Skip to main content
Log in

R.C. beam to column connection failure assessment and limit state design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections have a fundamental role in determining the seismic performance of buildings. As a matter of fact, modern seismic codes impose a series of detailing provisions that try to prevent failure in beam–column joint, leading the failure to beam ductile plastic hinges. The complexity of the transferring of forces inside the joint makes the codes to adopt overestimated actions and underestimated resistance of this fundamental element of building frame. Moreover, a well designed joint gives a large amount of ductility that can’t be safely used because it can jeopardize the overall equilibrium when it dissipates through fragile mechanisms. Because of this complexity, unfortunately any clear consensus on methods for identifying their modes of failure hasn’t been found inside the scientific community. This paper wants to confirm a method for identifying connection failure mechanisms, which employs a number of indices relating to the connection resistance mechanisms that are determined solely from the connection mechanical and geometrical properties. The method here presented allows the identification of the specific mode of failure for an existing joint and adopts a correct design for a new joint. The method is validated against the results of 72 experimental tests carried out on beam–column connections sourced from the published literature, showing a quite accurate result. Test database considers connections designed with normal strength and high strength concrete and steel, but don’t consider tests carried on bad designed connections, i.e. those using plain bars, hooks, lack of shear reinforcement in beams. Finally a new joint capacity design approach, which aims to ensure good connection performance at the serviceability, damage limitation and ultimate limit states, is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACI 318 (2011) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, ACI Committee 318 Structural Building Code

  2. ACI 352 (2002) Recommendations for design of beam–column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures, Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352

  3. AIJ (1999) Standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures—based on allowable stress concept, Japan

  4. Eurocode 2, UNI EN 1992-1-1:2005, Design of concrete structures part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

  5. Eurocode 8, UNI EN 1998-1:2005 Eurocode 8—Design Of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

  6. New Zealand NZS 3101 (1982) Code of practice for the design of concrete structures, vol 1 and 2. Standard Association of New Zealand, Wellington

  7. Blakeley RWG, Edmons FD, Megget LM, Priestley MJN (1973) Behaviour of reinforced concrete external beam-column joints under cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of the 5th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 1, paper 88. Rome, Italy, pp 772–781

  8. Fardis MN (1994) R.C. frames under earthquake loading. CEB Bullettin d’Information

  9. Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings based on EN-Eurocode8. Springer, Dordrecht

  10. Filiatrault A, Pineau S, Houde J (1995) Seismic behavior of steel–fiber reinforced concrete interior beam–column joints. ACI Struct J 92(5):543–552

  11. Goto Y, Joh O (1996) An experimental study on shear failure mechanism of RC interior beam column joints. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. Sapporo, Japan

  12. Hakuto S, Park R, Tanada H (2000) Seismic load test on interior and exterior beam–column joints with substandard reinforcing details. ACI Struct J 97(1):11–25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong SG, Lee SG, Kang THK (2011) Deformation-based strut-and-tie model for interior joints of frames subject to load reversal. ACI Struct J 108(4):423–433

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang SJ, Lee HJ (2000) Analytical model for predicting shear strengths of interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints for seismic resistance. ACI Structural J 96(5):846–857

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joh O, Goto Y (2000) Beam–column joint behavior after beam yielding in R/C ductile frames. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. Auckland, New Zeland

  16. Kamimura T, Takeda S, Tochio M (2000) Influence of joint reinforcement on strength and deformation of interior beam–column subassemblages. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. Aukland, New Zeland

  17. Kim J, La Fave JM (2007) Key influence parameters for the joint shear behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) beam–column connections. Eng Struct 29:2523–2539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J, LaFave JM (2009) Joint shear behavior of reinforced concrete beam–column connections subjected to seismic lateral loading. NSEL Report Series Report No. NSEL-020, November

  19. Kitayama K, Otani S, Aoyama H (1987) Earthquake resistant design criteria for reinforced concrete interior beam column joints. In: Proceedings of the Pacific conference on earthquake engineering, vol 1. Warakei, New Zeland, 5–7 August, pp 315–326

  20. Kitayama K, Otani S, Aoyama H (1991) Development of design criteria for RC interior beam column joints. Design of beam–column joints for seismic resistance, ACI, Detroit, USA, pp 97–123

  21. Kitayama K, Lee S, Otani S, Aoyama H (1992) Behavior of high-strength R/C beam–column joints. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering. Rotterdam, Holland, pp 3151–3156

  22. Lee JY, Kim JY, Oh GJ (2009) Strength deterioration of reinforced concrete beam column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Eng Struct 31:2070–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li B, Tran C (2009) Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column joints with vertically distributed reinforcement. ACI Struct J 106(6):790–799

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noguchi H, Kurusu K. (1988) Correlation of bond and shear in RC beam-column connections subjected to seismic forces. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 597–602

  25. Noguchi H, Kashiwazaki T (1992) Experimental studies on shear performances of RC interior beam-column joints with high-strength materials. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering. Rotterdam, Holland, pp 3163–3168

  26. Oka Koji, Shiohara Hitoshi (1992) Tests of high strength concrete interior beam–column-joint subassemblages. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering. Rotterdam, pp 3211–3217

  27. Owada Y (2000) Three dimensional behaviors of reinforced concrete beam–column joint under seismic load. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. Aukland, New Zealand

  28. Pantelides CP, Okahashi Y, Reaveley LD (2008) Seismic rehabilitation of RC frame interior beam–column joints with FRP composites. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing, China

  29. Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Penelis GG, Kappos AJ (1997) Earthquake-resistant concrete structures. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pieretto A, Somma G, Somma G (2011) Studio delle modalità di collasso e calcolo delle deformazioni di nodi trave pilastro in c.a. University of Udine, Udine

    Google Scholar 

  32. Russo G, Somma G, Angeli P, Mitri D (2004) Contributi resistenti a taglio nei nodi Interni soggetti ad azione sismica. In: XI National Congress “Seismic Engineering in Italy”. Genova, Italy, pp 25–29

  33. Shiohara H (2001) New model for shear failure of RC interior beam–column connections. J Struct Eng 17(2):p152–p160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Somma G, Pieretto A, Rossetto T, Grant DN (2012) A new approach to evaluate failure behavior of reinforced concrete beam–column connections under seismic loads. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering. Lisbon, Portugal

  35. Somma G, Russo G (2001) Comportamento dei nodi interni trave pilastro nelle strutture in cemento armato soggette a carichi sismici di elevata intensità. PhD Thesis, University of Florence

  36. Teraoka M (1997) A study on seismic design of R/C beam-column joint in high rise frame structure. Research Report—extra issue no 5. Fujita Institute of Technology, Tokyo

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to Randolph Borg UCL for his indications and suggestions on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Pieretto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Somma, G., Pieretto, A., Rossetto, T. et al. R.C. beam to column connection failure assessment and limit state design. Mater Struct 48, 1215–1231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0227-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0227-x

Keywords

Navigation