Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of water/powder ratio and powder type on alkali–silica reactivity and transport properties of self-consolidating concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The type and amount of filler are amongst the most important parameters influencing rheological, mechanical and durability characteristics of self consolidating concrete (SCC). Influence of using a limestone powder, the filler portion of reactive basalt filler and a type of class C fly ash on the fresh properties, alkali–silica reactivity and transport properties were investigated in this study. For this purpose, six SCC mixtures having three filler types and two water/powder ratios were prepared. Alkali–silica reactivity was evaluated by conducting RILEM AAR-3 (38 °C) and AAR-4 (60 °C) concrete prism tests. Besides, the mixtures were exposed to permeable void content, sorptivity and chloride ion permeability tests in order to evaluate the transport properties. According to the results, using a high amount of powder from a reactive basalt in SCC mixture led to the highest expansion level and poor transport properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okamura H, Ouchi M (2003) Self-Compacting Concrete, Invited Paper. J Adv Concr Technol 1(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi YW, Kim YJ, Shin HC, Moon HY (2006) An experimental research on the fluidity and mechanical properties of high-strength lightweight self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 36:1595–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouwers HJH, Radix HJ (2005) Self-compacting concrete: theoretical and experimental study. Cem Concr Res 35:2116–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siddique R, Aggarwal P, Aggarwal Y (2012) Influence of water/powder ratio on strength properties of self-compacting concrete containing coal fly ash and bottom ash. Const Build Mater 29:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nepomucenoa M, Oliveiraa L, Lopes SMR (2012) Methodology for mix design of the mortar phase of self-compacting concrete using different mineral additions in binary blends of powders. Const Build Mater 26:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Felekoglu B (2007) Utilisation of high volumes of limestone quarry wastes in concrete industry (self-compacting concrete case). Resour Conserv Recycl 51:770–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu W, Gibbs JC (2005) Use of different limestone and chalk powders in self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 35:1457–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahmaran M, Christianto HA, Yaman IO (2006) The effect of chemical admixtures and mineral additives on the properties of self-compacting mortars. Cem Concr Compos 28:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ye G, Liu X, De Schutter G, Poppe AM, Taerwe L (2007) Influence of limestone powder used as filler in SCC on hydration and microstructure of cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos 29:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu M (2010) Self-compacting concrete with different levels of pulverized fuel ash. Const Build Mater 24:1245–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gesoglu M, Guneyisi E, Kocabag ME, Bayram V, Mermerdas K (2012) Fresh and hardened characteristics of self compacting concretes made with combined use of marble powder, limestone filler, and fly ash. Const Build Mater 37:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouzoubaa N, Lachemi M (2001) Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash Preliminary results. Cem Concr Res 31:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sonebi M (2004) Medium strength self-compacting concrete containing fly ash: modelling using factorial experimental plans. Cem Concr Res 34:1199–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khatib JM (2008) Performance of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash. Const Build Mater 22:1963–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang MH (1995) Microstructure, crack propagation and mechanical properties of cement pastes containing high volumes of fly ashes. Cem Concr Res 25(6):1165–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boel V, Poppe AM, Ye G, De Schutter G (2007) Microstructure of self-compacting concrete, Durability of self-compacting concrete—state-of-the-art Report of RILEM Technical Committee 205-DSC, Editors: G De Schutter and K Audenaert, 11–39

  17. Jianxiong C, Xincheng P, Yubin H (1999) A study of self-compacting HPC with superfine sand and pozzolanic additives, Proceedings of the 1st international RILEM symposium, Edited by A.Skarendahl and O. Petersson, 549–560

  18. Felekoglu B (2003) Investigation on mechanical and physical properties of SCC, M.Sc. Thesis in civil engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, (in Turkish)

  19. Mohammed MK, Dawson AR, Thom NH (2013) Production, microstructure and hydration of sustainable self-compacting concrete with different types of filler. Const Build Mater 49:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laibao L, Yunsheng Z, Wenhua Z, Zhiyong L, Lihua Z (2013) Investigating the influence of basalt as mineral admixture on hydration and microstructure formation mechanism of cement. Const Build Mater 48:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Uysal M, Sumer M (2011) Performance of self-compacting concrete containing different mineral admixtures. Const Build Mater 25:4112–4120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. EFNARC (2002) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. EFNARC, UK

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poole AB (1992) Introduction to alkali-aggregate reaction. In: Swamy RN (ed) The alkali–silica reaction in concrete, Blackie, Glasgow and London, and Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, pp 1–29

