Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential for significantly improving performances of oil-well cement by soap-free emulsions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emulsions can improve the performance of cement or concrete, such as toughness and cementing strength and anti-permeability, so the emulsion cements have been of great scientific and technological interest for oil-well cementing. In this paper, a soap-free emulsion was synthesized utilizing anionic reactive emulsifiers and can be used in the oil-well cement system. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was applied to test the presence of copolymers. Transmission electron microscopy was used to study the structure of the nano-particles. The stability of the soap-free emulsion and the conventional emulsion against presence of additives (such as acid, alkali, salt, alcohol and the filtrate of cement slurry) was compared. The result indicated some characteristics of the soap-free emulsion. The particles of the soap-free emulsion were uniform and monodisperse. The minimum film-forming temperature and glass transition temperature (T g) of the soap-free emulsion were lower than that of the conventional emulsion. Compared with the conventional emulsion, the soap-free emulsion had a better stability against additives. When the soap-free emulsion was used in oil-well cement system, the emulsion could effectively control the free water and filtration of the cement slurry. The plastic deformation of the emulsion cement was higher than that of blank cement paste. It could be expected that the soap-free emulsion is suitable for application in oil-well cement.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohama Y (1997) Recent progress in concrete–polymer composites. Adv Cem Based Mater 5(1):31–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakayama M, Beaudoin JJ (1987) Bond strength development between latex-modified cement paste and steel. Cem Concr Res 17(4):562–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang ZX, Shi XM, Creighton AT, Peterson MM (2009) Effect of styrene-butadiene rubber latex on the chloride permeability and microstructure of Portland cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 23(6):2283–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hua WD, Jiang HY, Zhou ZX (2012) Resistance to hydrochloric acid corrosion of latex modified sulphoaluminate cement mortar. Appl Mech Mater 174–177:1372–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang R, Li XG, Wang PM (2006) Influence of polymer on cement hydration in SBR-modified cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 36(9):1744–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu HL, Saniger JM (1992) Characterization of the mechanical properties of polyacrylic acid-metal oxide concretes. Mater Lett 14(2–3):83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang R, Wang PM, Yao LJ (2012) Effect of redispersible vinyl acetate and versatate copolymer powder on flexibility of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 27(1):259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggarwal LK, Thapliyal PC, Karade SR (2007) Properties of polymer-modified mortars using epoxy and acrylic emulsions. Constr Build Mater 21(2):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramli M, Tabassi AA (2012) Effects of polymer modification on the permeability of cement mortars under different curing conditions: a correlational study that includes pore distributions, water absorption and compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 28(1):561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang R, Wang PM (2010) Function of styrene-acrylic ester copolymer latex in cement mortar. Mater Struct 43(4):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossignolo JA, Agnesini MVC (2002) Mechanical properties of polymer-modified light weight aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Res 32(3):329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baghini MS, Ismail A, Karim MR, Shokri F, Firoozi AA (2014) Effect of styrene-butadiene copolymer latex on properties and durability of road base stabilized with Portland cement additive. Constr Build Mater 68:740–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshihiko O, Ota M (2013) Recent trends in research and development activities of polymer-modified paste, mortar and concrete in Japan. Adv Mater Res 687:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Merlin F, Guitouni H, Mouhoubi H, Mariot S, Vallée F, Van Damme H (2005) Adsorption and heterocoagulation of nonionic surfactants and latex particles on cement hydrates. J Colloid Interface Sci 281(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Plank J, Gretz M (2008) Study on the interaction between anionic and cationic latex particles and Portland cement. Colloids Surf A 330(2–3):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang T, Shang S, Yin F (2001) Adsorptive behavior of surfactants on surface of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 31(7):1009–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pei MS, Kim W, Hyung W, Ango AJ, Soh Y (2002) Effects of emulsifiers on properties of poly(styrene-butyl acrylate) latex-modified mortars. Cem Concr Res 32(6):837–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aslamazova T, Tauer K (2004) On the colloidal stability of polystyrene particles prepared with surface-active initiators. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 104:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ali RM, Mahdi A (2004) Investigation into the effect of carboxylic acid monomer on particle nucleation and growth in emulsifier-free emulsion copolymerization of styrene-butadiene-aerylic acid. Polymer 45(10):3233–3239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mouaziz H, Larsson A, Sherrington DC (2004) One-step batch synthesis of high solids monodisperse styrene/glycidyl methacrylate and styrene/methacrylic acid emulsion copolymers. Macromolecules 37(4):1319–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin N, Chen K, Kang W (2006) Preparation of BA/ST/AM nano-particles by ultrasonic emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization. Ultrason Sonochem 13(4):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu ZS, Yi CF, Lu GH, Zhang JZ, Cheng SY (1997) Styrene-butyl acrylate-N, N-dimethyl N-butyl N-methacrylamidino propyl ammonium bromide emulsifier-free emulsion copolymerization. Polym Int 44(2):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo TY, Song MD, Zhou QY, Zhang BH, Ma JB, He BL (1998) Semibatch emulsifier-free emulsion copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and n-butyl acrylate in the presence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Chin Chem Lett 9(7):683–686

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng F, Sun ZW, Wu SZ, Liu XX, Wang ZY, Tong Z (2002) Preparation of highly charged, monodisperse nanospheres. Macromol Chem Phys 203(4):673–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai MM, Zhang YH, He PX (2011) Preparation and characterization of stable and high solid content St/BA emulsifier-free latexes in the presence of AMPS. J Polym Bull 67:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang GL, Song MD, Hao GH, Guo T, Zhang BH (2001) Studies on the preparation of stable and high solid content emulsifier-free latexes and characterization of the obtained copolymers for MMA/BA system with the addition of AHPS. J Appl Polym Sci 79(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao BJ, Wang XP, Li YB (2005) Studies on the sinetics of sodium styrenesulfonate polymerization and the copolymerization with acrylamide. Acta Polym Sin 3:453–457 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jevene AH, Cahalan PT, Coury AJ (1987) Refining of reaction grade 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid. US Patent 4650614

  29. Zhu XL, Jiang XB, Zhang ZG, Kong XZ (2008) Influence of ingredients in water-based polyurethane-acrylic hybrid latexes on latex properties. Prog Org Coat 62(3):251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aramendia E, Barandiaran MJ, Grade J (2005) Improving water sensitivity in acrylic films using surfmers. Langmuir 21(4):1428–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li G, He T, Hu D, Shi C (2012) Effects of two retarders on the fluidity of pastes plasticized with aminosulfonic acid-based superplasticizers. Constr Build Mater 26(1):72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee WJ, Jung HR, Lee MS, Kim JO, Yang KS (2003) Preparation and ionic conductivity of sulfonated-SEBS/SiO2/plasticizer composite polymer electrolyte for polymer battery. Solid State Ion 164:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller F, Ferreira CA, Franco L, Puiggalí J, Alemán C, Armelin E (2012) New sulfonated polystyrene and styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene block copolymers for applications in electrodialysis. J Phys Chem B 116:11767–11779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eric M (2001) Fluid loss control agents and compositions for cementing oil wells comprising said fluid loss control agent. US Patent 6180689 B1,2001-01-30

  35. Liu CJ, Huang ZB, Xu TT, Liu XL (2011) Oil and gas well cementing theory and applications. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, pp 176–178 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the “Twelve-Five” major national science and technology project (2011ZX05022-006-005HZ) from MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-bin Jiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiao, Lb., Chen, Dj., Feng, Dy. et al. Potential for significantly improving performances of oil-well cement by soap-free emulsions. Mater Struct 49, 279–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0495-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0495-0

Keywords

Navigation