Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the vertical acceleration component in the seismic response of masonry chimneys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many industrial sites around the world present out of service masonry chimneys frequently in a poor state of conservation. In most cases the industrial sites they belonged to have been surrounded by or transformed in new industrial, commercial or even residential buildings thus increasing their seismic risk. Several studies have dealt with the seismic assessment of masonry chimneys since the early 1990s analyzing the response of these structures subjected to horizontal ground motion with different constitutive laws for the masonry in tension and in compression. In this paper the attention is focused on the role that the vertical component of the ground motion plays on the overall stability of the masonry chimneys. Since the vertical self weight of the masonry provides a major stabilizing effect, its reduction due to downward seismic acceleration that acts almost simultaneously to the horizontal component should not be neglected in the seismic assessment. Analytical investigations on a simplified model and numerical analysis on a FE model of a real masonry chimney allowed to evaluate the importance of the vertical component of the ground motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACI: ACI 307–98 (1998) Standard practice for the design and construction of reinforced concrete chimneys. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan

  2. Angelides M (2011) The february 2010 earthquake in Chile, actual versus designed response of 2 concrete chimneys. CICIND REPORT 27(1):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breccolotti M, Materazzi AL (2008) Identification of a non-linear spring through the Fokker–Planck equation. Probab Eng Mech 23:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breccolotti M, Materazzi AL, Venanzi I (2008) Identification of the nonlinear behaviour of a cracked RC beam through the statistical analysis of the dynamic response. Struct Control Health Monit 15(3):416–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breymann G (1885) Trattato generale di costruzioni civili. Vallardi, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carydis P, Castiglioni C, Lekkas E, Kostaki I, Lebesis N, Drei A (2012) The Emilia Romagna, May 2012 earthquake sequence. The influence of the vertical earthquake component and related geoscientific and engineering aspects. Ingegneria Sismica 29(2–3):31–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. CEN: EN 1998–1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  8. CEN: EN 1993-3-2 (2006) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—Part 3–2: Towers, masts and chimneys Chimneys. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  9. CICIND (2001) Model code for concrete chimneys. CICIND, Zuerich, Switzerland

  10. Clough RW, Penzien J (2003) Dynamic of structure. Computers & Structures, Inc.

  11. D’Ambrisi A, Mariani V, Mezzi M (2012) Seismic assessment of a historical masonry tower with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses tuned on ambient vibration tests. Eng Struct 36:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Sarno L, Elnashai A, Manfredi G (2011) Assessment of RC columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions recorded during the 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake. Eng Struct 33:1514–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dogangun A, Acar R, Sezen H, Livaoglu R (2008) Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Facchini L, Betti M, Biagini P (2012) Seismic analysis of masonry towers. http://portale.unipa.it/meccanicadeimateriali/home/SM12-3-3.html. Accessed 4 April 2013

  15. Ghobarah A, Baumber T (1992) Seismic response and retrofit of industrial brick masonry chimneys. Can J Civil Eng 19(1):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gouilly A (1876) Théorie sur la stabilité des hautes cheminées en maçonnerie. J. Dejey, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huixian L, Housner GW, Lili X, Duxin H (2002) The Great Tangshan Earthquake of 1976. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechEERL:EERL.2002.001. Accessed 4 April 2013

  18. Kim S, Holub C, Elnashai A (2011) Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical earthquake motion on RC bridge piers. J Struct Eng 137(2):252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes V, Guedes JM, Pauperio E, Arede A, Costa A (2009) Ambient vibration testing and seismic analysis of a masonry chimney. J Build Appraisal 5(2):101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lourenço P (2006) Recommendations for restoration of ancient buildings and the survival of a masonry chimney. Constr Build Mater 20:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveira CS, Çakt E, Stengel D, Branco M (2012) Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: the case of historical Istanbul. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(1):19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pallarés FJ, Agüero A, Ivorra S (2009) A comparison of different failure criteria in a numerical seismic assessment of an industrial brickwork chimney. Mater Struct 42:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pallarés FJ, Agüero A, Martín M (2006) Seismic behaviour of industrial masonry chimneys. Int J Solids Struct 43:2076–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pallarés FJ, Ivorra S, Pallarés L, Adam JM (2011) State of the art of industrial masonry chimneys: a review from construction to strengthening. Constr Build Mater 25(12):4351–4361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papazoglou AJ, Elnashai AS (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(10):1109–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Riva P, Perotti F, Guidoboni E, Boschi E (1998) Seismic analysis of the Asinelli tower and earthquakes in Bologna. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17:525–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Salazar AR, Haldar A (2000) Structural responses considering the vertical component of earthquakes. Comput Struct 74:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto T, Maeda T (2008) Earthquake safety assessment of a tall brick chimney in Tokoname based on the micro-tremor measurement. Seismological Press of China, pp 73–80

  29. Zhao B, Taucer F, Rossetto T (2009) Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng Struct 31:1707–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors are grateful to Dr. Luca Leonardi and Dr. Federico Angelini Paroli of the consulting firm Agathos Engineering (Perugia, Italy) for their valuable support in organizing the experimental campaign.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Breccolotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breccolotti, M., Materazzi, A.L. The role of the vertical acceleration component in the seismic response of masonry chimneys. Mater Struct 49, 29–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0472-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0472-7

Keywords

Navigation