  24. Thomas M, Fournier B, Folliard K, Ideker J, Shehata M (2006) Test methods for evaluating preventive measures for controlling expansion due to alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cem Concr Res 36:1842–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindgård J, Andiç-Çakır Ö, Fernandes I, Rønning TF, Thomas MDA (2012) Alkali–silica reactions (ASR): literature review on parameters influencing laboratory performance testing. Cem Concr Res 42:223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. RILEM, AAR-3 (2000) Detection of potential alkali-reactivity of aggregates—method for aggregate combinations using concrete prisms. Mater Struct 33:290–293

  27. RILEM, AAR-4.1-Detection of potential alkali-reactivity of aggregates: accelerated (60 °C) concrete prism test (not published yet)

  28. Çopuroğlu O, Andiç-Çakir Ö, Broekmans MATM, Kühnel R (2009) Mineralogy, geochemistry and expansion testing of an alkali-reactive basalt from western Anatolia, Turkey. Mater Charact 60:756–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. EFNARC (2005) The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete, specification, production and use

  30. Lindgård J, Sellevold EJ, Thomas MDA, Pedersen B, Justnes H, Rønning TF (2013) Alkali–silica reaction (ASR)—performance testing: Influence of specimen pre-treatment, exposure conditions and prism size on concrete porosity, moisture state and transport properties. Cem Concr Res 53:145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM C642 (2013) Standard test method for density, absorption and voids in hardened concrete. American Society of Testing Materials

  32. ASTM C1585 (2004) Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. American Society of Testing Materials

  33. ASTM C 1202 (2005) Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration. American Society of Testing Materials

  34. Fournier B, Chevrier R, Grosbois M de, Lisella R, Folliard K, Ideker J, Shehata M, Thomas M, Baxter S (2004) The accelerated concrete prism test (60°C): variability of the test method and proposed expansion limits, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, Beijing, China, 1: 314–323

  35. Lindgård J, Nixon PJ, Borchers I, Schouenborg B, Wigum BJ, Haugen M, Åkesson U (2010) The EU “PARTNER” Project—European standard tests to prevent alkali reactions in aggregates: Final results and recommendations. Cem Concr Res 40:611–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lindgård J, Thomas MDA, Sellevold EJ, Pedersen B, Andiç-Çakır Ö, Justnes H, Rønning TF (2013) Alkali–silica reaction (ASR)—performance testing: Influence of specimen pre-treatment, exposure conditions and prism size on alkali leaching and prism expansion. Cem Concr Res 53:68–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rivard P, Bérubé MA, Ollivier JP, Ballivy G (2007) Decrease of pore solution alkalinity in concrete tested for alkali-silica reaction. Mater Struct 40:909–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Diamond S, Thaulow N (1974) A study of expansion due to alkali—silica reaction as conditioned by the grain size of the reactive aggregate. Cem Concr Res 4:591–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Multon S, Cyr M, Sellier A, Diederich P, Petit L (2010) Effects of aggregate size and alkali content on ASR expansion. Cem Concr Res 40:508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pedersen B (2004) Alkali-reactive and inert fillers in concrete, Rheology of fresh mixtures and expansive reactions, PhD-thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, p. 292

  41. Shafaatiana SMH, Akhavan A, Maraghechi H, Rajabipour F (2013) How does fly ash mitigate alkali–silica reaction (ASR) in accelerated mortar bar test (ASTM C1567)? Cem Concr Compod 37:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomas M, Dunster A, Nixon P, Blackwell B (2011) Effect of fly ash on the expansion of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction—Exposure site studies. Cem Concr Compod 33:359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramyar K, Copuroglu O, Andic O, Fraaij ALA (2004) Comparison of alkali–silica reaction products of fly-ash- or lithium-salt-bearing mortar under long-term accelerated curing. Cem Concr Res 34:1179–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaze ME, Nixon PJ (1983) The effect of pfa upon alkali-aggregate reaction. Mag Concr Res 35(123):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shehata MH, Thomas MDA (2000) The effect of fly ash composition on the expansion of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction. Cem Concr Res 30:1063–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hobbs DW (1988) Alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Hobbs DW (1986) Deleterious expansion of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction: influence of PFA and slag. Mag Concr Res 38(137):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. ASTM C311-04 (2004) Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use in Portland-cement concrete. American Society of Testing Materials

  49. Zhu W, Bartos PJM (2003) Permeation properties of self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 33:921–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under grant no. 110M569 and EBILTEM under grant no. 2012-BIL-023 are greatly acknowledged. Scholarship support from Turkish Cement Manufacturers Association is also gratefully acknowledged by the main author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özge Andiç-Çakır.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yüksel, C., Mardani-Aghabaglou, A., Beglarigale, A. et al. Influence of water/powder ratio and powder type on alkali–silica reactivity and transport properties of self-consolidating concrete. Mater Struct 49, 289–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0497-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0497-y

Keywords

Navigation