Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear and flexural characterization of grid-reinforced asphalt pavements and relation with field distress evolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of geogrids at the interface of asphalt layers is currently adopted to improve pavement performance in terms of rutting, fatigue and reflective cracking. Several test methods have been proposed in order to simulate the complex mechanical behavior of reinforced pavements and assist practitioners in the selection of the appropriate reinforcement product. A particular subject of debate is the evaluation of geogrid effects in terms of both flexural strength and interlayer bonding. In this context, an interlaboratory experiment has been organized as part of the RILEM TC 237-SIB/TG4 with a twofold objective: to compare the predictive effectiveness of different experimental approaches and to analyze the behavior of different geogrid types. For this purpose two experimental reinforced test sections have been realized, the first one to prepare samples for the interlaboratory experiment, the second one to analyze the geogrid field performance under heavy traffic conditions. This paper describes the test results obtained by one participating laboratory on double-layered asphalt samples extracted from the first experimental section and compares them with the periodic visual observation of the reflective cracking evolution occurred in the second test section. The laboratory tests were performed following a specific testing protocol that combines interlayer shear tests, repeated loading tests in a four-point bending configuration and quasi-static three-point bending tests, in order to investigate the overall performance of double-layered asphalt systems. Results have shown that geogrid reinforcement does not noticeably influence the flexural stiffness and strength in the pre-cracking phase, whereas the crack propagation speed can be significantly reduced and the failure behavior may change from quasibrittle to ductile, depending on the interlayer shear resistance. Laboratory results were confirmed by periodic visual observation of field performance in terms of reflective cracking evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin RA, Gilchrist AJT (1996) Enhanced performance of asphalt pavements using geocomposites. Geotext Geomembr 14:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown SF, Thom NH, Sanders PJ (2001) A study of grid reinforced asphalt to combat reflection cracking. J Assoc Asphalt Paving 70:543–569

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canestrari F, Santagata E (2005) Temperature effects on the shear behaviour of tack coat emulsions used in flexible pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 6(1):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Canestrari F, Ferrotti G, Partl MN, Santagata E (2005) Advanced testing and characterization of interlayer shear resistance. Transp Res Record 1929:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canestrari F, Pasquini E, Belogi L (2012a) Optimization of geocomposites for double-layered bituminous systems, RILEM Bookseries, vol 4. pp 1229–1239

  6. Canestrari F, Ferrotti G, Lu X, Millien A, Partl MN, Petit C, Phelipot-Mardelé A, Piber H, Raab C (2012b) Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements. In: RILEM State-of-the-art-report: advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 303–360. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5104-0

  7. Ferrotti G, Canestrari F, Virgili A, Grilli A (2011) A strategic laboratory approach for the performance investigation of geogrids in flexible pavements. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2343–2348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrotti G, Canestrari F, Pasquini E, Virgili A (2012) Experimental evaluation of the influence of surface coating on fiberglass geogrid performance in asphalt pavements. Geotext Geomembr 34:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graziani A, Virgili A, Belogi L (2011). Instrumented test section for the evaluation of geogrids in asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on bituminous mixtures and pavements, Thessaloniki, pp 1107–1117

  10. Judycki J (1990). Bending test of asphaltic mixture under statical loading. In: Proceedings of the 4th RILEM international symposium, Budapest

  11. Kim H, Sokolov K, Poulikakos LD, Partl MN (2009) Fatigue evaluation of carbon FRP-reinforced porous asphalt composite system using a model mobile load simulator. Transp Res Record 2116:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinney TC, Yuan X (1995). Geogrid aperture rigidity by in-plane rotation. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’95, Nashville, pp 525–537

  13. Komatsu T, Kikuta H, Tuji Y, Muramatsu E (1998) Durability assessment of geogrid-reinforced asphalt concrete. Geotext Geomembr 16:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunst PAJC, Kirschner R (1993). Comparative laboratory investigations on polymer asphalt inlays. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’93, Vancouver

  15. Kwang WK, Yong-Churl P, Kyu-Seok Y (1996) Tensile reinforcement of asphalt concrete using polymer coating. Constr Build Mater 10(2):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SJ (2008) Mechanical performance and crack retardation study of a fiberglass-grid-reinforced asphalt concrete system. Can J Civil Eng 35(10):1042–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Millien A, Dragomir ML, Wendling L, Petit C, Iliescu M (2012) Geogrid interlayer performance in pavements: tensile-bending test for crack propagation. In: Proceedings of the 7th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, Delft, pp 1209–1218

  18. Montestruque G, Rodrigues R, Nods M, Elsing A (2004) Stop of reflective crack propagation with the use of PET geogrid as asphalt overlay reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 5th international RILEM conference on reflective cracking in pavements, Limoges

  19. O’Farrell DJ (1996). The treatment of reflective cracking with modified asphalt and reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 3th international RILEM conference on reflective cracking in pavements, Maastricht

  20. Pasquini E, Bocci M, Ferrotti G, Canestrari F (2012) Laboratory characterisation and field validation of geogrid-reinforced asphalt pavements. Road Mater Pavement. doi:10.1080/14680629.2012.735797

  21. Penman J, Hook KD (2008) The use of geogrids to retard reflective cracking on airport runways, taxiways and aprons. In: Proceedings of the 6th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, Chicago, pp 713–720

  22. RILEM TC QFS (2004) Quasibrittle fracture scaling and size effect—final report. Mater Struct 37(272):547–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Santagata FA, Partl MN, Ferrotti G, Canestrari F, Flisch A (2008) Layer characteristics affecting interlayer shear resistance in flexible pavements. J Assoc Asphalt Paving 77:221–256

    Google Scholar 

  24. Santagata FA, Ferrotti G, Partl MN, Canestrari F (2009) Statistical investigation of two different interlayer shear test methods. Mater Struct 42:705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobhan K, Crooks T, Tandon V, Mattingly S (2004) Laboratory simulation of the growth and propagation of reflection cracks in geogrid reinforced asphalt overlay. In: Proceedings of the 5th international RILEM conference on reflective cracking in pavements, Limoges

  26. Virgili A, Canestrari F, Grilli A, Santagata FA (2009) Repeated load test on bituminous systems reinforced by geosynthetics. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zamora-Barraza D, Calzada-Peréz M, Castro-Fresno D, Vega-Zamanillo A (2010) New procedure for measuring adherence between a geosynthetic material and a bituminous mixture. Geotext Geomembr 28:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zamora-Barraza D, Calzada-Peréz M, Castro-Fresno D, Vega-Zamanillo A (2011) Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone. Geotext Geomembr 29:130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zielínski P (2008) Fatigue investigations of asphalt concrete beams reinforced with geosynthetics interlayer. In: Proceedings of the 6th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, Chicago, pp 751–759

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper was partly funded by the Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

    Francesco Canestrari, Leonello Belogi, Gilda Ferrotti & Andrea Graziani

Authors
  1. Francesco Canestrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonello Belogi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gilda Ferrotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Graziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilda Ferrotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canestrari, F., Belogi, L., Ferrotti, G. et al. Shear and flexural characterization of grid-reinforced asphalt pavements and relation with field distress evolution. Mater Struct 48, 959–975 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0207-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0207-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation