Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 1265–1271 | Cite as

Porosity–density relations in stone and brick materials

  • Christopher Hall
  • Andrea Hamilton
Original Article

Abstract

The open porosity of a specimen of stone or brick material is often measured using a gravimetric method based on Archimedes’ principle. This widely used technique also allows both the bulk density and the solid density of the specimen to be determined, although the solid density is not often reported. We discuss the relation between the porosity and density, both for single specimens and for groups of specimens of similar materials, using for illustration data on limestones, sandstones and fired-clay bricks. The significance of the solid density can be overlooked but it is informative both as a material property and as a method of identifying errors in data. We emphasize how the solid density depends on mineralogy and on closed porosity.

Keywords

Porosity Density Fired-clay brick Limestone Sandstone 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Maurice Rogers for drawing our attention to the data contained in the BRE stone list, and for useful discussions on British sandstones; Tim Yates (BRE) for providing new data on Ancaster limestone and information on test procedures; and Vicky Pugsley and Isobel Griffin for unpublished data.

References

  1. 1.
    Purdy RC, Moore JK (1907) Pyro-chemical and physical properties of clays. Trans Am Ceram Soc 9:204–318Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall C, Hoff WD and Prout W (1992) Sorptivity–porosity relations in clay brick ceramic. Am Ceram Soc Bull 71:1112–1116Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall C (1996) Clay brick. In: Jackson N, Dhir RK (Eds) Civil engineering materials, 5th edn. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall C, Hoff WD (2012) Water transport in brick, stone and concrete, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    BS EN 1936:2006 Natural stone test methods determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosityGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sitepu H (2009) Texture and structural refinement using neutron diffraction data from molybdite (MoO3) and calcite (CaCO3) powders and a Ni-rich Ni50.7Ti49.30 alloy. Powder Diffr 24:315–326Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Honeyborne DB (1982) The building limestones of France. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fronteau G, Schneider-Thomachot C, Chopin E, Barbin V, Mouze D, Pascal A (2010) Black-crust growth and interaction with underlying limestone microfacies. In Prikryl R, Torok A (eds) Natural stone resources for historical monuments, Geological Society Special Publication, London 333:25–34Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Ross KD, Butlin RN (1989) Durability tests for building stone, Building Research Establishment Report 141, BRE, Watford, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hurst VJ, Storch SP (1981) Regional variation in the cell dimensions of metamorphic quartz. Am Min 66:204–212Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis DH (1954) Estimating the porosity of sedimentary rocks from bulk density. J Geol 62:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunham AC (1992) Developments in industrial mineralogy: I. The mineralogy of brick-making. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 49:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunham AC, McKnight AS, Warren I (2001) Mineral assemblages formed in Oxford Clay fired under different time–temperature conditions with reference to brick manufacture. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 53:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prout W (1989) Studies of frost damage in masonry, PhD Thesis, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griffin IG, Hall C, Hamilton A (2013) Unusual water-transport properties of some traditional Scottish shale bricks. Mat Struct. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0149-7
  17. 17.
    Raimondo M, Dondi M, Gardini D, Guarini G, Mazzanti F (2009) Predicting the initial rate of water absorption in clay bricks. Constr Build Mater 23:2623–2630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM C373 (1994) Standard test method for water absorption, bulk density, apparent porosity, and apparent specific gravity of fired whiteware productsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM C329 (1994) Standard test method for specific gravity of fired ceramic whiteware materialsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamilton A, Hall C (2013) Mechanics of moisture-expansion cracking in fired-clay ceramics. J Phys D 46:092003Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roels S, Carmeliet J, Hens H, Adan O, Brocken H, Cerny R, Pavlik Z, Hall C, Kumaran K, Pel L, Plagge R (2004) Interlaboratory comparison of hygric properties of porous building materials. J Thermal Envel Build Sci 27:307–325Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lamb H (1928) Statics, including hydrostatics and the elements of the theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Courant R, John F (1974) Introduction to calculus and analysis, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lima FMS (2012) Using surface integrals for checking Archimedes’ law of buoyancy. Eur J Phys 33:101–113CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations