Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tests on superelastic Ni–Ti SMA bars under cyclic tension and direct-shear: towards practical recentring connections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are smart metals featuring either superelastic effect or shape memory effect. While current emphasis on the civil engineering application of SMA is mainly given to dampers and isolators, recent research has been directed to superelastic SMA bolts or tendons for recentring connections. However, available information on the mechanical shear response of SMA bars is still inadequate. Consequently, this knowledge barrier can cause significant uncertainties when such components are intended to resist shear action. In this respect, this paper presents an experimental study on SMA bars subject to cyclic direct-shear actions, and uniaxial tensile tests were also undertaken on the bars of similar sizes for comparison. Key results including stress–strain/force–displacement hysteretic response, recentring ability, and energy dissipation are discussed in detail. The results show sound recentring and moderate energy dissipation/damping capabilities of the bars under cyclic tension below a strain level of 3 %, but beyond this the properties start to degrade. The SMA bars with a smaller diameter seem to perform better than those with a larger diameter. On the other hand, the cyclic direct-shear performance of SMA bars is generally unsatisfactory with poor recentring, energy dissipation, and damping characteristics. Therefore, the direct use of SMA bars subject to shear loading is undesirable. For both tension and shear tests, fracture of the bars within the threaded area is the most typical failure mode, which should be minimised in future applications to ensure a ductile response of seismic resistance devices. Recognising both advantages and potential shortcomings of the SMA bars, an innovative recentring connection type is proposed, and the preliminarily findings indicate that such connections are feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buehler WJ, Gilfrich JW, Wiley RC (1963) Effects of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi. J Appl Phys 34:1475–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R (2001) SMA re-centering devices for seismic isolation of civil structures, In: Proceedings of SPIE, pp 238–249

  3. Wilde K, Gardoni P, Fujino Y (2000) Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges. Eng Struct 22:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormick J, DesRoches R, Fugazza D, Auricchio F (2007) Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces. J Struct Eng 133:270–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang CSW, DesRoches R, Leon RT (2010) Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices. Eng Struct 32:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim TJ, McDowell DL (1995) Path dependence of shape memory alloys during cyclic loading. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 6:817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolons D, Gandhi F, Malovrh B (1998) Experimental investigation of the pseudoelastic hysterestic damping characteristics of shape memory alloy wires. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 9:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamai H, Kitagawa Y (2002) Pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloy wires and its application to seismic resistance member for building. Comput Mater Sci 25:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Piedboeuf MC, Gauvin R, Thomas M (1998) Damping behaviour of shape memory alloys: strain amplitude, frequency and temperature effects. J Sound Vib 214:885–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolce M, Cardone D (2001) Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications, 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension. Int J Mech Sci 43:2657–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tobushi H, Shimeno Y, Hachisuka T, Tanaka K (1998) Influence of strain rate on superelastic properties of TiNi shape memory alloy. Mech Mater 30:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DesRoches R, McCormick J, Delemont MA (2004) Cyclical properties of superelastic shape memory alloys. J Struct Eng 130:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fugazza D (2005) Experimental investigation on the cyclic properties of superelastic NiTi shape-memory alloy wires and bars. Rose School, European school for advanced studies in reduction of seismic risk, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dolce M, Cardone D (2001) Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications, 1. Martensite and austenite NiTi bars subjected to torsion. Int J Mech Sci 43:2631–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolce M, Cardone D (2005) Fatigue resistance of SMA-martensite bars subjected to flexural bending. Int J Mech Sci 47:1693–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DesRoches R, Taftali B, Ellingwood BR (2010) Seismic performance of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections, part I—analysis and seismic demands. J Earthq Eng 14:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma HW, Cho C, Wilkinson T (2008) A numerical study on bolted end-plate connection using shape memory alloys. Mater Struct 41:1419–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma HW, Wilkinson T, Cho C (2007) Feasibility study on a self-centering beam-to-column connection by using the superelastic behavior of SMAs. Smart Mater Struct 16:1555–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ocel J, DesRoches R, Leon RT, Hess WG, Krumme R, Hayes JR, Sweeney S (2004) Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys. J Struct Eng 130:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rofooei FR, Farhidzadeh A (2011) Investigation on the seismic behavior of steel MRF with shape memory alloy equipped connections. Proc Eng 14:3325–3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Speicher MS, DesRoches R, Leon RT (2011) Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentring beam-column connection. Eng Struct 33:2448–2457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormick J, Tyber J, DesRoches R, Gall K, Maier HJ (2007) Structural engineering with NiTi. II: mechanical behavior and scaling. J Eng Mech 133:1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyber J, McCormick J, Gall K, DesRoches R, Maier JH, Abdel Maksoud AE (2007) Structural engineering with NiTi. I: basic materials characterization. J Eng Mech 133:1009–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lagoudas DC (2008) Shape memory alloys: modeling and engineering applications. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallaert JJ, Fisher JW (1965) Shear strength of high-strength bolts. J Struct Div 91:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cardone D (2012) Re-centring capability of flag-shaped seismic isolation systems. Bull Earthq Eng 10:1267–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCormick, J, DesRoches R (2006). The effect of training, pre-straining, and loading history on the properties of NiTi shape memory alloys for protective systems in civil structures. In: Proceedings of the ASCE, Structures congress

  28. Eurocode (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Brussels, Belgium

  29. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2005) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC, Chicago

  30. ABAQUS (2011) Analysis User’s manual, v6.11. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence

  31. Auricchio F, Taylor RL (1997) Shape-memory alloys: modeling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behaviour. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 143:175–194

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Auricchio F, Taylor RL, Lubliner J (1997) Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behaviour. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 146:281–312

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU 5321/10E). The assistance of Dr. Angus CC Lam, Mr. Jiang Chuanglong and Mr. Tou Ka Man in conducting the tests is also acknowledged. The authors would also like to acknowledge the editing by Dr. Paul W. Fox of an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK

    Cheng Fang

  2. Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China

    Cheng Fang & Michael C. H. Yam

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, The South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China

    Hongwei Ma

  4. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China

    K. F. Chung

Authors
  1. Cheng Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael C. H. Yam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongwei Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. F. Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, C., Yam, M.C.H., Ma, H. et al. Tests on superelastic Ni–Ti SMA bars under cyclic tension and direct-shear: towards practical recentring connections. Mater Struct 48, 1013–1030 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0212-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0212-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation