation utilizing an algorithm approach. Airfield Highway Pavement 2013:1219–1228

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shu X, Huang B (2008) Micromechanics-based dynamic modulus prediction of polymeric asphalt concrete mixtures. Composites B 39(4):704–713

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Shu X, Huang B (2009) Predicting dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures with differential method. Road Mater Pavement Design 10(2):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ye Q, Wu S, Li N (2009) Investigation of dynamic and fatigue properties of fiber- modified asphalt mixtures. Int J Fatigue 31(10):1598–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. You Z, Adhikari S, Kutay ME (2009) Dynamic modulus simulation of the asphalt concrete using the X-ray computed tomography images. Mater Struct 42:617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu H, Shen S (2011) Impact of aggregate packing on dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt mixtures using three-dimensional discrete element method. Constr Build Mater 26(3):302–309

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu H, Sun L, Yang J, Chen Z, Gu W (2011) Developing master curves and predicting dynamic modulus of polymer-modified asphalt mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng 23(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li J, Zofka A, Yut I (2012) Evaluation of dynamic modulus of typical asphalt mixtures in Northeast US region. Road Mater Pavement Design 13(2):249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by National Highway Authority (NHA) through Highway Training and Research Center (HRTC) and was part of research project titled “Improvement of asphalt mix design technology for Pakistan” under collaboration agreement with National University of Sciences and Technology. The technical support and financial assistance provided by NHA, staff/officials HRTC, and NUST is hereby acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Irfan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, Y., Irfan, M., Ahmed, S. et al. Investigation of factors affecting dynamic modulus and phase angle of various asphalt concrete mixtures. Mater Struct 49, 857–868 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0544-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0544-3

Keywords

Navigation